While Sciresm has dropped hints that 4.1.0 has software entrypoints for direct entry on boot, I fully expect that FG will be needed at the very least for the initial foot in the door, and will likely be needed for many firmware versions, especially future ones. It might not be so trivial to update the boot loader code in the Tegra SoC, even at the factory. That means tethered booting will likely be a thing that hangs around unless a far bigger hole is found.
As such, I think having a toggling joycon and a portable injector fob would be good medicine, even with full direct-boot capability.
He hasn't even just hinted about it. The same exploit from 3.0 roughly works on 4.1 with some modifications. The 4.1 exploit SciresM found was announced weeks before Fusee. It's just a matter of if/when that's coming out. Also Fusee FAQ did say software only was coming
As the exploit / the boot rom isn't patchable and you always will have the possibility to inject some payload at this very early stage and no matter what nintendon't will do in the future, then why taking the risk going online with a modified firmware?
Only for the possibility of a softmod / untethered coldboot? No, thanks.
The other thing is, that you always have to keep your fw up to date to be able to use the online services. Doing so with a customized firmware you are dependent on the author of the cfw patches who has to keep up with every newely released original firmware and adapt to it.
A seperate offline cfw isn't dependent on any updates provided by nintendon't to run some homebrew or whatever.
I know this all comes with some inconvenience, but in my opinion the benefits outweigh.
It's all about options. I don't care for online and I would rather be able to boot CFW untethered. If online play is important to you then great, go with a tethered exploit. The Fusee FAQ does say a software only solution is coming though. So we both win.