yes when you already in a precarious situation, let's kick you down the flight of stairs (choosing not to take the job) instead of kicking you in the face(taking the job).
got it.
Lol I got a job and you don't so who is the idiot here.
yes when you already in a precarious situation, let's kick you down the flight of stairs (choosing not to take the job) instead of kicking you in the face(taking the job).
got it.
I think alot of people in america find themselves in incredibly unfortunate situation. The oxycontin pandamic, with the heads of this evil occurance joking about the death of these "pill-billies". The death of despair statistic is rising exponetially. I feel very sorry. Take care us americans.Seriously no one should pity OP, unemployment insurance would only help him/her for six month after that it is over, what they suppose to do feed OP for life. If they find $8.25 is too little then find something that pay more than that. Actually you get less than 8 dollars from unemployment, you get about 400 before tax, so you get about 287, if you divide that by 40 you only get $7.17
Nice edit. Again, no. I live in North Dakota, I also lived in Arizona, and Nevada in the past. I consistantly have seen jobs paying below 10.00. Up until perhaps 1 and a half years ago. But that's after food and rent already priced hiked by over 200 dollars. The issue isn't just pay. While you want to keep believing that I somehow don't have a job. (How do I pay for the internet here to ramble if I don't have a job) The primary issue is again, Captalists claiming that they won't force workers into taking a job. While citing Communists/Socialists would. That's my original argument. And my argument is that the United States government is essentially doing the same thing.They ain't forcing you if you don't want to take the job then you will be unemployed for real there are plenty of jobs out there that pay atleast 2x of $8.25
Nice edit. Again, no. I live in North Dakota, I also lived in Arizona, and Nevada in the past. I consistantly have seen jobs paying below 10.00. Up until perhaps 1 and a half years ago. But that's after food and rent already priced hiked by over 200 dollars. The issue isn't just pay. While you want to keep believing that I somehow don't have a job. (How do I pay for the internet here to ramble if I don't have a job) The primary issue is again, Captalists claiming that they won't force workers into taking a job. While citing Communists/Socialists would. That's my original argument. And my argument is that the United States government is essentially doing the same thing.
If people are going to claim/cite (in this case the USSR) starving people intentionally because they didn't want to work the jobs the government wanted to. How on earth is this no different?
What OP is getting at in my view, and why this is relevant to this topic is that the bolshevik regime is now a global power, that has learned not to use hard power, like causing planned famine and mass starvation, mass shootings etc switching to softpower, since now they know what a terribel look that is. They use softpower instead of hardpower, and that is what OP describes. The differances are the mechanisms and how they are percieved, while being in essence the same. Same people, motives, goals different mechanisms. Hope that clarifies things for OP.
For furhter reading I recommend this:
Nice edit. Again, no. I live in North Dakota, I also lived in Arizona, and Nevada in the past. I consistantly have seen jobs paying below 10.00. Up until perhaps 1 and a half years ago. But that's after food and rent already priced hiked by over 200 dollars. The issue isn't just pay. While you want to keep believing that I somehow don't have a job. (How do I pay for the internet here to ramble if I don't have a job) The primary issue is again, Captalists claiming that they won't force workers into taking a job. While citing Communists/Socialists would. That's my original argument. And my argument is that the United States government is essentially doing the same thing.
If people are going to claim/cite (in this case the USSR) starving people intentionally because they didn't want to work the jobs the government wanted to. How on earth is this no different? You are choosing no to a specific job because it doesn't pay enough for living standards.
What's more supportive? giving 24 weeks for someone to get a working job in order?
Or if they deny the first job in that time period, kick them onto the streets, and end it.
that's not my point. If you don't remember Biden has put an excutive order that requires you to take the first job. If you don't, benefits end immediately afterword. I'm not stating what happens after 6 months. I'm talking specifically within that time period and the changes that have happened to it.Well it is your choice after 6 months they ain't going to give you unemployment benefit like it or not, if you get a job offer if you don't take it then it is on you, regardless on how much the minimum wage in your state is, you can get a job that pay more than the minimum wage.
that's not my point. If you don't remember Biden has put an excutive order that requires you to take the first job. If you don't, benefits end immediately afterword. I'm not stating what happens after 6 months. I'm talking specifically within that time period and the changes that have happened to it.
That is fine until you factor in why people are unemployed in the first place.I don't see any difference though, a job is a job, you lose your unemployment benefit when you refuse to work since an employer made an offer to you.
Maybe it is a solution, it could be a motivator to change thing bottom to top.However you don't fix that by giving ever bigger sticks to the people who were lucky that they didn't have that hurdle to overcome.
Maybe it is a solution, it could be a motivator to change thing bottom to top.
Where exactly? Without descending into a crime spree or civil uprising,There are historical examples that this has worked.
No, if you want to make a point about something then you have to actually make a point.Study the italian german history of the early 20th century.
EDIT: Unfortunatly I don't feel at liberty to make my point. It may or may not be within the bounds of valid free speech and I'm just going to assume that a discussion like this would not welcome on this plattform. I hate to do this, but if you want to know about this subject just look at the crude realities of italian and german history of the early 20th century.No, if you want to make a point about something then you have to actually make a point.