Hacking Pandora DS Flash Card

[Deleted User]

A CARD FOR RETARDED 5 YEAR OLDS

 

[epicCreations.or]

Wait a second, what what WHAT?! 64GB SDHC?! Wouldn't that be SDXC, considering SDHC only goes up to 32GB?!

 

[Pippin666]

This website is nothing more than a joke. The website makes it clean that it's made in japan just about a day after a bill is passed Japan, banning completly fabrication, import and export of fashcarts.

Initial source : DS-Scene
Source : Yahoo

I am already getting "Service Unavailable" from time to time.

Pip'

 

[chyyran]

When you open Pandora's Box, bad things come out of it. So when you use a Pandora flash cart, bad things happen.
When you go to the Pandora-DS website, bad things happen. This flashcart is incredibly accurate!

 

[Dr.Aqua]

Lol
the menu seems kinda nice though
like the iMENU

 

[nl255]

can it use the 64gb as they say ?

There's no such thing as a 64GB SDHC. SDHC only goes up to 32GB.
If it is true that it's a R4iDSN clone, then it doesn't support SDXC, meaning that they're lying.

Wrong. To get a 64GB SDHC card all you have to do is take a 64GB SDXC card and reformat it with the FAT32 filesystem. The ONLY difference between SDHC and SDXC is that SDXC uses the exFAT filesystem (by default) which, like NTFS, is only available to Microsoft and whoever they let use it. (yes, there is a FUSE driver based on reverse engineering but it doesn't work very well (even worse than NTFS-3G))

 

[Rydian]

(even worse than NTFS-3G)

NTFS-3G's been considered stable for a few years. It's included in multiple major distros.

 

[nl255]

(even worse than NTFS-3G)

NTFS-3G's been considered stable for a few years. It's included in multiple major distros.

In Linux (and MacOS, I assume), but not for anything else like the Wii. As for the exFAT driver, it is still in the early stages and is nowhere near stable enough to be used by flash cart makers. So the point stands, we will not see SDXC (SDXC with exFAT) support in flash carts for a long time but I bet many of them already support 64GB SDHC cards (SDXC with FAT32).

 

[nutella]

can it use the 64gb as they say ?

There's no such thing as a 64GB SDHC. SDHC only goes up to 32GB.
If it is true that it's a R4iDSN clone, then it doesn't support SDXC, meaning that they're lying.

Wrong. To get a 64GB SDHC card all you have to do is take a 64GB SDXC card and reformat it with the FAT32 filesystem. The ONLY difference between SDHC and SDXC is that SDXC uses the exFAT filesystem (by default) which, like NTFS, is only available to Microsoft and whoever they let use it. (yes, there is a FUSE driver based on reverse engineering but it doesn't work very well (even worse than NTFS-3G))

This was a similar case for the SD specification, was it not?

 

[ProtoKun7]

You guys know the banner on their website? These people are so pathetic they spelled "Storage" right.
They spelled it Stoage. xDD

Do you mean they didn't spell it right?

 

[nl255]

can it use the 64gb as they say ?

There's no such thing as a 64GB SDHC. SDHC only goes up to 32GB.
If it is true that it's a R4iDSN clone, then it doesn't support SDXC, meaning that they're lying.

Wrong. To get a 64GB SDHC card all you have to do is take a 64GB SDXC card and reformat it with the FAT32 filesystem. The ONLY difference between SDHC and SDXC is that SDXC uses the exFAT filesystem (by default) which, like NTFS, is only available to Microsoft and whoever they let use it. (yes, there is a FUSE driver based on reverse engineering but it doesn't work very well (even worse than NTFS-3G))

This was a similar case for the SD specification, was it not?

No, SDHC cards are physically incompatible with normal SD cards. That is not the case with SDXC, in fact the only issue is that Windows won't let you format anything above 32GB as FAT32 because Microsoft wants you to use NTFS or exFAT which they control.

 

[Sausage Head]

website's full of shit

"r4 and other flashcards: not the supportsoft reset PANDORA-Ds: support soft reset
not compitable with latest game 100% compitable latest game"

also, stealing homebrew people worked hard on and renaming them to crap names is just awful
oh and learn some proper engrish

 

[nutella]

No, SDHC cards are physically incompatible with normal SD cards. That is not the case with SDXC, in fact the only issue is that Windows won't let you format anything above 32GB as FAT32 because Microsoft wants you to use NTFS or exFAT which they control.

Oh right, different architecture. Gotcha.

 

[caster62003]

Hmm, link I'm going to have to go with R4 clone, which has clearly already been established numerous of other times in this thread

I'm quite interested to see the UI, only thing I can't find on the site. But why are you going to test it on the kid's DS? Especially when they didn't even open it yet, I think everybody here can wait until the 25th or so, this way your kids won't think they got a pre-used toy, I'd be very angry at my parents if they decided to "test" my new toy before I even got to lay my hands on the packaging.

Because the kids are 6 years old, and theres nothing worse than waiting for a battery to charge, or finding out theres an issue. Plus I had to make sure the cards worked properly and were already loaded. If the kid was 14, I'd agree with you, its a different story with youngsters. They want to open and play, not open and wait for charging

or to find out theres an issue with the flash card.

Little late to the reply, but ok, now I understand why you would do such a thing. I remember when I was that age, I was such an impatient brat, go forth and charge

 

[chyyran]

I just looked at the website, the first time, I got an Invalid Hostname
Second time, I see a bunch of chingrish, I look at the homebrew section and I was like, Is that Beup and Bunjalloo? Man, why did they even bother to rename the homebrew? Besides, Beup is dead anyways, it doesn't work anymore AFAIK

 

[.Chris]

ALERT! Do not go on the home page, it WILL give you a Trojan Virus!

As Stevetry said:

steves does not lie i did get something

I too, got the virus, and a few of them too:

Spoiler

Ignore everything else that is not a "Trojan.Agent.Gen"

 

[Rydian]

First, it's not actually an infection, I covered that earlier, it's a false positive.

Second, what's in your second screenshot is unrelated to what's on this site.

 

[Hotness1]

site give me a trojan

Gave me one too

 

[.Chris]

First, it's not actually an infection, I covered that earlier, it's a false positive.

Second, what's in your second screenshot is unrelated to what's on this site.

I do know that, I'm just show a list of Trojans that I got by visiting that site a few times.

EDIT: False positive?

 

[Rydian]

EDIT: False positive?http://antivirus.about.com/od/antivirusglo...lsepositive.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antivirus_sof...false_positives

Check what I posted about that file earlier. That file AVG is warning you about.

Second, what's in your second screenshot is unrelated to what's on this site.

I do know that, I'm just show a list of Trojans that I got by visiting that site a few times.

QUOTE(Rydian @ Dec 23 2010, 01:16 AM)

Second, what's in your second screenshot is unrelated to what's on this site.

That warning from the site is a false positive, it's not an actual infection. What you're showing in the second screenshot is unrelated to the first.