Tennessee poised to ban public drag shows, hormone therapy for children

[Deleted member 586536]

2. the second lie, and the one that makes this argument bunk is you know you are wrong about this but you obsess over woke shit for some reason is very simple, because even you would never condone of or approve of relationships with children because they arent capable of consent, so by that logic, they arent when it comes to life altering surgeries, you know this, which is why you brought up the pedo thing, and are lying about it now, no one cares about who you are or if you are a pedo or not, i care that you lie about things that are obviously lies. I tried to avoid having it come to this for your sake, but you opened the door, im walking through it.

So your just strawmaning *sigh*
A. Children aren't getting surgeries. 18 year olds can.
B. pre teens with parental approval, and several checks with doctors, get hormone thearpy.
C. actual children (ages 1-11)
Only get a name change, and different clothes.

Also:
"nobody cares if your a pedo or not"
So then why throw out the accusation at me? Calling someone a pedophile is not something to be done lightly.

 

[lolcatzuru]

So your just strawmaning *sigh*
A. Children aren't getting surgeries. 18 year olds can.
B. pre teens with parental approval, and several checks with doctors, get hormone thearpy.
C. actual children (ages 1-11)
Only get a name change, and different clothes.

Also:
"nobody cares if your a pedo or not"
So then why throw out the accusation at me? Calling someone a pedophile is not something to be done lightly.

when did i do that? can you show me because if i did then i genuinely apologize for that, i would never accuse someone of that, i even said in a few posts back that i know you dont support that, so can you show me where i did?

i dont know what that means, but

A. yes they absolutely are.

B. it wouldnt matter if the parents approve, the child can't consent

C. you should be angry about this point.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

ou literally just proved my point for me, it is different because he's a well known actor, his career was ruined as a result.

Defemation has two different standards. Public figures have more scruitny because they are, infact, public figures. People that are not public figures have a less of a higher bar.

 

[lolcatzuru]

Defemation has two different standards. Public figures have more scruitny because they are, infact, public figures. People that are not public figures have a less of a higher bar.

so then are you currently in litigation with that person and if not, why not?

 

[Hanafuda]

so how would you write the law then?

I said "if" ... whether it really is that vague and ambiguous is another matter.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

so then are you currently in litigation with that person and if not, why not?

1. I said "if possible"
I don't exactly have a whole ton of money. So it would take time for me to actually do that. And I'd still need to confront a lawyer to ensure I'm not throwing a lawsuit that's going to go nowhere if I don't met the standards.

2. they haven't said groomer again.

For context, calliing someone a groomer, is infact, the same as calling them a pedophile. Given that I have no criminal record or history. And you if you looked up on that sex offender record, and how I don't show up in it. And because I'm you know, not a pedophile, it's a pretty open and shut case.

 

[lolcatzuru]

I said "if" ... whether it really is that vague and ambiguous is another matter.

what if i told you it is in fact, pretty cut and dry. even if it werent, no one has been able to explain to me yet why men need to perform drag shows for kids.

 

[smf]

Wow do people get scared easily these days. Banning drag shows? Good lord, its like they think if a child even observes a man in woman's clothes that they'll immediately become gay or trans or whatever their deep fear is.

People want to ban drag shows because they want to be drag queens but feel shame about it.

what if i told you it is in fact, pretty cut and dry. even if it werent, no one has been able to explain to me yet why men need to perform drag shows for kids.

You haven't been able to explain to me why men dressing up as women is controversial. In Shakespears day it was illegal for women to appear on stage, so all female parts were played by men. Men also traditionally dress up as women in British and Irish Pantomime. Suggesting that men shouldn't be allowed to dress up as women, seems like you have severe control issues.

What made you choose to be a fascist?

 

[Foxi4]

what does it mean for something to be "imperially" correct?

The Imperial Truth is imperially correct, so it is declared by our God Emperor who sits atop the Golden Throne. The Emperor protects!

Jokes aside, I’m not sure why the two issues are lumped together. It’s a weird pairing.

 

[Kitocco]

wow a group of doctos said that extremely expensive medical treatments are important, im SHOCKED. Do you have a source for it not being pushed on kids?

Do you have any source that it IS?
And no, a microblog from a site where nuance goes to die that mis-reports clips from TikTok or spreads false info about a hospital doesn’t count.
Also interesting how you went from “they’re delusions of people who wanna LARP” (they’re not) to “prove this panic wrong”.

And of course, complete silence in the face of bikinis At the beach, “take your kids to Hooters”, fucking old Disney cartoons being weirdly revealing ant times (Great Mouse Detective’s bar dance scene, anyone?) etc. etc.
Telling kids “these sorts of people exist & it’s ok to feel these other ways” is ”grooming” unless it’s the status-quo-sanctioned right kind of people (cis & heterosexual)

With that, from David Wojnarowicz:

 

[lolcatzuru]

Do you have any source that it IS?
And no, a microblog from a site where nuance goes to die that mis-reports clips from TikTok or spreads false info about a hospital doesn’t count.
Also interesting how you went from “they’re delusions of people who wanna LARP” (they’re not) to “prove this panic wrong”.

And of course, complete silence in the face of bikinis At the beach, “take your kids to Hooters”, fucking old Disney cartoons being weirdly revealing ant times (Great Mouse Detective’s bar dance scene, anyone?) etc. etc.
Telling kids “these sorts of people exist & it’s ok to feel these other ways” is ”grooming” unless it’s the status-quo-sanctioned right kind of people (cis & heterosexual)

With that, from David Wojnarowicz:

yea what was their name? stacy or whatever? the one you guys dont like to talk about? i also dont have any kids so idk wtf you are talking with any of that. Sure ill back that too, lets go back to one pieces at the beach, your people pushed for bikinis not me.

 

[Hanafuda]

what if i told you it is in fact, pretty cut and dry. even if it werent, no one has been able to explain to me yet why men need to perform drag shows for kids.

Yeah I asked that too. Nobody wants to answer that.

 

[lolcatzuru]

Yeah I asked that too. Nobody wants to answer that.

The Imperial Truth is imperially correct, so it is declared by our God Emperor who sits atop the Golden Throne. The Emperor protects!

Jokes aside, I’m not sure why the two issues are lumped together. It’s a weird pairing.

hey that kid doxxed himself earlier you might wanna look into that

 

[Foxi4]

hey that kid doxxed himself earlier you might wanna look into that

It’s long gone.

 

[lolcatzuru]

It’s long gone.

thats good to hear, i dont wanna tell you how to do your job but that kid has a habit of doing crazy things and embarressing themselves, might be worth making him retire.

 

[Deleted member 586536]

hey that kid doxxed himself earlier you might wanna look into that

It’s long gone.

I'd like to not do that. But given that I've been called a "groomer" several damn times now. I'm really at my limit about it. Because I wouldn't have had to dox myself about it if they would quit trying to claim that I'm a groomer.

 

[Foxi4]

thats good to hear, i dont wanna tell you how to do your job but that kid has a habit of doing crazy things and embarressing themselves, might be worth making him retire.

If you know this for a fact then maybe you should be the bigger man and stop trolling him. I say trolling since you know this is how he’ll react to bait - you have prior knowledge of this, so I assume it’s intentional. Is that what you’re saying?

Thank you for the report, but yes, you’re right - you don’t want to start telling us how to do our jobs.

 

[lolcatzuru]

If you know this for a fact then maybe you should be the bigger man and stop trolling him. I say trolling since you know this is how he’ll react to bait - you have prior knowledge of this, so I assume it’s intentional, is that what you’re saying?

Thank you for the report, but yes, you’re right - you don’t want to start telling us how to do our jobs.

im not... trolling him? i am trying to genuinely tell him where his logic is flawed? unless you can point out somewhere that is true, but you know what ? id rather concede then deal with a big toughie like you

 

[Deleted member 586536]

I say trolling since you know this is how he’ll react to bait - you have prior knowledge of this, so I assume it’s intentional, is that what you’re saying?

Foxi4 is a groomer

(It's false, it's provably false, but apparently that's trolling)

Post automatically merged: Feb 25, 2023

(It's false, it's provably false, but apparently that's trolling)

 

[lolcatzuru]

Foxi4 is a groomer

(It's false, it's provably false, but apparently that's trolling)

Post automatically merged: Feb 25, 2023

(It's false, it's provably false, but apparently that's trolling)

the question is will he try to sue