It seems likely that they've developed their own CFW, but it's also possible they borrowed parts of Atmosphere.
In that case then if say they are using Michaels as it’s base then he should know if backup loading works on his cfw or is this a private development by TX. People who are buying the SXPro are only doing it for backup loading lets be honest.
Last edited by Reecey,
Their method of loading backups was developed by Team Xecuter.
Hmm, I’m thinking there must of been a bit of thanks very much from TX for Michaels cfw because they want it finished first and put together with the pro before it gets released to the public free! are you sure TX and Michael didn’t do a deal, one for the other I’m betting Michael will release a back up loader with his cfw when it’s time.
Last edited by Reecey,
He may say that I’m sure but where a lot of money is involved mate people will do just about anything don’t take that quote as concrete trust me! I’m not saying it won’t be released under someone else but I’m betting Michael has had the source first.
Last edited by Reecey,
There is nothing about Atmosphere's source that functions as a backup loader.
I'm not sure why I'm responding to this conspiracy nonsense.
Are you saying TX implements code within Michaels cfw for it to work? Suppose that’s a theory.
Also how can TX give a release date for the SXPro if the cfw hasn’t even been finished unless he is working with the team.
Last edited by Reecey,
TX build their own BackUp loader.
They probably used SciresM Atmosphere and a Kinda FuseeGeelee to launch, since Kate stated that several people find a way to exploit the BUG on the tegra.
But SciresM does not, or dont care to have a BackUp loader.
They COULD borrow some code from Atmosphere since it's open to public (anyone can use that code) and then build their own CFW alongside a backup loader. But the fact is that Atmosphere itself doesn't have and won't have (officially) a backup loader.
Last edited by lukhart,
Yes your right that’s what bothers me.
--------------------- MERGED ---------------------------
Yes I see now that’s the answer to the back up loader part but surely they will want the cfw finished and packed up ready to go to the end buyer before it gets released free to the general public so how does that work. Unless like the other guy said above thanks they can work on atmosphere without Michaels input.
Last edited by Reecey,
I’ve not bought any sx product, it just interests me the development side. We haven’t really been told much about the cfw side or even how the license activates the product from working, we haven’t even seen a video being posted of any xci files being put on an sd card activating the license, starting up the cfw and loading a back up, it’s all very vague to me! and it’s supposed to be released in say just over a weeks time. How do any of us even know the video is not just showing/loading games of an OFW side.
Last edited by Reecey,
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 5,256
- Trophies
- 2
- Age
- 38
- Location
- behind a parental advisory sticker
- XP
- 4,192
- Country
Yeah true. It’s just what bugs me, if I’m spending my £40.00 I want to see more hard facts, the reality of what I’m buying, if say it’s out the factory ready for resellers why not show us all more hard evidence of how it works I mean why not? that’s what I want to see.
Last edited by Reecey,
We don't know nothing.
We hypothesise that maybe they have based their cfw or part of their cfw on atmosphere, sience it is open source and that would reduce how much they have to do, they can however have taken a very early version of atmosphere and build a very different cfw on top of that, they don't need sciresM to do it, the source code is online, they can download it at any moment and build things on top of that, they can even have not used atmosphere at all or just used atmosphere as a reference for certain things, its still a mistery.
The only thing we are sure are that they have build their own backup loader, sience atmosphere doesn't have one as SciresM is anti-piracy
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
- Messages
- 5,256
- Trophies
- 2
- Age
- 38
- Location
- behind a parental advisory sticker
- XP
- 4,192
- Country
Similar threads
-
Psionic Roshambo
-
Xdqwerty
what are you looking at? -
realtimesave
-
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
@SylverReZ, in my experience, I wouldn't say I am an audiophile because to me MP3s seem fine, frequency cut off but good enough lol although in my laundry list of freak gifts... Is the ability to hear frequencies beyond what anyone else I have ever met... I max out hearing tests with shocked looks from the Drs, sad part is I can hear frequencies much higher.+1
-
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I am thankful florescent lights are mostly LED now... And TVs are far less annoying lol
-
-
-
-
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Psionic Roshambo, As somebody who has listened to music over everything, I prefer some good quality headphones that can output the sharpest audio. I listen to my music mostly with WAVE or FLAC files, with MP3s I can tell the difference straight away by the compression artifacts.+1 -
-
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
I mean I can tell the difference even with a high bitrate MP3 but I guess "it sounds good enough"
-
@
Psionic Roshambo:
Plus studio quality MP3's do exist, they are just like 512Kbps and are huge ass files lol
-
-
-
@
SylverReZ:
@Psionic Roshambo, MP3s were designed to be as small as possible, so that they can be shared on the internet. WAVE files were more bigger in size and would take hours to upload back in the day.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
