Then just use emunand or feel free to switch to atmosphere anytime.yes but if u dont use emunand u screwed under sx
Ah man, I know right. I just love SX's heavily outdated fork of stratosphere (ams' sysmodules), lack of custom Secure Monitor, lack of very useful debugging tools, factually inferior cheat engine, Gateway's horrible communication with theirthe fact that SXOS is still the superior custom firmware
yes but there are people who dont waste 32gb on emunand
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
or howmany gb it was
Ah man, I know right. I just love SX's heavily outdated fork of stratosphere (ams' sysmodules), lack of custom Secure Monitor, factually inferior cheat engine, Gateway's horrible communication with theirshillscustomers, SX's DRM (drm on a cfw lol), inability to load additional custom sysmodules, it being incredibly late to get updates for literally no reason, the fact that it pointlessly costs money, the fact that it actively breaks licenses on various homebrew projects, it being illegal to distribute due to it containing some Nintendo's code, the fact that Gateway works with people who are incredibly toxic, and probably more that I don't remember at the moment
If it works for you and others, great , I don't have any issues with that. My issue it when people say complete bullcrap (ex. that other person saying SX is factually the best when in fact it is not in most aspects)Yes but SX is still working good, thanks to your technical points but end-users wouldn't care that much.
SX users could switch to Atmosphere anytime but not now until emunand support comes to Atmosphere, it might be.
If it works for you and others, great , I don't have any issues with that. My issue it when people say complete bullcrap (ex. that other person saying SX is factually the best when in fact it is not in most aspects)
emuNAND is only an important feature to people who pay for online play, and for some of them, it's not worth the financial (or moral) price tag of SX OS. emuNAND is also coming to Atmosphere eventually.Atmosphere zombies literally just trying to say EmuNAND isn't an important feature. Oh lordy.
Again, if it works as you want it too, then great. But just because it does what you and a few others want, doesn't make it factually the bestTechnically, it works as it should be. Why do people care about other aspects that don't affect to their experiences?
- SX OS doesn't support 7.0.0 and higher.
- That's possible, but TX would have to independently break TSEC, and that's easier said than done. They've also never demonstrated the ability to do something like that.
You can install NSP files from a computer using a USB connection and Atmosphere.I have SX and the only thing I'd miss is usb installation, which for whatever reason doesn't work on the other cfw. Emunand don't care, banned, usb loading don't care, 400gb sd. USB Installation is convenient. But what would really bum me out as SX user is when there's a 7.0 game coming that you can't patch to work on 6.2. Once that happens, I'll be gone.
I wanted to sardonically respond just by saying, "So?" because few people care about those features. In other words, 7.0.x support is much more important than whether or not I can load an XCI file.Okey then atmosphere or rei or any other os has never demostrated the ability to do something like hdd suport or xci loading..
So just because the devs doesnt care then its okay but when sxos doesnt have 7.0.1 support its bad ? and if its so easy to break why havent we seen it in any other os ?I wanted to sardonically respond just by saying, "So?" because few people care about those features. In other words, 7.0.x support is much more important than whether or not I can load an XCI file.
Instead, I thought it would be better to point out that these things are much easier than breaking TSEC. Also, speaking only about Atmosphere for a moment, the developers don't care one bit about these two things. That's the hurdle.
Gateway's 3DS files would like to have a word with your XCI files.Citation Needed.
Uh... PNG files would like a word with WAD files...? Your non-sequitur is baffling.Gateway's 3DS files would like to have a word with your XCI files.
Because if TX doesn't care about adding 7.0.x support, then they're abandoning SX OS and its users.So just because the devs doesnt care then its okay but when sxos doesnt have 7.0.1 support its bad ?
I'm going to pretend you don't know what I'm talking about, because your response doesn't make sense otherwise. Gateway was a 3DS flashcart that used 3DS files that are analogous to XCI files. When CIA files (analogous to NSP files) became popular, people preferred them over 3DS files because they were free to use.Uh... PNG files would like a word with WAD files...? Your non-sequitur is baffling.