NY Looks To Pass Anti-Anonymous Bill

Discussion in 'User Submitted News' started by Rydian, May 28, 2012.

  1. Rydian
    OP

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,108
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters

    NY Bill S6779-2011 seems to have good intentions to protect against cyber-bullying, but probably goes way too far.


    [​IMG] Bill

    Pft, Costello just wants to come visit me and play pirated smash bros. ^_^
     
    6 people like this.


  2. DSGamer64

    DSGamer64 Canadian, Eh?

    Member
    2,932
    171
    Nov 9, 2007
    Canada
    A cold cold place
    Doesn't make sense. Shouldn't anonymous posts still have an IP address tagged to them? Also, how many websites allow anonymous posting these days with all the spam bots running rampant around the net.
     
  3. air2004

    air2004 Air

    Member
    1,612
    439
    Oct 24, 2008
    United States
    Anytown
    This is how it starts.
     
  4. Rydian
    OP

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,108
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    With just an IP they have to go get the info from the ISP and then hope it wasn't a proxy and all that jass.

    What we call "forum names" they call "anonymous".
     
  5. Thesolcity

    Thesolcity Wherever the light shines, it casts a shadow.

    Member
    2,159
    597
    Oct 2, 2010
    United States
    San Miguel
    I hate these cyber-bullying measures, they're absolute bullshit. Those commercials can piss off too.
     
    2 people like this.
  6. TwinRetro

    TwinRetro Don't start nothin', Won't be nothin'

    Global Moderator
    6,181
    4,804
    Aug 29, 2008
    United States
    Las Vegas, NV
    David Smith from 2376 N. Appaloosa Ln., Texas says: FAK U MTHR FKER I KILL YOU
     
    12 people like this.
  7. The Milkman

    The Milkman GBATemp's Official Asshat Milkman

    Member
    3,471
    1,113
    Jan 12, 2011
    United States
    Throwing milk at the bitches!
    I just don't understand the concept of cyber bullying overall. I mean, if some retard over the internet clearly has nothing to do other then follow you around a forum and criticize your posts or troll you, why do you give a fuck about what they say?
     
    1 person likes this.
  8. triassic911

    triassic911 Burst Mode

    Member
    2,743
    344
    May 9, 2007
    United States
    NYC, USA
    Would be cool if all our usernames changed to 'Anon'. I think we end up talking to each other very differently.
     
    2 people like this.
  9. Sicklyboy

    Sicklyboy Resident Mechanical Keyboard Addict

    Global Moderator
    5,714
    4,676
    Jul 15, 2009
    United States
    [̲̅$̲̅(̲̅ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°̲̅)̲̅$̲̅]
    They're really defining a forum username as anonymous? I'll admit I haven't looked at the bill, but based on the few excerpts and reports I had read about it, I had taken it to be mainly directed at places such as news websites that previously allowed anyone to comment, even without a username.
     
  10. Frank Cadena

    Frank Cadena GBAtemp Fan

    Member
    317
    46
    Sep 13, 2009
    Wow, cyber-bullyiing is really such a big issue? Enough to strip a person's right to privacy and safety? Because I just ignore bullies on the internet unless they're right in my face in person. Even then I could just run away. I'm pretty fast.
     
  11. Hyro-Sama

    Hyro-Sama I'm from the fucking future.

    Member
    4,259
    3,015
    Oct 25, 2009
    After Earth
    Cyber-Bullying is bullshit. Just quit Facebook or whatever social networking your using to stop being bullied online. Done.
     
    7 people like this.
  12. Rydian
    OP

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,108
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    They consider a forum anonymous as far as an actual name and home address and such is considered. I quoted part of the bill's own self-presented summary.
     
  13. FireGrey

    FireGrey Undercover Admin

    Member
    3,920
    909
    Apr 13, 2010
    Cause getting stabbed during your sleep is better than being called a fanboy.
     
  14. Haloman800

    Haloman800 a real gril

    Member
    1,727
    514
    Dec 18, 2009
    United States
    Consequences will never be the same.

    On a more serious note, New York is going to ban posting anonymously, yet they legalized viewing child porn?

    So, according to New York law, keeping your identity a secret is wrong but viewing naked underaged children in lewd acts is not?
     
  15. Rydian
    OP

    Rydian Resident Furvert™

    Member
    27,883
    8,108
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    Link?
     
  16. Thesolcity

    Thesolcity Wherever the light shines, it casts a shadow.

    Member
    2,159
    597
    Oct 2, 2010
    United States
    San Miguel
    Yes, link please. Considering cp has a federal ban, states should not be able to override it. Unless you're talking about lolicon..
     
  17. Zerosuit connor

    Zerosuit connor Baby I'm Back ♥

    Member
    1,847
    304
    Sep 17, 2010
    Eorzea
    I've never been cyber bullied and most idiots that do it don't know what a proxy is. They don't need to take it this far, also Zerosuit Connor = Not so anonymous.
     
  18. Haloman800

    Haloman800 a real gril

    Member
    1,727
    514
    Dec 18, 2009
    United States
    http://voices.yahoo....y-11331426.html

    According to the law, since you're not technically "owning" the Child Porn simply by viewing it online, by their law it's not a crime.

    How could anybody approve this? This is sick and disgusting. If states are going to try and use loopholes like this, there should be a national law where viewing child porn at all is illegal.
     
  19. The Milkman

    The Milkman GBATemp's Official Asshat Milkman

    Member
    3,471
    1,113
    Jan 12, 2011
    United States
    Throwing milk at the bitches!
    I agree! Not because of the moral aspect, but because most underaged girls don't have much tit to look at to begin with (Chill bro, I'm 15.) Besides, I'm pretty sure its mentally damaging to those children to have to do those acts in the first place, on top of that I wouldn't be surprised if in most cases its raep anyway, either way its breaking a law. Great country we have here, a few idiots do stupid shit because of people on the internet, people in communities like us get to have a right violated, but in that same breath, its alright to look at little girls/boys in lewd acts as long as you don't dare press "Save Image". Its like western civilization just wants to collapse.
     
  20. Fat D

    Fat D GBAtemp Maniac

    Member
    1,124
    53
    Nov 18, 2006
    Gambia, The
    "Disgusting" is not really a good motivator for legislation. The children are physically hurt during the production, and the production only. If a video has been produced, it no longer matters how many people watch it. Therefore, I fail to understand why having those videos should be a crime in itself, rather than just evidence of one.
    For that matter, where is the crime against a human in purely synthetic stuff, such as drawings? As long as no real child stood model for the act, no real child has been harmed. What is the crime? Is it because it is "icky"? Then do not watch it. That is what I do - I do not find stuff like this attractive, so I do not consume it. Now, can we focus our efforts on preventing actual humans from getting hurt instead of criminalizing those who never hurt one themselves?
     
    1 person likes this.