Ever considered the opposite? If all the witnesses, evidence and convictions DO point out to a narrative where Trump has done illegal acts, then the white house is compromised as well as a large part of the republican party. How do you think that'll hold up in terms of faith in their political parties?
If false allegations are a crime, who is really the culprit? The whole investigation could've happened well under the radar and away from the press, but where Mueller made barely any public statement, Trump twittered about it on a daily basis.
Oh, and...the allegations are stated on solid grounds. It would be a different thing if there was no evidence, but there are already quite some convictions. It's about a year too late to still call it a witch hunt.
And...I don't think you understand how evidence works. As investigators, it's THEIR task to search and come up with evidence of what they are investigating (which, again, is aimed at the people AROUND Trump. I know fox news makes it seem as if Mueller was doing bad at doing something else, but he has some very good results in his task at hand). Saying "there is evidence that he is innocent" is ridiculous. You can hardly prove something that didn't happen.
Trump being victorious is to be expected. That's just how he is: downplaying losses to give the impression of winning to his fan base. The North Korean summits were so successful that Kim Jong-Un left suddenly. The Mexican wall was so successful that the government shutdown was ended AND a shutdown was stuck in limbo. And those are just the most glaring examples. So please...don't pretend that the white house is somehow an objective source in this matter.
