This Maxwell thing is still a rumour.I would gladly pay 50 bucks more if that thing has a balanced hardware combo inside. but a damn old maxwell that is even cut and downclocked to its barely minimum... man! that's a bummer!
Switch is at about half the power of a GTX 1050Ti in terms of just FLOPs. More importantly, unless you get it on sale, a GTX 980Ti is still $300, and it's just a GPU. Switch is rumored to be ~$250 USD and is a complete device, designed to play most console ports just fine at 1080p/720p. UE4 numbers confirm. This type of price : performance ratio is attractive even to me as a PC gamer.under 10% of the performance a two year old GPU... does not sound THAT encouraging.
Maxwell have better ipc than Pascal and we don't know how much improvements 16nm will bring since every other NVidia GPU made with 16nm are Pascal.I would gladly pay 50 bucks more if that thing has a balanced hardware combo inside. but a damn old maxwell that is even cut and downclocked to its barely minimum... man! that's a bummer!
Nvidia's own blog calls it a "custom Tegra," so presumably based on X1. Thing is, with a custom chip based on X1 we could be looking at power anywhere from less half the performance of an XB1 to ~80% of that performance.It's not confirmed as being X1 or Maxwell or anything. Nobody knows.
USB 3.1 Gen 1 cannot handle Display Port natively or provide charge beyond 15w, and USB-C are typically 3.1 gen 2 or 2.0.
Edit: To rephrase everything.Again, what makes you think it will be gen 1? What possible reason is there to even use gen 1? Gen 1 was a technical limit that cannot be fixed in a software update, but there are no savings to be made by making gen 1 components now.
Cause gen 2 is 10Gbps, gen 1 is 5Gbps, and gen 1 controllers are likely to have more limitations and also keep in mind that the switch need to handle power delivery, dp, 2 usb 3.0 and usb 2.0 simultaneously.That still doesn't answer my question as to why you even brought up Gen 1.
Cause that guy says 5.0Gbps and that's usb 3.1 gen 1.That still doesn't answer my question. Is there any reason why we can't just accept, without relying on a bunch of technobabble, that the Switch itself is most likely using the latest spec? What need is there to even bring that up?
I apologize. There are several threads with similar topics and I lose track of which one I'm on.Cause that guy says 5.0Gbps and that's usb 3.1 gen 1.
Cause usb c is actually designed to go beyond usb 3.0 and to come with a even higher potential for growth, so everthing was really confusing.
I believe the part with dp cause usb c does just that. The thing is this controller is better than average one just because it pushes alternative modes simultanously.I apologize. There are several threads with similar topics and I lose track of which one I'm on.
I'm really questioning DisplayPort support though. HDMI is the standard for TVs, which 99.999% of the time the Switch will be connecting to.
I'm really questioning DisplayPort support though. HDMI is the standard for TVs said:I think DisplayPort is for the connection between the tablet and the dock. The DisplayPort in is then converted and outputed in HDMI for connection to all those TVs. I believe that the choice of USB C with DisplayPort is to minimise lag and speed up charging, but you'd need a tech expert to go into it further because I'm not sure exactly how it works, nor exactly what the dock does to convert to HDMI out.