Hardware New Switch rumours - 1440p TV and 1080p handheld - Displayport over USB-C - 5GBps BUS speed

naddel81

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
2,552
Trophies
1
XP
3,816
Country
United States
I would gladly pay 50 bucks more if that thing has a balanced hardware combo inside. but a damn old maxwell that is even cut and downclocked to its barely minimum... man! that's a bummer!
 

nmkd

Well-Known Member
OP
Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2016
Messages
554
Trophies
0
Age
26
XP
775
Country
Germany
I would gladly pay 50 bucks more if that thing has a balanced hardware combo inside. but a damn old maxwell that is even cut and downclocked to its barely minimum... man! that's a bummer!
This Maxwell thing is still a rumour.

Wait for January 12/13, Nvidia will probably give us some specs.

//Sent from my glorious OnePlus X
 

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,776
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,638
Country
United States
under 10% of the performance a two year old GPU... does not sound THAT encouraging.
Switch is at about half the power of a GTX 1050Ti in terms of just FLOPs. More importantly, unless you get it on sale, a GTX 980Ti is still $300, and it's just a GPU. Switch is rumored to be ~$250 USD and is a complete device, designed to play most console ports just fine at 1080p/720p. UE4 numbers confirm. This type of price : performance ratio is attractive even to me as a PC gamer.
 
Last edited by Xzi,

CeeDee

fuckin dork
Member
Joined
May 4, 2014
Messages
5,361
Trophies
3
XP
9,948
Country
United States
Y'all are stupid!

Obviously, the :switch: supports 720p undocked, and 240p docked.

It also doesn't support any backwards compatibility and has no Virtual Console, due to its lack of eShop. But they are bringing back the "Nintendo Power" cartridge burners from the 90s to burn games to your cartridge!* :yayswitch:

*Japan only.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrkBeam and nmkd

Yil

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
2,123
Trophies
0
XP
1,327
Country
Canada
USB 3.1 Gen 1 cannot handle Display Port natively or provide charge beyond 15w, and USB-C are typically 3.1 gen 2 or 2.0.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

I would gladly pay 50 bucks more if that thing has a balanced hardware combo inside. but a damn old maxwell that is even cut and downclocked to its barely minimum... man! that's a bummer!
Maxwell have better ipc than Pascal and we don't know how much improvements 16nm will bring since every other NVidia GPU made with 16nm are Pascal.
Edit: Just checked, Gen 1 have displayport 1.2a and sufficient power delivery.
 
Last edited by Yil,

duffmmann

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
3,966
Trophies
2
XP
2,306
Country
United States
seems like every rumor these days comes from a credible source despite claims from the various credible rumors being completely contradictory. At this point, I'm just disregarding all Switch rumor until at least the Switch event in January.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TotalInsanity4

Sizednochi

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
697
Trophies
1
XP
870
Country
Brazil
Venture Beat's specs were fake in case nobody saw. A guy sent a picture of a toaster to them and said it was a devkit.

It's not confirmed as being X1 or Maxwell or anything. Nobody knows.
 

Xzi

Time to fly, 621
Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
17,776
Trophies
3
Location
The Lands Between
Website
gbatemp.net
XP
8,638
Country
United States
It's not confirmed as being X1 or Maxwell or anything. Nobody knows.
Nvidia's own blog calls it a "custom Tegra," so presumably based on X1. Thing is, with a custom chip based on X1 we could be looking at power anywhere from less half the performance of an XB1 to ~80% of that performance.
 

Futurdreamz

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Messages
2,276
Trophies
1
Age
32
XP
2,129
Country
Canada
USB 3.1 Gen 1 cannot handle Display Port natively or provide charge beyond 15w, and USB-C are typically 3.1 gen 2 or 2.0.

Again, what makes you think it will be gen 1? What possible reason is there to even use gen 1? Gen 1 was a technical limit that cannot be fixed in a software update, but there are no savings to be made by making gen 1 components now.
 

Yil

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
2,123
Trophies
0
XP
1,327
Country
Canada
Again, what makes you think it will be gen 1? What possible reason is there to even use gen 1? Gen 1 was a technical limit that cannot be fixed in a software update, but there are no savings to be made by making gen 1 components now.
Edit: To rephrase everything.
USB C have 4 superspeed lanes that can be configured to run many different protocols, from a single lane of 5Gbps to the insane 40Gbps on thunderbolt 3 or 32.4 Gbps full speed dp 1.3/ 1.4, power lanes that either deliver up to 3A or 5A with better quality and support a wide range of 5V/ 9V/ 15V/ 20V. This even open up to possibility of a controller delivering several times of Thunderbolt 3's bandwidth while still using the same connectors and high quality cables.
Most commonly there are usb 3.1 gen1(5Gbps) and gen2(10Gbps), but some controllers will be able to use alternative configuration (thunderbolt 2.0 protocol for example uses 5Gbps x4) in addition to the existing lanes either simultaneously or only one. However, a good controller that support advanced power delivery that the switch is most likely made use of to hit 2.5x clock and able to run dp, two usb 3.0 and a usb 2.0 at the same time is much more likely to support USB 3.1 gen 2.
With MacBook 2015, there is dp protocol and the standard 3.1 gen1 but the power delivery is a step up from 5V * 3A.
 
Last edited by Yil,

Yil

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
2,123
Trophies
0
XP
1,327
Country
Canada
That still doesn't answer my question as to why you even brought up Gen 1.
Cause gen 2 is 10Gbps, gen 1 is 5Gbps, and gen 1 controllers are likely to have more limitations and also keep in mind that the switch need to handle power delivery, dp, 2 usb 3.0 and usb 2.0 simultaneously.
MacBook pro moved to thunderbolt 3.0 most likely due to older controllers not supporting laptop range power delivery in addition to making something more premium. A shame they got rid of sd card slot.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Display port 1.2a in itself requires at least one 5.4Gbps (i.e. Pcie 2.0, configurable up to x4) and 1.3 increase that to 8.1Gbps, and both can handle 4k.
So that itself means the port goes faster 5Gbps and that does not even include the two usb 3.0 port and a usb 2.0 cable, which requires at least another usb 3.0, so there's 10.4Gbps(which might be where it's at), but I don't think any available controller can do that. Also gen 1 controller most likely won't support the kind of power the switch need when docked. Let's say the power increase is quadratic, this means power consumption of cpu will become 6.25 times, and even if the switch is only 5w when in a tablet, that's already over 30 watts and the switch needs to be charged too while played.
 

Futurdreamz

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Messages
2,276
Trophies
1
Age
32
XP
2,129
Country
Canada
That still doesn't answer my question. Is there any reason why we can't just accept, without relying on a bunch of technobabble, that the Switch itself is most likely using the latest spec? What need is there to even bring that up?
 

Yil

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
2,123
Trophies
0
XP
1,327
Country
Canada
That still doesn't answer my question. Is there any reason why we can't just accept, without relying on a bunch of technobabble, that the Switch itself is most likely using the latest spec? What need is there to even bring that up?
Cause that guy says 5.0Gbps and that's usb 3.1 gen 1.
Cause usb c is actually designed to go beyond usb 3.0 and to come with a even higher potential for growth, so everthing was really confusing.
 

Futurdreamz

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Messages
2,276
Trophies
1
Age
32
XP
2,129
Country
Canada
Cause that guy says 5.0Gbps and that's usb 3.1 gen 1.
Cause usb c is actually designed to go beyond usb 3.0 and to come with a even higher potential for growth, so everthing was really confusing.
I apologize. There are several threads with similar topics and I lose track of which one I'm on.

I'm really questioning DisplayPort support though. HDMI is the standard for TVs, which 99.999% of the time the Switch will be connecting to.
 

Yil

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
2,123
Trophies
0
XP
1,327
Country
Canada
I apologize. There are several threads with similar topics and I lose track of which one I'm on.

I'm really questioning DisplayPort support though. HDMI is the standard for TVs, which 99.999% of the time the Switch will be connecting to.
I believe the part with dp cause usb c does just that. The thing is this controller is better than average one just because it pushes alternative modes simultanously.
 

Ikki Barri

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2015
Messages
108
Trophies
0
XP
163
Country
United States
I'm really questioning DisplayPort support though. HDMI is the standard for TVs said:
I think DisplayPort is for the connection between the tablet and the dock. The DisplayPort in is then converted and outputed in HDMI for connection to all those TVs. I believe that the choice of USB C with DisplayPort is to minimise lag and speed up charging, but you'd need a tech expert to go into it further because I'm not sure exactly how it works, nor exactly what the dock does to convert to HDMI out.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
    SylverReZ @ SylverReZ: @K3Nv2 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yWIobzBdKc