Well, in the beginning I needed to get used to it, but after that it didn't 'annoy' me anymore. If you look right in front of you, you won't even notice you're wearing Glass after a while.
Google did that very well. They made sure it won't be in your field of vision so that it would distract you.
Well, figured that. I meant entertainment wise. Personally, I think it should cover a large field of vision
and give you the choice what to take up.
One day only huh. I think they are trying to create a sense of scarcity or something, because at that price if they just simply released the product, I think it would fail for sure. The google glasses will be another distraction for everyone involved anyway. It's kinda like the smart watch. It begs the question can't you just pull out your phone and be done with it. The people wearing the Google glasses will be looking all goofy IMO.
Well, of course. It's still in beta. That's for the price and the looks.
For people who already wear watches, it wouldn't be "another distraction". Why take your phone out just for quick glances and replies? There are watches that can even replace the phone altogether.
I'm sure we'll get something that look like regular glasses and can even standalone.
I would much rather buy the Laster SeeThru:
http://laster.fr/products/seethru/?lg=en
They had an (unfortunately) failed kickstarter, but they are taking pre-orders on their site now. Laster is taking a different approach to it and I like it. Having no camera on it is a plus. Eliminates the social stigma of the thing. (The "why are you taking a picture of me?" confrontation..)
On the kickstarter you could get a kit to assemble (no solder, easy screw together) for $349 and pre-assembled for $399. Sure beats $1500. The $399 included the SDK as well. Nice.
I might pre-order one as long as I can get black frames. The white are just not speaking to me.
-Vm
It's like a bigger Google Glass. Having no camera takes away a lot of functionality. Something they could have solve by just putting on a cap, not taking away the camera.
Not sure why on Earth these things are still a big deal.
Pretty much all of the "exciting experiences" I've seen involving Google Glass were just using it as a mini-GoPro. Not sure how that's so life changing.
Especially when you consider there are VR headsets coming which cost way less and do way more.
Well, it's new and still in development.
One, they can do more than that and two, that's like telling someone content with a camera smartphone to get a point-and-shoot camera. Google Glass is still lighter, more from your POV and as said, do
more things.
VR is much bigger hardware and is meant to take up your whole vision away from the world. AR glasses are the opposite in that they are meant to add.
We going to get something between Laster SeeThru,Google Glass and Atheer Labs,Metapro.