its funny really.. if someone defends sxos then = tx employee ... now user defends atmo = atmo user... didint know that, thanks.A lot of the TX employee's here won't even concede that.
its funny really.. if someone defends sxos then = tx employee ... now user defends atmo = atmo user... didint know that, thanks.A lot of the TX employee's here won't even concede that.
It was simple to use back then, I use to use it myself. Two of the main issues that I remember very well were the janky macOS archive bit shit (which was and still is also an issue with SXOS btw) and some people found it difficult to actually get into RCM and push a payload. For most people who knew what they were doing it just worked(tm)That may be but was NOT in its easy to use form at the time. As I recall if you wanted help back then you always got the HATE "You could have searched for your answer" reply. This turned a lot of inexperienced users to using a simpler solution which was SX.
I didn't say you are all TX employees, but some people are undoubtedly TX plants. You could dissuade my suspicions by recommending that no one buy SX OS until 7.0.x support is released.its funny really.. if someone defends sxos then = tx employee ... now atmo user = atmo user... didint know that, thanks.
As i have stated before.. i use rei so i dont go to either side of the fanboy drama i just talk becuase i feel people bash sxos for whatever they can think.I didn't say you are all TX employees, but some people are undoubtedly TX plants. You could dissuade my suspicions by recommending that no one buy SX OS until 7.0.x support is released.
First, that didn't sound like a recommendation to me. Second, there can't be Atmosphere plants because it's not created by a company with profit motives.As i have stated before.. i use rei so i dont go to either side of the fanboy drama i just talk becuase i feel people bash sxos for whatever they can think.
and again.. some people are undoubtedly tx plants.. but 0 atmo ? .. why
Employees? Or overly entitled customers butthurt that the great TX can't yet get them out of their self-inflicted 7.0.1 hole? (Who are too lazy to even have a go at getting Atmo working.)TX employees
? do you read what i write ? when did i recommend something ? ... and yes.. if sxos can have " employees " then atmo can have " fanboys "First, that didn't sound like a recommendation to me. Second, there can't be Atmosphere plants because it's not created by a company with profit motives.
It's probably a combination of the twoEmployees? Or overly entitled customers butthurt that the great TX can't yet get them out of their self-inflicted 7.0.1 hole? (Who are too lazy to even have a go at getting Atmo working.)
I asked if you could make the above recommendation.? do you read what i write ? when did i recommend something ? ... and yes.. if sxos can have " employees " then atmo can have " fanboys "
49 days and counting, so there's plenty of time.4 pages to go.
First, that's not necessarily a bad thing if all they're doing is acknowledging the very real shortcomings of SX OS. Second, that's not all this thread has been, and you know it.Change the title of the thread to atmo fanboys bashing sxos for delay on update. its they thread now.
I get that, but I just don't agree with it. I don't see a gap in difficulty between SXOS and Kosmos. Both can be explained in a YouTube video months ago and the steps shown in the guide would work today. Except SXOS wouldn't work for a user on 7.X.
Configuring raw, Github Atmopshere does involve extracting more stuff to mSD than the SXOS zip, but extracting Kosmos and extracting SXOS are the same task with the same level of (not) difficulty.
ok.. will go to atmo threads to talk about the shorcomings of it. after all.. its not a bad thing to do.First, that's not necessarily a bad thing if all they're doing is acknowledging the very real shortcomings of SX OS. Second, that's not all this thread has been, and you know it.
The topic of the thread is a specific shortcoming (lack of 7.0.x support). Nice try.ok.. will go to atmo threads to talk about the shorcomings of it. after all.. its not a bad thing to do.
no.. you really dont read.. the thread is called " confirmed no roadblocks for 7.0.1 support on sxos.. it doesnt say anywhare the shortcomings of sxos.. so go on your way..The topic of the thread is a specific shortcoming (lack of 7.0.x support). Nice try.
I didn't say you are all TX employees, but some people are undoubtedly TX plants. You could dissuade my suspicions by recommending that no one buy SX OS until 7.0.x support is released.
The topic of the thread is a specific shortcoming (lack of 7.0.x support). Nice try.
If you can't read guides and follow steps no piracy for you. As simple as that. This is applicable to many other areas aswell. Piracy isn't even a need. If people can't live without games they should go work to earn the games supporting the game devs instead of supporting shady buisinesses.All the people on here saying ''setting it up is easy''... No, no it's not - TO OTHER PEOPLE. Not everyone on here could service their car I bet, the mechanics would all be laughing at how useless you are because you don't know simple mechanical steps. Same principle.