Man buys $330 000 home for $16

Discussion in 'General Off-Topic Chat' started by loco365, Jul 22, 2011.

  1. loco365
    OP

    loco365 GBAtemp Guru

    Member
    11
    Sep 1, 2010
    In a process called Adverse Possession, a Texan man bought a house for only $16. News video below.

    [youtube]DpqKIzxiixc[/youtube]

    Neighbors don't like the idea of buying an expensive home for so little, and they want him out.

    If you knew that you could buy a home like this, would you take advantage of it?

    Do you think it's fair that he bought such an expensive home for so little?
     
  2. Nujui

    Nujui I need something to do.

    Member
    2
    Aug 12, 2010
    United States
    Dreamland.
    Well, if it was all fair and legal, then yes.
     
  3. Vulpes Abnocto

    Vulpes Abnocto Drinks, Knows Things

    Former Staff
    13
    Jun 24, 2008
    United States
    I've been waiting on this story to come to GBAtemp.
    From what I've read the guy has to live in the house with no power and no water for three years before it actually 'belongs' to him. Not the easiest of things to do.
    But I'm all for sticking it to Big Bank Government.
     
  4. dickfour

    dickfour Banned

    Banned
    2
    Jun 20, 2011
    United States
    Buy some kerosine lamps and a chemical toilet and I'd be all set. For $16 yell yeah
     
  5. Sir-Fritz

    Sir-Fritz GBAtemp Maniac

    Member
    3
    May 4, 2008
    Brisbane, Australia
    Wouldn't living in a house with no water be illegal though?
     
  6. Nebz

    Nebz The N00b

    Member
    2
    Jul 1, 2010
    United States
    Rhode Island
    I had seen this a few days ago on WSHH. In my opinion, it seem all fair. The home won't actually belong to him for some time. Whether he lasts that long or not it still seems just fine to me.

    I understand why some of those people are upset since this man may seemingly be the owner of a home for $16 while they've payed or are paying thousands but damn... They should hop off a bit.

    Homie did his homework and I'm glad to see it payed off for him [​IMG]
     
  7. SinHarvest24

    SinHarvest24 Shiroyasha

    Member
    1
    Oct 8, 2010
    Chad
    Anywhere you think of me.
    I didn't catch the full story but i don't understand why he has to do that though.


    If you knew that you could buy a home like this, would you take advantage of it?

    Hell yeah, a house real fucking expensive.


    Do you think it's fair that he bought such an expensive home for so little?

    Well according to Vulpes, if the guy have to live in the house with no power and no water for three years. That's no easy task. Even still, if i think it's fair...no.
     
  8. Zarcon

    Zarcon .:~Enigmatic Wanderer~:.

    Former Staff
    4
    Nov 6, 2002
    Canada
    Toronto, Ontario
    Living with no power or running water for 3 years is quite a feat.
    If he lasts that long and goes uncontested then he deserves the house.

    The neighbours may have had to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars with their hard earned money, but at least they got to come home to proper modern living conditions.

    This guy still has to work presumably and then comes home to a near empty house with no power or running water.

    sinharvest24: At the moment he only technically owns the house.
    The original owner who abandoned the place is still the owner so he can't go and activate the power and water so to speak.
     
  9. Joe88

    Joe88 [λ]

    Moderator
    13
    Jan 6, 2008
    United States
    heres the full story

    http://www.9news.com/news/sidetracks/20921...r-330000-house-
     
  10. DeMoN

    DeMoN GBAtemp Guru

    Member
    4
    May 12, 2004
    United States
    So the original owner couldn't pay his mortgage and had to leave but the bank that issued the mortgage went out of business.
    Why didn't the original owner go back? There's no one to pay his debt to.
     
  11. shyam513

    shyam513 GBAtemp Regular

    Member
    1
    May 26, 2010
    London
    I don't see anything wrong with it - I'm all for sticking one to the banks. To be honest, if the law says he can do it, and it's not hurting anyone, why shouldn't he?
     
  12. p1ngpong

    p1ngpong Anti Switch Owners

    Former Staff
    18
    Apr 18, 2008
    Croatia
    DS Scene
    Yeah I was thinking the same thing after watching that myself. In an ideal world the poor guy who lost his home originally, presumably because of financial trouble should just get his home back.

    I am curious as to how old this law is, every country has antiquated laws on the books that people who do a little research can exploit. Kudos to the guy for being smart enough to exploit the law that way, but at the end of the day he amounts to little more than a vulture. I would be all for his actions if the home was abandoned in other circumstances, but as it is he is just trying to profit through someone else's misfortune.
     
  13. Raika

    Raika uguu

    Member
    2
    Sep 15, 2008
    uguu
    Neighbors are jelly of him. Just move on, dammit.
     
  14. FireGrey

    FireGrey Undercover Admin

    Member
    6
    Apr 13, 2010
    after all that time of living at the house with no water and electricity he would grow sick of the house.
     
  15. Creqaw

    Creqaw GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    3
    Sep 10, 2007
    Netherlands
    The Netherlands
    Well even then, he could just sell it and buy a cheaper one.
     
  16. Veho

    Veho The man who cried "Ni".

    Former Staff
    16
    Apr 4, 2006
    Croatia
    Zagreb
    Eh...

    There are similar laws about arable land. It depends on the country but basically if the owner doesn't claim or use arable land for a set number of years, it defaults to the state or the current occupant. So you can basically start growing lettuce on a patch of abandoned land (mind the zoning regulations), and in X years the land is yours by law (void where not valid). Same thing with houses, I guess.

    As for the original owner, he could have done the same, (had he known the law). Mortgage company goes bust, he moves back in, and in three years he gets the house without paying back the loan. But then he would be getting the stuff he paid for with the mortgage loan, for free. Would that be fair? Eh...

    And the neighbours are just jelly [​IMG]
     
  17. Depravo

    Depravo KALSARIKÄNNIT

    Global Moderator
    13
    GBAtemp Patron
    Depravo is a Patron of GBAtemp and is helping us stay independent!

    Our Patreon
    Oct 13, 2008
    Purgatory
    I wonder why the youtube uploader felt it necessary to point out the man was black. It's as if he's implying it would be fine if it was a white guy.
     
  18. ShawnTRods

    ShawnTRods GBAtemp Psycho!

    Member
    6
    Mar 26, 2011
    United Kingdom
    Earth
    If the Neighbors are jelly, just tell them to swap homes with him lol.
    No Electricity, No water?
    Fuck no -.-
     
  19. InuYasha

    InuYasha Professional Coke Fiend

    Member
    3
    Dec 8, 2007
    United States
    Interesting to say the least but I do wonder about a few things...

    1.Can he run something such as a generator for power or is that illegal?
    2.What happens if the house gets burned down before the 3 years is up?
    3.Where the hell is he gonna take his showers for the next 3 years?
     
  20. Foxi4

    Foxi4 On the hunt...

    Global Moderator
    26
    Sep 13, 2009
    Poland
    Gaming Grotto
    There is nothing illegal about this whole matter and such laws are present not only in America. These laws are "with us" since Ancient Rome ("Usucaptio", "Longi Temporis Praescriptio."), and since most law codes are based more or less on Roman law, we stick with them.

    Res habilis + titulus + fides + possessio + tempus are the things necessary in this process, that being "a thing one wants to possess, law title, good will, posessions and time".

    The man is simply claiming ownership over something that has no owner, once he pays the court bills ($16) the building is lawfuly his by the time of 3 or so years.

    That's your interpretation. Jesus, I hate it when people point that out. When will people learn that skin colour is a characteristic like any other and saying that a black person is black is *not* offensive and doesn't imply anything. All it means is, d'uh, the person we're reffering to is black.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice