The difference is that devs actually make money on PlayStation. That's fine in my book. EGS has literally nothing going for it, and is being kept on life support by Epic pouring money into bribes. It's not a business model that can work long term, it doesn't help anyone. I know Epic hopes that eventually enough people will be using EGS because of all the free games and exclusives, so that they can compete with Steam. But for that to happen, I think they're gonna need something more than just a bunch of exclusives and free games. They're gonna need a reason for people to stay.
Just bribing people and putting zero effort into making something worth using is just lazy. The way they're trying to force EGS becoming popular is just a dick move. Sony worked hard to make PS popular.
A bribe is at the very least illegal or strongly immoral.
Saying we will pay you/give you a better cut/invest in your development and advertising for exclusivity, a deal which they are perfectly free to say "no thanks" to... is not that.
Going to need more than content?
... I mean I suppose a demented, though they might say dedicated, group of sycophants and fanboys is not necessarily a bad position to be in.
I am also struggling to get to dick move for this. If you can't make your own content fast enough to be a distribution platform then you buy it in... that is generally how the entertainment industry has worked since... I have examples books that did that in the late 1700s and it was all the rage by the mid 1800s.
There have been plenty of others seeking to compete with Steam. None had more than their little slice of content and thus people continued to ignore them because convenience. If you are going to break into a saturated market and go up against a monopoly then you have to make the big play.
From where I sit Steam are not owed my loyalty (indeed I actively avoid having an account). They are a parasite like all the others, they stopped lending of games, kicked second hand PC games hard in the nuts to where it is still reeling (being delisted would be no problem if such things were common), have played censor and have played gatekeeper. All major negatives.
If people are willing to sacrifice all that to spare them having to hold the devs to account to use common controllers (that OSes provide ample support for) and because they are too lazy to point one of the billion online storage options at their game saves folder... I knew gamers were by and large cheap bastards but I still thought sterner stuff.
The idea of giving over distribution on a medium to a single given for profit company... *shudders*.
Re Epic vs Apple. I don't necessarily think they had much of a legal leg to stand on but I sure don't like Apple's position as gatekeeper and arbiter of my would be computer.