shaunj66 said:I think hybrid games (DS software that has DSi enhancements) should stay a part of the current DS release list (and numbering scheme) but we should implement a new info value for each release for "DSi Enhanced" software with a simple Yes/No answer. All the previous 3900 DS releases will automatically be set to "no" whereas the current and future hybrid titles should say Yes.
Software that is DSi ONLY should have a new numbering/release list.
2nded.lilsypha said:shaunj66 said:I think hybrid games (DS software that has DSi enhancements) should stay a part of the current DS release list (and numbering scheme) but we should implement a new info value for each release for "DSi Enhanced" software with a simple Yes/No answer. All the previous 3900 DS releases will automatically be set to "no" whereas the current and future hybrid titles should say Yes.
Software that is DSi ONLY should have a new numbering/release list.
This. I was just about to type this.
This seems to be the best option.science said:DS, with info stating that it has DSi functions
agreed. So many noobs overthrowing the votes. I really don't see the reasoning of keeping them in a DSi only category. That can confuse readers into thinking those games only work for DSi. Dsiware and DSi only games should be the ones in the DSi category.Salamantis said:This seems to be the best option.science said:DS, with info stating that it has DSi functions
There's also the possibility that people who roll in, vote, and leave are putting less thought into their decision than those who you know, read the topic and consider their position. Either way, the general consensus achieved in this topic will hopefully take precedence over the numbers sitting above it.shaunj66 said:Hmm, almost everyone that has made a comment has suggested similar to what I proposed, yet the poll results are in favour of separating them into their own list. Are some people perhaps not reading the poll question properly, and assuming it's DSi-exclusive titles we're talking about?