I don't think a war would fix anything. What, a world war between countries completely fucking slaughtering each other? That's your wicked conclusion of our solution?Blaze163 said:The most worrying thing is that the only way I can see of actually doing anything about the problem is...well, a war. And not one of these half arsed wars where America steamrollers a developing nation within a fortnight. A real war. Where everyone on Earth is fighting to survive. Or some sort of global cataclysm, like a meteor impact or some such. Think about it. If the world as we know it came to an end, how many of us would actually survive? Do you know how to...
Even if I at all agreed with this, the top countries in the world would still come out on top. We'd all unite against those who were below us, because we still want to be on top (ie, the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia, and perhaps China). My estimate is that if this actually happened we'd lose about three billion people, according to the apocalyptic mood you give.
Yeah, because only the United States partakes in one-sided wars, right?
@PharaohsVizier: It's hard to have faith in humanity when you see so many people doing the absolute bare minimum or below even that. I rely on our educated people to give us a better world, not our general masses. It's too big a responsibility in my opinion. Too many people would rather go into cosmetology rather than cosmology, too many people are happy with becoming a burger-flipper rather than a physicist. Obviously, the science field isn't for everybody, but people don't aspire to be what they can.











