Just get him his own Switch. Problem solved.My friend's demon little brother sold his life to that game. At this point he's probably spent over 500 dollars on it and he's only 12. The game corrupted him.
Well... I guess he's always been a demon but he's especially demonic when he can't have his turn on the Switch to play Fortnite. Not something you want to deal with when you're trying to get in practice the night before a concert.
Jokes aside, it's really terrible what Epic's monetization strategy for Fortnite has done to people. It traps in people susceptible to addiction and absolutely destroys incomes. Of course, this is a problem with the game industry as a whole obviously and other games have been worse with lootboxes, but that certainley doesn't make Epic innocent.
What do you mean? It always said that. Always has been that, if you will.
Wait, epic game store was the one that had rocket league on there but some how unable to purchase on steam all of a sudden?
Are there more games like this case?
I think there are many who would readily agree that Steam is doing a pretty crappy job with regulation and that there are a lot of things that really shouldn't be sold on Steam on account of being buggy, content-free asset-flips that are genuinely devoid of merit except for a means of funneling money to the "developer".For starters, without capitalism or a free market, you guys would be stuck with just Steam, except it'd be nationalized and owned by the government, and the games on there would be regulated to Hell and back
I am not an economist, but isn't the whole point that a few people definitely should not be "just as fine" as they are right now, and a whole lot of people are not "fine" at all?I ask you this; what would you do to make sure that people would be just as fine as they are under capitalism as they would be under your ideal world?
I think there are many who would readily agree that Steam is doing a pretty crappy job with regulation and that there are a lot of things that really shouldn't be sold on Steam on account of being buggy, content-free asset-flips that are genuinely devoid of merit except for a means of funneling money to the "developer".
Well it's not so much of a problem of him hogging the switch as he's pretty much the only one who uses it, it's moreso a problem of him wanting to spend so much money on the game and throwing massive fits if he doesn't get what he wantsJust get him his own Switch. Problem solved.
Because it doesn't have user reviews, this is an even bigger problem on EGS. So many of their games rate at a 60 or below on metacritic, including some of those they paid out exclusivity contracts for.I think there are many who would readily agree that Steam is doing a pretty crappy job with regulation and that there are a lot of things that really shouldn't be sold on Steam on account of being buggy, content-free asset-flips that are genuinely devoid of merit except for a means of funneling money to the "developer".
Because it doesn't have user reviews, this is an even bigger problem on EGS. So many of their games rate at a 60 or below on metacritic, including some of those they paid out exclusivity contracts for.
Steam Greenlight ceased to be a thing three years ago.and if Steam Greenlight has the reputation its gained due to people abusing things
Except when a company puts out an unsatisfactory product in any other part of the market, eventually the product disappears and people don't have to think about it anymore. Everything on Steam lingers, and more and more stuff is added every day.customers should decide for themselves to not give money or support to these projects, and to let them die out like they should when a company puts out an unsatisfactory product in any other part of the market. The gold will rise to the top, while the fool's gold will burn up!
Interesting. Come to think of it, I remember being really intrigued by SuperMash, to which reviews have been most unkind. (It is no longer exclusive.)Because it doesn't have user reviews, this is an even bigger problem on EGS. So many of their games rate at a 60 or below on metacritic, including some of those they paid out exclusivity contracts for.
Stuff like Rune 2 and Shenmue 3, yeah.For real!? The games they pay for timed exclusivity score at a 60 and below!?
Sure, you can always find at least a few detailed user reviews on page one of any Steam game. The overall score usually gives you a pretty good idea of the game's level of polish if nothing else, also.But I don't think user reviews are a solution there. I mean, do you bother reading user reviews much? Would you rely on them in making a purchase instead of Googling for an (ostensibly) professional review?
This is a crime against gamer-kind,you will now be crucifiedunpopular opinion time
i love epic games.
i think the launcher is visibly pleasing to look at, super simple to use. sure it lacks some features but i never liked comment sections anyway.
not to mention, free games. i could sell my epic account with all my free games on there.
of course there are things that could be better, but for me? i don't give a flying FUCK if the developers or the producers or whatever are not getting their moola. it's not my issue, and i'd still play minecraft if it was made by poor people. (don't comment on that last comment, it's not meant to be discussed because i know what people like to do and they like to pick apart things they think are dumb so i'm gonna stretch this post a little bit longer and say don't comment about it.)
thank you for your time
your opinions are valued.
tl;dr
i like epic games.
Tim Sweeney already paid for your copy, so get it the other way . Just buy it when it hits Steam, if you wanna support Square.now i hate Shitty Epic more than before.......i mean Kingdom Hearts comes for PC and its FUCKING EPIC EXCLUSIVE?...FUCK U EPIC
....i dont know what to do i am a die hard KH Fan but its on Epic...aaaaaaa