All yes. NothingYou tried different cores? As in vulkan/glcore/gl
Hmm not sure then, Natehaxx said just on page 8 Gran tourismo and kingdom hearts both run fairly well if you barbeque your switch to 2ghz and max gpu. Unless a setting needs changing, maybe you have just got unlucky games. Maybe try disable vsync also?All yes. Nothing
I tried kindom hearts too. Same thing. Idk.Hmm not sure then, Natehaxx said just on page 8 Gran tourismo and kingdom hearts both run fairly well if you barbeque your switch to 2ghz and max gpu. Unless a setting needs changing, maybe you have just got unlucky games. Maybe try disable vsync also?
Are there other communities i can ask? Other sites? Gbatemp is the only one i can think of for things like this.I tried kindom hearts too. Same thing. Idk.
I tried all of them. If it means anything, too, I deleted the config files, as well, and overwrote what I was supposed to. Everything else still works fine.Check if it's open gl
That's strange it works here try to update lakka
Try android and Damonps2I just checked both aswell, kingdom hearts and king of fighters 2000-2001 both in .iso format neither work. Using both bootloader and lakka files from the download link on a freshly formatted clean fat32. Black screen then crash back to retroarch. Possibly not enough ram? Idk.
It sounds like you’re running the Homebrew menu from the photos applet.All yes. Nothing
This is on Linux, not on Horizon afaik.It sounds like you’re running the Homebrew menu from the photos applet.
You need to launch it by holding R and opening a game.
This is so the homebrew can take advantage of the extra RAM games are allocated.
You’ll need to do this for nearly all emulators, and in the case of RetroArch it’s recommended to restart it from the main menu before launching a new game.
Right you are, I just realised that.This is on Linux, not on Horizon afaik.
Thats ok , thanks for the suggestion though. Theres only a couple of ps2 i want to try. I honestly would only use android for that and i like to have a single emulation front for everything . Maybe i will give it a go to try it out at some point. But the core is completely broken when using it in L4T lakka, tried a fair amount of games and all give the same result, a black screen followed by return homescreen.Try android and Damonps2
I'm curious if this explains the comment by a dev about the Wii U "not being much more powerful than a Vita". Assuming he was referring exclusively to the main processor.This Vita performance notion is blatantly incorrect - at least, on paper.
The Vita has 3 usable (up to) 500MHz ARM cores that are on a more efficient process than the Wii's single 729MHz PPC CPU. The GPU is a bit slower, from what I'm aware (~200MHz vs 249MHz, though there is an alleged boost available if wireless is disabled) but has 128MB VRAM (more than the Wii had in total memory, 88MB, and much more than the Wii's 24MB VRAM) and is running at a similar resolution, 960x544 as opposed to ~640x480 - so this is just a lot more overhead with no additional pixel pushing necessary.
As I understand this is just a CPU discussion though, so it's worth pointing out that the Vita and Wii are both out-of-order but while the Wii is a superscalar processor, the Vita's Cortex A9 supports
Maybe? The Wii U CPU was almost double the speed of the Wii's for each core, which would make it in the ballpark of 5 or 6x more powerful if we total up the 3 cores. I don't understand why we're even comparing a 1.2GHz PowerPC chip with 3 cores to an ARM chip with 3 cores usable and one that runs at 333MHz by default (444MHz is possibly only when wireless is disabled..) honestly. Especially with a GPU that's 550MHz now vs the Vita's 166MHz (or 222MHz without wireless) GPU. Even if GHz is a bit of a myth for comparing things, it's not really a contest and the Wii U is the clear winner. To give you an idea, if we assume the Wii U and PS3 are similar in power, would he really say the PS3 is "not much more powerful than the Vita"?I'm curious if this explains the comment by a dev about the Wii U "not being much more powerful than a Vita". Assuming he was referring exclusively to the main processor.
IIRC, the Wii U CPU was just 3 slightly faster Wii's with triple-core multithreading and bigger, faster caches.
Both Gamecube and Wii were more powerful than the PS2, so it makes some senseDamn, so PS2 runs better then Gamecube and Wii?
Both Gamecube and Wii were more powerful than the PS2, so it makes some sense