You're appealing to a conspiracy theory that involves unlikely actors from multiple branches of government behaving politically opposite of their appointments. Your allegation isn't believable or credible.
I'm rejecting your appeal to authority based on its history. I don't need a "counter appeal" to anything. That's nonsense. My allegation? My allegation is that this election does not inspire faith. I don't believe in it, and I think it's ridiculous that there are still people who do.
A goddamn trump tweet is not evidence. Link me a single piece of credible evidence.
Like I am saying. You reject any evidence, because nothing that helps Trump is credible. It's obvious that I did not refer to a Trump tweet. Your disingenuous response is worthy of disingenuous consideration.
I did a thing