Joe Biden Wins - Becomes 46th president of the United States

[Deleted User]

I´m surprised no one here is talking about inauguration of Joe Biden on Wednesday, January 20, 2021.

 

[Lacius]

Yes. Because the election is decided by the electoral college not by most votes.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------



Dozens of whistleblowers. Eye witness testimony. Invalid votes cast post deadline not properly postmarked still counted as valid. Investigations showing dead people voting, showing people voting in states they don't live in and voting more than one time. Voting machines "glitching" and flipping votes at rates too high to be computer error, unmarked, unsecured boxes with tens of thousands of votes showing up from unknown couriers at 3am, vote watchers being refused to witness votes being counted.

But other than all this. There's no evidence at all.

Please provide the single best piece of specific evidence, not debunked claims of evidence. For example, if you're going to claim there's evidence of widespread dead people voting, please provide it.

 

[djpannda]

Yes. Because the election is decided by the electoral college not by most votes.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------



Dozens of whistleblowers. Eye witness testimony. Invalid votes cast post deadline not properly postmarked still counted as valid. Investigations showing dead people voting, showing people voting in states they don't live in and voting more than one time. Voting machines "glitching" and flipping votes at rates too high to be computer error, unmarked, unsecured boxes with tens of thousands of votes showing up from unknown couriers at 3am, vote watchers being refused to witness votes being counted.

But other than all this. There's no evidence at all.

....
American Thinker joins conservative outlets walking back voter fraud claims
soo... the only two "Evidence" you have left are
1. Members of the Seditious Coup..
2.

 

[Cryoraptor]

Please provide the single best piece of specific evidence, not debunked claims of evidence. For example, if you're going to claim there's evidence of widespread dead people voting, please provide it.

The 'dead people voting' one is the worst he could have possibly chosen. That isn't just lacking evidence, it's actually been disproven.

*Snip*

 

[Frankfort42]

@Frankfort42*Snip* Everything that happened at the capitol was ILLEGAL! Trespassing on restricted land is not at all the same as peaceful protests in the public streets. Also don't you realise that doing what happened to the capitol is directly in contradiction with democracy..... Maybe you don't understand what democracy is... Democracy: a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives.
The riot at the capitol is in direct contradiction of democracy! Don't you get that phrase *Snip*?!

Most of the 100,000+ protesters weren't rioting or trespassing. Protesting is a Constitutional right, regardless if you agree with why it's happening.

 

[Lacius]

The 'dead people voting' one is the worst he could have possibly chosen. That isn't just lacking evidence, it's actually been disproven.

I know. I'm just making the point that claiming evidence isn't the same thing as providing evidence.

 

[Purple_Shyguy]

Stop dodging the question, silly goober, I'm asking you if you think a candidate losing the popular vote by 5 million votes is a fair system.

It's absolutely a fair system. The only system that makes sense. Otherwise the entire election is decided by just two states, California and Texas. Due to their population size. Making every other states votes useless. Not really fair is it. That's why the electoral college is in place.

I know. I'm just making the point that claiming evidence isn't the same thing as providing evidence.

And claiming there is no evidence isn't the same as there being no evidence

 

[Cryoraptor]

*Snip*

It wasn't speculation. It's literal fact.

[Citation needed]

 

[Lacius]

And claiming there is no evidence isn't the same as there being no evidence

It's a good thing the burden of proof is on the person claiming there was widespread election fraud then.

 

[Purple_Shyguy]

It's a good thing the burden of proof is on the person claiming there was widespread election fraud then.

Ok can we have be allowed to investigate the votes?

Democrats - "No."

 

[Cryoraptor]

It's a good thing the burden of proof is on the person claiming there was widespread election fraud then.

I love it. We're right back to Creationist Fallacy thinking: "Well God exists because I say so and the burden of proof is on you to disprove God"

 

[Cryoraptor]

Ok can we have be allowed to investigate the votes?

Democrats - "No."

...Investigations have been made. Courts have been shown 'evidence'. How can you be so incredulously ignorant about what's going on in your own country?

 

[Lacius]

Ok can we have be allowed to investigate the votes?

Democrats - "No."

Not only did Democrats not say "no" to investigations, but the investigations occurred, and no evidence of widespread voter fraud was found.

 

[Cryoraptor]

Not only did Democrats not say "no" to investigations, but the investigations occurred, and no evidence of widespread voter fraud was found.

When all else fails, just claim suppression and censorship. Makes you laugh

 

[Purple_Shyguy]

I love it. We're right back to Creationist Fallacy thinking: "Well God exists because I say so and the burden of proof is on you to disprove God"

"We hold these truths to be self evident, all men and women created by the.. go you know the you know the thing" - Joe Biden

 

[djpannda]

When all else fails, just claim suppression and censorship. Makes you laugh

don't forget to Bypass Censorship of Sedition.. RUN to Russia to help
Failed to fetch tweet https://twitter.com/AdamSculthorpe/status/1350872780355596289

*Snip*

 

[Purple_Shyguy]

Not only did Democrats not say "no" to investigations, but the investigations occurred, and no evidence of widespread voter fraud was found.

When being "allowed" to investigate things like the Dominion voting machines it means they were allowed into a room to look at the outside of the machine. Refused to see internals, refused to see the code. They were completely obstructed and you're not clever by pretending you don't know.

 

[Lacius]

Most of the 100,000+ protesters weren't rioting or trespassing. Protesting is a Constitutional right, regardless if you agree with why it's happening.

Regardless of whether or not everyone there participated in the armed insurrection that was the invasion of the Capitol, it's anti-democratic to protest the results of a free and fair election, and they were still participating in Trump's attempted coup d'état. In other words, even if everything had been peaceful at the Capitol, those who were there perpetuated false and dangerous information about election fraud, and their goal was to persuade members of Congress to arbitrarily overturn the results of the election.

It should also be noted that over 200 subject case files have been opened in response to the armed insurrection at the Capitol, and they were there because Trump instigated it.

 

[Purple_Shyguy]

don't forget to Bypass Censorship of Sedition.. RUN to Russia to help
https://twitter.com/AdamSculthorpe/status/1350872780355596289

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------


... Really?

When multiple giant billionaire tech monopolies team up like a giant evil cabal to openly crush competition they don't like where should they go?

Oh no! Scary Russia! Edward Snowdens doing fine.

 

[Cryoraptor]

It's absolutely a fair system. The only system that makes sense. Otherwise the entire election is decided by just two states, California and Texas. Due to their population size. Making every other states votes useless. Not really fair is it. That's why the electoral college is in place.

Not necessarily. It could be done a similar way to how the UK does it; still not outright decided by the numbers alone, but a lot closer; any winner has to win more than 50% of votes. Obviously, it can't work in the exact same way, but the current system could be massively improved upon.

"We hold these truths to be self evident, all men and women created by the.. go you know the you know the thing" - Joe Biden

This is a non-response.

*Snip*