Hacking Hardware Picofly - a HWFLY switch modchip

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathew77
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 3,671,643
  • Replies Replies 17,052
  • Likes Likes 15
Hi.
RP2040 good work on 3.3v
And perfectly work via emmc & MicroSD card.
Post automatically merged:

Im find firmware for rp2040, but dont know fow to dump it(
I have rp2040 with firmware and need dump it
Yes, of course the guy with the stockphoto profile pic who joined TODAY
has the only working ... whatever it is supposed to be
totally legit
not a troll
 
Well, give me the sha256 of it and I can ask someone to verify it :P

Lookin at my Gucci, it’s about that time!

.
.
.
.
1673732992662.jpeg

.
.
.

Sooooooo….uhhh….read any good books lately?
 
lol, find this photo...
im really, picofly its work
Can find it on a few Russian websites.

Also, no to the thing you said. You're clearly a troll and no good will come from this.
Post automatically merged:

can you post the file (i can upload it to my server just send me a email with the firmware file to [email protected])
You're 13 years old. Stop falling for internet trolls and ffs stop using your real name and posting your private email address
 
Can find it on a few Russian websites.

Also, no to the thing you said. You're clearly a troll and no good will come from this.
Post automatically merged:


You're 13 years old. Stop falling for internet trolls and ffs stop using your real name and posting your private email address
Ahhhh hells no! I swear he said he was 18!
 
Well the rumour at the moment is that the author has sold the code to a company in china and funnily enough the China factories are ramping up production of the actual 2040 ic.
If this is true its possible we can still make our own. We will see
 
Well the rumour at the moment is that the author has sold the code to a company in china and funnily enough the China factories are ramping up production of the actual 2040 ic.
If this is true its possible we can still make our own. We will see
This is a total departure from the initial “mission statement” of “screw HWFLY and their price gouging”.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: peteruk
I have a theory about this.

My theory is that the "picofly" was never a full jailbreak in itself - it could only perform the voltage glitch after the timing parameters are found with "training" from the hwfly.

The benefit to end users in that case would be very little. Instead it would be modders reaping the benefits who would no longer have to buy an hwfly to install in every system. They could use the same hwfly to find the timing parameters, and then swap in the $2 chip and send it out the door.

If this is indeed true then it makes perfect sense why this is being held back. It would create a lot of confusion between modders and buyers about pricing and potentially there would be a backlash against them. Also if the timing parameters ever changed then it would be impossible to "re-train" without hwfly and warranty would be a giant headache for modders.

Again it's just a theory and I don't have any way to substantiate this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peteruk
Even if ninty said no their would be nothing stopping them selling the code on. But hey what do I know lol...

It would be nice if a new chip does show as it will stir the market up and get the prices down to a sensible level and as said before if its using the 2040 it can can ripped easily and im sure somebody else in the scene with balls will do something with it.
 
when it detects the custom BCT / bootloader isn't installed
Actually I don't think it does this at all, although it SHOULD (if possible). Thus, people black-screen after updating firmware in OFW (which overwrites boot0/1, overwriting the chip's payload). It doesn't try to detect it, if it has already been trained. One has to reset the chip and retrain for their switch to work again, in this case.
 
Maybe the original news about the new $3 modchip was just misunderstood?
Maybe it meant that the new modchip would cost $3 more than the HWFLY? Or vice versa, $3 cheaper... :unsure:
 
Actually I don't think it does this at all, although it SHOULD (if possible). Thus, people black-screen after updating firmware in OFW (which overwrites boot0/1, overwriting the chip's payload). It doesn't try to detect it, if it has already been trained. One has to reset the chip and retrain for their switch to work again, in this case.
I've only updated (sysNAND) OFW a handful of times with the chip install but I've never had that happen to me. It always reflashes the bootloader and then retrains. That's with both an official SX Core and a HWFly chip.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum