If we have full dive VR would there still be people living in real life? Maybe it comes down to personal preference? I am mainly referring to systems such as Neuralink, or Brain Computer Interfaces, not headsets.i.e sao, the matrix etc
Excluding factors such as morals and religion, eating and drinking, bodily functions, need for money(maybe we can make a living in VR?), need to reproduce.
Or we could have the majority people who spend the majority of time in the real world (in other words split time between real life and FIVR), or some people who spend their entire lives in full time.
Maybe the definition of reality could be extended to include VR metaverses as viable living spaces
In VR people can do things such as fly, and do magic effects which can't be done in the real world which increases their happiness. Or even people can have virtual girlfriends, kids or families.
Would we get a 75 percent uptake maybe?
Thanks
Excluding factors such as morals and religion, eating and drinking, bodily functions, need for money(maybe we can make a living in VR?), need to reproduce.
Or we could have the majority people who spend the majority of time in the real world (in other words split time between real life and FIVR), or some people who spend their entire lives in full time.
Maybe the definition of reality could be extended to include VR metaverses as viable living spaces
In VR people can do things such as fly, and do magic effects which can't be done in the real world which increases their happiness. Or even people can have virtual girlfriends, kids or families.
Would we get a 75 percent uptake maybe?
Thanks