Clickbait.
Ah, I see now, I should've read that more carefullyClickbait.
Similar legislation is still pending in the Senate, where it has substantial support. After Senate passage, it will still need to be signed into law by President Donald Trump.
This has nothing to do with net neutrality. It has nothing to do with the way you access the net, and more to do with what you can say, and how services handle content by users on their sites.FYI guys your ISP knows when you're using a VPN. With Net Neutrality gone, expect extra costs associated with VPNs in the not-too-distant future.
Net Neutrality prevented fast lanes and extra surcharges from your ISP associated with "premium" internet services. With it gone, ISPs can charge however much they want for whatever they want. With Comcast and Time Warner being the two big providers, expect all sorts of shitty behavior. If they're charging more for "fast lanes," they're not going to let you circumvent that with your "slow lane" subscription and a VPN for no cost.This has nothing to do with net neutrality. It has nothing to do with the way you access the net, and more to do with what you can say, and how services handle content by users on their sites.
No he's referring to this bill, not the VPN thingNet Neutrality prevented fast lanes and extra surcharges from your ISP associated with "premium" internet services. With it gone, ISPs can charge however much they want for whatever they want. With Comcast and Time Warner being the two big providers, expect all sorts of shitty behavior. If they're charging more for "fast lanes," they're not going to let you circumvent that with your "slow lane" subscription and a VPN for no cost.
Oh I gotcha. Well it's all bullshit. Bunch of people older than my grandparents trying to dictate how the internet should work without knowing the first thing about it.No he's referring to this bill, not the VPN thing
kek, if that sort of throttling ever happens, you'd better bet I'm gonna pull some tricky shadowsocks proxy voodoo.Net Neutrality prevented fast lanes and extra surcharges from your ISP associated with "premium" internet services. With it gone, ISPs can charge however much they want for whatever they want. With Comcast and Time Warner being the two big providers, expect all sorts of shitty behavior. If they're charging more for "fast lanes," they're not going to let you circumvent that with your "slow lane" subscription and a VPN for no cost.
I'm confused as to how this is "censorship." From what I can tell, this only applies to postings related to sex trafficking...
While there is definitely the danger of people in positions of power abusing their authority, I fail to see why that should prevent lawmakers from writing laws designed specifically to protect people, even if they may be misused in a small percentage of casesAnd you don't think for a second that this could be easily abused and the could pass anything off they don't like as offensive?
Congress can eat a bag of dicks.
I fail to see why that should prevent lawmakers from writing laws designed specifically to protect people, even if they may be misused in a small percentage of cases
You give them an inch they take a mile, TI.While there is definitely the danger of people in positions of power abusing their authority, I fail to see why that should prevent lawmakers from writing laws designed specifically to protect people, even if they may be misused in a small percentage of cases
The thing is the law could have been written to be far more specific to help those particular situations you have in mind. The vague and general wording gives wide-sweeping and overwhelming power. While it may not be used poorly right away, it allows for really shitty scenarios in a legal and less-than-stellar way.While there is definitely the danger of people in positions of power abusing their authority, I fail to see why that should prevent lawmakers from writing laws designed specifically to protect people, even if they may be misused in a small percentage of cases
While there is definitely the danger of people in positions of power abusing their authority, I fail to see why that should prevent lawmakers from writing laws designed specifically to protect people, even if they may be misused in a small percentage of cases
I suppose you'd be fine without a penalty for murder or theft, then?...So why should people trust lawmakers and politicians instead of people being responsible for themselves.
Ok THIS I can agree withThe thing is the law could have been written to be far more specific to help those particular situations you have in mind. The vague and general wording gives wide-sweeping and overwhelming power. While it may not be used poorly right away, it allows for really shitty scenarios in a legal and less-than-stellar way.
good old late 80's to about 2009Remember when the internet was fun? Good times.
Christ dude calm downBangs laptop chassis* This is gonna suck... I'm doing everything in my power to help. It gonna kill the temp, chary and any other American based mods might get arrested. We as a website must stand up and get others to join us too. I will not be silenced!!! THIS IS INSANE #savethetemp #savethefirstamendement #savethenet
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
good old late 80's to about 2009
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
THIS COULD BE AN APRIL FOOLS JOKE