-
Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions.
Tennessee poised to ban public drag shows, hormone therapy for children
- Thread starter x65943
- Start date
- Views 21,637
- Replies 501
- Likes 7
- Status
Literately my video I linked is that. The timestamp brings up a "post", which is on crowders website, showing how crowder lies about facts.
https://www.louderwithcrowder.com/climate-change-fail-melting-glacier-is-growing-again
You may want to use wayback machine.
"
"Study authors and outside scientists think this is temporary." You mean like the apparent shrinking starting around 2012 was temporary? Like that? You mean the oceans, the air, the glacier size, maybe that's not supposed to be constant either?
"
This is what crowder said (it's broken formatted since it actually took the formatting)
Crowder specifically focused on year, to two years within his article. To make an argument that the glacier was growing, and climate change was fake or it's over hysteria.
This is why that's wrong:
Crowder intentionally didn't mention that glaciers grow during the winter. Nor the total amount of loss. He went straight for
"See, see it's growing again"
This graph of that very glacier steven was talking about.
yep so that invalidates everything he ever said, got it. Let me know when the retirement part is, this has to stop
It does. If your someone of a "facts and knowlage" or cares about them. You wouldn't make a grave historical error like that. That's not something you would easily overlook or miss. And he does that kind of crap constantly.
Especially since all it would take is a ounce of research to find that. He never also correct himself over it either.
so then, you are wrong about everything as well, youve been wrong before, thus you are invalid, good to know.
Except I'm not presenting myself as a media person or with a channel who's "facts and logic" is the entire basis of the channel. I don't have an audience. I don't have that kind of responsibility on my shoulders. I don't have thousands of people watching videos that at least, should be well researched and edited.
Higher the responsibility ,the higher the standard. And even then I've admitted when I'm wrong.
yes you do, like with this topic, and you lie again, because you are wrong now, and dont want to acknolege that
Me: Brings up how crowder is wrong and frequently
You: show me how he was wrong you liar
Me: Proves how's he's wrong, and states that he's oftenly wrong
You: Well you must be wrong because you've been wrong before
Me: I don't have a channel or media following. I have a lower amount of responsibility. Which is why crowder's mistakes is far worse than mine. And even then I'm honest about when I'm wrong.
You: well your just going to lie like on this topic
You've come at me calling me a liar this whole time, and saying that I'm wrong, yet at every step, I've showed why I'm not. It would be impossible and unreasonable for me to show every single lie crowder has made.
Yet I showed how some of his lies, are so extreme, that you couldn't possible miss with the research he was supposedly doing in good faith. There is no way you would of missed shit from NASA, talking about the same ice sheet, while getting a source from another website, talking about the very same ice sheet.
thats the thing you arent, you never admitted you were wrong when you threatened to sue that guy.
i take no responsibility for this information and in no way condone the behavior of doxxing ones self.
Last edited by Foxi4,
Oh yes you fucking do
Post automatically merged:
"That's why you don't want to do it publicly"
So I'll go public. Since both you and traderpat constantly been throwing that out at me. And I'm frankly tired of it. So I'm putting the metal to the pedal.
that wasnt what i meant and you know that. You know what im going to say, which is why you posted that information, you wont admit what it is because it makes your argument bunk.
No I don't actually, so what are you going to say?
What is "it?"
And what is "what I won't admit"
that you are lying, its ok to admit it but lets talk about 2 things you are absolutely wrong about, which by your logic, invalidates everything you said.
1. you threatened a user with a lawsuit, without taking 30 seconds to look up the johnny depp case and then once you found out about it, you never officially admonished yourself for being wrong.
2. the second lie, and the one that makes this argument bunk is you know you are wrong about this but you obsess over woke shit for some reason is very simple, because even you would never condone of or approve of relationships with children because they arent capable of consent, so by that logic, they arent when it comes to life altering surgeries, you know this, which is why you brought up the pedo thing, and are lying about it now, no one cares about who you are or if you are a pedo or not, i care that you lie about things that are obviously lies. I tried to avoid having it come to this for your sake, but you opened the door, im walking through it.
I agree that for the children, merely seeing a man dressed as a comically oversexualized woman won't make that child gay (unless the kid is anyway, which is fine if that's the case). Even if the man dressed as a comically oversexualized woman is encouraging the child to touch his groin area, or flashing their crotch (in panties) at small children, it isn't going to turn that child gay, if they're not gay.
Yes, have seen video of that and similar happening at these 'drag shows.'
If the legislation is as vague and worthless as described above, I oppose it. Because it needs to be fixed to address the specific issue, in plain unambiguous language.
My question is ... what is this impulse to put men dressed as comically oversexualized women in front of small children? Why do you support doing this, why so these transgender "drag artists" want to do this so much????? Why is it so important to dress up literally "like a drag queen" and perform burlesque-type acts in front of small children? (if not to influence those children, or worse)
No it's not. You should be 18 before making major life changing decisions by yourself.
Post automatically merged:
Anyone exposing themselves to children should be shot on sight.
so how would you write the law then? because the things they dont mention are already illegal and it isnt stopping it from happening.
Johnny depp case is different since he's a well known actor. There's a different standard for defamation for public figures. Funny how you would critize someone for somehow being knowlagable on everything, and then talk about topics you don't know about.
you literally just proved my point for me, it is different because he's a well known actor, his career was ruined as a result. You have to be able to claim that that user whoever they were, caused you some kind of damages, which is literally impossible and you know that, its funny how someone claiming to be so knowledgeable keeps leaving out the details they know defeat their argument, you and crowder have more in common than you realize
- Status
- No one is chatting at the moment.
-
@
SylverReZ:
They probably said "Hey, why not we combine the two together and make a 'new' DS to sell". -
-
-
@
Veho:
Nothing special about it other than it's more comfortable than the Lite+1
for people with beefy hands. -
-
-
-
-
-
-
@
The Real Jdbye:
@SylverReZ if you could find a v5 DS ML you would have the best of both worlds since the v5 units had the same backlight brightness levels as the DS Lite unlockable with flashme -
-
-
@
BigOnYa:
A woman with no arms and no legs was sitting on a beach. A man comes along and the woman says, "I've never been hugged before." So the man feels bad and hugs her. She says "Well i've also never been kissed before." So he gives her a kiss on the cheek. She says "Well I've also never been fucked before." So the man picks her up, and throws her in the ocean and says "Now you're fucked."+2 -
-
-
@
BakerMan:
anyways, we need to re-normalize physical media+1
if i didn't want my games to be permanent, then i'd rent them -
@
BigOnYa:
Agreed, that why I try to buy all my games on disc, Xbox anyways. Switch games (which I pirate tbh) don't matter much, I stay offline 24/7 anyways.
-
-
@
cearp:
@BakerMan - you can still "own" digital media, arguably easier and better than physical since you can make copies and backups, as much as you like.
The issue is DRM -
@
cearp:
You can buy drm free games / music / ebooks, and if you keep backups of your data (like documents and family photos etc), then you shouldn't lose the game. but with a disk, your toddler could put it in the toaster and there goes your $60
-
-
@
rqkaiju2:
i like physical media because it actually feels like you own it. thats why i plan on burning music to cds -
-
. Saves on time, soap, water and money having to wash them.