Yeah I guess I can't be more right than I already am. My apologies.
I wish you could hear yourself for a minute, because this just makes you sound even more arrogant and narcisistic than most of what you said before.
I never once said nor implied that. I literally said I need both banned and unbanned data. The advice I give does not and will not get people banned. All of the information I get also doesn't have to come from people following my advice.
Saying that you excluded something due to it causing bans to decline is exactly that.
You're once again twisting my words. I don't insist on people using Airplane Mode or DNS. Do you see that reinforced anywhere in the first post? No but you wouldn't know because you don't read everything I write or say because you're just cherrypicking words. My personal recommendation is to simply delete Wi-Fi settings because its the simplest and most effective method at preventing a connection to Nintendo's servers. I only recommend Airplane Mode or DNS settings if people are paranoid or want to make use of Wi-Fi without fear of getting banned which is not very often.
"Perform any and all hacking offline with the Wi-Fi settings deleted and Airplane Mode to prevent accidental connection to Nintendo Hotspots (think 3DS Spotpass)"
Your post fails to mention
better and newer methods of blocking access, on it's own that isn't the issue it could easily be remedied by ya know updating the list of methods.
The reason I say you are insisting on it is because when presented with information instead of updating your methods when presented with new information like many other sensible devs do, you decided to cough up this poor excuse:
"Because contrary to everyone's belief, these tools technically do not prevent bans. I know what you're thinking, you think I'm crazy. Tools like exosphere, dns.mitm, incognito don't prevent a ban, they mimic a ban; using them puts you in the state as if you were banned."
The methods aren't outdated. They still work perfectly fine in the year of 2022. Newer doesn't always mean better.
Newer isn't always better, the "betterness" of something is a function of its effectiveness. It's very much objective that a Connection specific DNS hosted by someone else and an offline mode known for disabling itself automatically is less effective than a System wide DNS operating in TrustZone combined with something that completely hides or destroys the unique identifiers and certificates.
I have never ever once stated that all homebrew is bad or everyone who uses homebrew no matter how they do it is destined to get banned.
Saying any and all hacking of a console definitely fits that definition well.
Here this should help with that foggy memory:
"
- Q: Can I get banned for hacking my Switch?
- A: Yes.
- Q: If I only use homebrew, can I get banned?
- A: Yes.
"
This is one of those moments to either elaborate or admit you're wrong.
Go ahead, about half of them are posts in this very thread so have fun sifting through 250+ pages to prove that all of the reports are indeed 100% legitimate. But my arrogance doesn't hold a candle to yours.
Nope Faulty Data is your problem not mine. It would be my problem if I were to do my own study but I'm not doing that, because I don't want to and I am not obligated to.
I will admit, this is the first mistake that I have made. I meant to say "banned". I'm not sure why I said "unbanned". Please accept my sincerest apologies.
Your first sentence was narcissistic self-righteous bullshit, that invalidates the sincereness of any apology you could've give, not that any of this was intended to be in any way meaningful (I know better than to expect an apology for anything from someone like you, and also this isn't the kind of thing that requires an apology). You're just salty that I won't go away and stop picking you apart.
You could've just said 'sorry that was a typo' and that would've been it and it would've been much easier.
Your answer does make it more fun though (and also beneficial to me
).
Well, SX OS is mostly on there as separate sections because people weren't sure if the first banwave was due to SX OS, Atmosphere, or other factors so in an effort to trace the origins of those initial bans, we checked to see if users used SX OS as well as how they used it. I wouldn't cite SX OS as an example of a CFW that is known to cause bans by itself for a number of reasons.
Yeah, SX OS isn't actually a great example of that since there aren't many people who were just using SX OS without mods, cheats, or backups. Although same kind of holds true nowadays for most people, majority of people either use CFW with mods (including signature patches) or not at all.
I mean, its a lengthy first post that people can and should read but if people need a tl;dr to just use emuMMC, it should just be in its own thread nor worth mentioning any other protections that the scene has developed.
You're right it should be in it's own thread, or its own guide. Definately not maintained by you of course
You just love putting words in my mouth don't you? I never said nor implied either of those things and I also couldn't care less about your opinions anyways.
lol *not* Sorry but you do act like you're special, I mean you've already thrown your post count in my face as a way of saying you're somehow special while also trying to seem threatening to me.
"I'm not glad to admit but you don't get this high of a post count just by acting as tech support."
How about this one?
"If you're the master, then I'm the creator."
So you don't think you're special but you spout crap like this and you expect me to believe otherwise?
I'm not putting words in your mouth, I'm taking the that words you said out of your mouth and using them against you.
Funny thing about words, they're like a tube of toothpaste once you squeeze them out they won't go back in.
No, I'm trying to prove that I'm a boon to the well being of new users by giving them objectively good advice that'll likely not get them banned.
It's only objectively good advice if the assumption that it's not going to break down at some point is actually true, DNS servers are inherantly less reliable due to their remote nature and the fact that they are connection specific, Airplane Mode is even less reliable (can self disable very easily). Of coarse I've already told you all this before.
You believe you're always right though (you've shown me as such, I'd add quotes here but they're already added above) and there's nothing that can help with this level of arrogance and self-righteousness.
It is hilarious because you think you're in the right here when you couldn't be anymore wrong. Honestly, if you were just trolling, that might save you more face than if you were being unironically serious about what you were saying.
If only you hadn't already proven yourself to be and arrogant narcissist with your many comments throughout this thread this may have had some significance. I'd quote them here but I already quoted them with my other replies in this post.