D
YayMii said:There's no such thing as a 64GB SDHC. SDHC only goes up to 32GB.Stevetry said:can it use the 64gb as they say ?
If it is true that it's a R4iDSN clone, then it doesn't support SDXC, meaning that they're lying.
NTFS-3G's been considered stable for a few years. It's included in multiple major distros.nl255 said:(even worse than NTFS-3G)
Rydian said:NTFS-3G's been considered stable for a few years. It's included in multiple major distros.nl255 said:(even worse than NTFS-3G)
This was a similar case for the SD specification, was it not?nl255 said:YayMii said:There's no such thing as a 64GB SDHC. SDHC only goes up to 32GB.Stevetry said:can it use the 64gb as they say ?
If it is true that it's a R4iDSN clone, then it doesn't support SDXC, meaning that they're lying.
Wrong. To get a 64GB SDHC card all you have to do is take a 64GB SDXC card and reformat it with the FAT32 filesystem. The ONLY difference between SDHC and SDXC is that SDXC uses the exFAT filesystem (by default) which, like NTFS, is only available to Microsoft and whoever they let use it. (yes, there is a FUSE driver based on reverse engineering but it doesn't work very well (even worse than NTFS-3G))
Do you mean they didn't spell it right?AndroidDem0man said:You guys know the banner on their website? These people are so pathetic they spelled "Storage" right.
They spelled it Stoage. xDD
nutella said:This was a similar case for the SD specification, was it not?nl255 said:YayMii said:There's no such thing as a 64GB SDHC. SDHC only goes up to 32GB.Stevetry said:can it use the 64gb as they say ?
If it is true that it's a R4iDSN clone, then it doesn't support SDXC, meaning that they're lying.
Wrong. To get a 64GB SDHC card all you have to do is take a 64GB SDXC card and reformat it with the FAT32 filesystem. The ONLY difference between SDHC and SDXC is that SDXC uses the exFAT filesystem (by default) which, like NTFS, is only available to Microsoft and whoever they let use it. (yes, there is a FUSE driver based on reverse engineering but it doesn't work very well (even worse than NTFS-3G))
Oh right, different architecture. Gotcha.nl255 said:No, SDHC cards are physically incompatible with normal SD cards. That is not the case with SDXC, in fact the only issue is that Windows won't let you format anything above 32GB as FAT32 because Microsoft wants you to use NTFS or exFAT which they control.
Niles said:caster62003 said:Hmm, link I'm going to have to go with R4 clone, which has clearly already been established numerous of other times in this thread
I'm quite interested to see the UI, only thing I can't find on the site. But why are you going to test it on the kid's DS? Especially when they didn't even open it yet, I think everybody here can wait until the 25th or so, this way your kids won't think they got a pre-used toy, I'd be very angry at my parents if they decided to "test" my new toy before I even got to lay my hands on the packaging.
Because the kids are 6 years old, and theres nothing worse than waiting for a battery to charge, or finding out theres an issue. Plus I had to make sure the cards worked properly and were already loaded. If the kid was 14, I'd agree with you, its a different story with youngsters. They want to open and play, not open and wait for chargingor to find out theres an issue with the flash card.
Stevetry said:
steves does not lie i did get something
I do know that, I'm just show a list of Trojans that I got by visiting that site a few times.Rydian said:First, it's not actually an infection, I covered that earlier, it's a false positive.
Second, what's in your second screenshot is unrelated to what's on this site.
That warning from the site is a false positive, it's not an actual infection. What you're showing in the second screenshot is unrelated to the first.RoboticBuddy said:EDIT: False positive?http://antivirus.about.com/od/antivirusglo...lsepositive.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antivirus_sof...false_positives
Check what I posted about that file earlier. That file AVG is warning you about.
Second, what's in your second screenshot is unrelated to what's on this site.Rydian said:Second, what's in your second screenshot is unrelated to what's on this site.QUOTE(Rydian @ Dec 23 2010, 01:16 AM)RoboticBuddy said:I do know that, I'm just show a list of Trojans that I got by visiting that site a few times.