Emulation [RELEASE] Cemu - Wii U emulator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Exzap
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 7,767,016
  • Replies Replies 21,671
  • Likes Likes 284
You need to get the game somewhere else (obviously, I mean buy it ;) ). No one here will (or is allowed to) tell you where to get an illegal copy.
 
Where did you see the Ryzen comparable to the Haswell @Xalphenos?
Well Perhaps I should clarify. What I meant by my original post was that based on what I have read I personally have come to the conclusion that ryzen ipc is at least as good as haswell. There is actually very little direct comparisons I've found between the two. But here is my line of thinking going from probably least convincing to most convincing.

1. Based on plenty of reviews it is generally accepted that haswell is about 10% faster than Sandy bridge and Kaby Lake is about another 10% faster than that. I'm rounding of course and it depends on what the workload consists of. Also many of the reviewers that have reviewed ryzen at launch have shown it to be about 6 to 10% slower than kaby lake at gaming where ryzen can't leverage it's higher core count as much. So by deduction on lightly threaded applications ryzen should be at least as good as haswell.

2. In more highly threaded applications Ryzen typically beats a broadwell-e 6900k. Broadwell being just the die shrink of haswell.

3. In Gamersnexus' review of the ryzen 7 1800x you can occasionally find a haswell cpu tossed into the mix. The best example is in the cinebench r15 test. Looking at the single threaded results the 1800x and 4690k has them within a point of each other. I feel these two are the most significant because the 4690k is 3.5ghz with a 3.9ghz turbo and the ryzen is 100mhz faster on both. So they are the closest in clock speed of the tested cpus. The 4790k gets about 30 points ahead of them but it is also 400mhz faster then the 1800x. The intel chips here are both devils canyon which is the haswell refresh.

So for these reasons I've come to the conclusion that ryzen ipc is at least as good as haswell. Unfortunately not a lot of reviewers are testing it against older core i cpus which I personally think a lot of people would find more interesting then everyone comparing it with the 7700k and the 6900k. It just seems to me that there are still a lot of people out there gaming on 2500k and 4570k cpus and I personally would like to see how good an upgrade ryzen would be for those people. To see if it's worth taking a gamble on pc gaming become hugely more multi threaded in the coming years. For today the 7700k or the 7600k would be the better gaming cpus. Maybe not tomorrow though. And if ryzen could be a significant enough upgrade from my oc sandy bridge for me to really feel like I upgraded I think I would take that gamble this time. I did not last time and it paid off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Molhel
Well Perhaps I should clarify. What I meant by my original post was that based on what I have read I personally have come to the conclusion that ryzen ipc is at least as good as haswell. There is actually very little direct comparisons I've found between the two. But here is my line of thinking going from probably least convincing to most convincing.

1. Based on plenty of reviews it is generally accepted that haswell is about 10% faster than Sandy bridge and Kaby Lake is about another 10% faster than that. I'm rounding of course and it depends on what the workload consists of. Also many of the reviewers that have reviewed ryzen at launch have shown it to be about 6 to 10% slower than kaby lake at gaming where ryzen can't leverage it's higher core count as much. So by deduction on lightly threaded applications ryzen should be at least as good as haswell.

2. In more highly threaded applications Ryzen typically beats a broadwell-e 6900k. Broadwell being just the die shrink of haswell.

3. In Gamersnexus' review of the ryzen 7 1800x you can occasionally find a haswell cpu tossed into the mix. The best example is in the cinebench r15 test. Looking at the single threaded results the 1800x and 4690k has them within a point of each other. I feel these two are the most significant because the 4690k is 3.5ghz with a 3.9ghz turbo and the ryzen is 100mhz faster on both. So they are the closest in clock speed of the tested cpus. The 4790k gets about 30 points ahead of them but it is also 400mhz faster then the 1800x. The intel chips here are both devils canyon which is the haswell refresh.

So for these reasons I've come to the conclusion that ryzen ipc is at least as good as haswell. Unfortunately not a lot of reviewers are testing it against older core i cpus which I personally think a lot of people would find more interesting then everyone comparing it with the 7700k and the 6900k. It just seems to me that there are still a lot of people out there gaming on 2500k and 4570k cpus and I personally would like to see how good an upgrade ryzen would be for those people. To see if it's worth taking a gamble on pc gaming become hugely more multi threaded in the coming years. For today the 7700k or the 7600k would be the better gaming cpus. Maybe not tomorrow though. And if ryzen could be a significant enough upgrade from my oc sandy bridge for me to really feel like I upgraded I think I would take that gamble this time. I did not last time and it paid off.

I upgraded from a 4570 (non k) and so far it's been a great upgrade. Only thing running slower is this emulator, at least that I noticed. Overwatch is much faster now even with the same GPU.

Pretty much i5 when it comes to single threaded applications, i7 when it comes to threaded stuff.

I've seen videos of the i5-7400 running Mario Kart pretty much locked at 60 and the 1700X should be faster in all circumstances. http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-7400-vs-AMD-Ryzen-7-1700X/3886vs3915


Could You disable 4 cores and Test Mario Kart again please?
Maybe it's because of the CCX

I'll put it on my todo list, but I tested setting the affinity to certain cores and it didn't seem to matter.
 
smash 4 dark lightning "fix" for nvidia users !

Woolly World works with it too with a few minor adjustments.

ZKzJ1TV.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: YamGaming
Ive been trying to get Botw to start in cemu, i get to the startmenu of the game and then i get Wii u emulator has stopped working. Is it easier to just buy the game and from that make it run on my pc?
 
How can i be a member? I want to play botw not stolen

Buy it from a store, load it up on your WiiU, then dump it.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------

Ive been trying to get Botw to start in cemu, i get to the startmenu of the game and then i get Wii u emulator has stopped working. Is it easier to just buy the game and from that make it run on my pc?

Are you a Patron? BotW only works on Cemu 1.7.3 onwards, which is the Patron only version until the end of the week, and even then it has lots of problems.
 
Buy it from a store, load it up on your WiiU, then dump it.

--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------



Are you a Patron? BotW only works on Cemu 1.7.3 onwards, which is the Patron only version until the end of the week, and even then it has lots of problems.

Yes i am a patron, have tried three different games and everytime i get that wii u emulator has stopped working.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum