Number One: Babies aren't parasites.
Number Two: Why does the woman have rights, but not the baby?
Number Three: Abortion is not life-saving! Where does that retarded notion come from? Abortion is life-ending!
Waeeh me not informed, but be emotion! Babies! Killing! Must.. protest on ... online... webforum.
When does a human become a human with unalienable human rights?
Sometime in the mothers womb.
When exactly? At conception? Nope, because there it is a clump of cells - that couldnt be called human yet.
When they got sensory capability? To some extent yes, but as they dont develop all at once - its not clear cut.
So how to approach this?
Humans in stories I know from the middle east are not only known to go to quacks that perform 'in living room operations' just so the don't have to birth a baby, they socially or psychologically dont want to. Many of them die. Women are known to put heavy rocks on their womb in other parts of the world, until they have a miscarriage, just so they dont have to birth a baby they socially or psychologically dont want to.
Bigger issue - its part of their body, and as a state you cant easily regulate peoples actionability over their bodies. Not with force. In most of western legal tradition.
Which brings us back to - but you do it, if you have to saveguard the interests of other human life. Which brings us back to - when does a fetus get inalienable human rights.
Which brings us back to - its not at conception.
How are abortions also saving lives? If a fertilized egg hasnt left the fallopian tube, is starting to develop there, eventually causing in body bleeding and killing the women and the child, f.e.
But also psychological distress, causing extreme harm to both the mother and the child, if f.e. there is absolute rejection of the idea of wanting to identify and care for the child. You are basically ruining two lives at that point, with the counterpoint being, but at least there is one more person - alive, that gets a chance, and positively 'good' people could be caring about the child - you know like MEEEEEEEEE, at which point, the argument gets really creepy, but then - hey you'd save a life argument remains. Not in all cases, btw. because women in severe psychological distress also are known to not always give away their newborns to the stranger of your liking.
But still - you have a point. So we regulate into womens bodies and declare a fetus to become a child, even before they are born, and make abortion illegal in the third trimester.
All questions answered?
But child, and killing, and emotion and --- someone needs to post their outrage on the internets, quickly!
Get likeminded folks, start public protests, realize - that you are not in the majority (wanting to create more births, where the children are hated by their mothers, when they arrive), then read this text again.
To minimize those accurances, in the olden days, the church itself had to come up with a solution, btw. And it was chastity. As a virtue. So basically - behavior modification. As a result, women and men werent 'equal' at all. But hey - babies saved!
--
Now watch all of this getting ignored.