Why can't staff members be set onto ones ignore list ?
*Puts Advocatus Diaboli hat on*
I mean: Is there a "logical" reason ?
Aside certain prompts that pertain violations and very important news (those might be relayed via TempBot if said staff member is "ignored"),
I see no reason why this should not be possible.
Further elaboration:
There is no reason a function that applies globally to the temp as whole should exempt certain individuals
even staff. (Aside Costello and shaun66 for obvious reasons, it's their castle)
Especially since blocking and ignoring are entirely different concepts
With Gbatemp -luckily- implementing the latter. Which merly conceals content.
Thoughts ?
(I'd prefer staff member responses.. I don't want this to turn i to a discussion with multiple participants
Getting multiple staff member replies would be nice.)
PS: Apparantly even the Editorial team is so "staff" that this exemption applies.
PPS: Asking out of ... curiosity..
*Puts Advocatus Diaboli hat on*
I mean: Is there a "logical" reason ?
Aside certain prompts that pertain violations and very important news (those might be relayed via TempBot if said staff member is "ignored"),
I see no reason why this should not be possible.
Further elaboration:
There is no reason a function that applies globally to the temp as whole should exempt certain individuals
even staff. (Aside Costello and shaun66 for obvious reasons, it's their castle)
Especially since blocking and ignoring are entirely different concepts
With Gbatemp -luckily- implementing the latter. Which merly conceals content.
Thoughts ?
(I'd prefer staff member responses.. I don't want this to turn i to a discussion with multiple participants
Getting multiple staff member replies would be nice.)
PS: Apparantly even the Editorial team is so "staff" that this exemption applies.
PPS: Asking out of ... curiosity..