Michael Jackson - "Michael" (2010)

Raiser

I am mad scientist.
OP
Member
Joined
May 31, 2008
Messages
1,563
Trophies
1
Website
Visit site
XP
671
Country
Canada
Hey guys,

While showing my dad one of the songs from the much-anticipated "Michael" album by the king of pop, he mentioned something to me that was on Entertainment Tonight- referring to the album; that some of the songs may not have been done by Michael, but rather by someone else with a similar voice... "fraud" they call it.

I haven't heard most of the songs yet, but has anyone else heard about this?
If so, what're your takes on the accusation?

RIP King of Pop
 

KingdomBlade

Blade v3+ (I R SHMEXY)
Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Messages
2,941
Trophies
1
Age
28
Location
In Vulpes' Fur
Website
meekpicture.blogspot.com
XP
648
Country
Let us say that there are 10 songs, and 6 were sang by Michael, while 4 were sang by an impostor. I wouldn't really care. The songs were probably written by Michael or with Michael's consent, as with all of his songs. If someone else performs them, it would still contain the amazing touch of Michael. I heard the song "Hold My Hand" and it felt genuinely... MJ-like. It was completely amazing.

RIP MJ
 

ShadowSoldier

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
9,382
Trophies
0
XP
3,889
Country
Canada
If Michael gave the O.K., then I see no problem with it. Give the fans what they want, and by that I mean all the songs he wrote. Not just 6 of them or whatever. Sure the rest might be an impostor, but hey, if the music was actually from Michael, I'm glad we're able to hear the rest of his work.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
  • Skelletonike @ Skelletonike:
    I just googled and drag and drop seemed to be possible at the time
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    idk, but in high school at least, I used my ipod as a portable HDD to store World of Warcraft game files on and play it on the school PCs when I was done with my work each class :lol:
  • Plazorn @ Plazorn:
    I finally got a proper torrenting vpn!
  • Plazorn @ Plazorn:
    I'll have my own little collection in no-time

    B-)
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Nice. What VPN? PIA?
  • Plazorn @ Plazorn:
    It's called AirVPN, it was highly recomended by fmhy
  • Plazorn @ Plazorn:
    It supports port forwarding as well!
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Nice. I use privado VPN, got it for free with one of my usenet providers. It sucks, doesn't support port forwarding so I have issues connecting to a lot of peers. But still prefer it over not using one
    +1
  • Plazorn @ Plazorn:
    I guess it's better than nothing. What's the advantage of Usenet?
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    @Plazorn, upsides to usenet - SSL encrypted so no vpn needed, it downloads from the usenet provider's servers and is not peer-to-peer, generally can download as fast as your internet/router/storage can possibly allow, usenet providers in different countries have different takedown policies a la DMCA, and if you have multiple providers you might be able to grab bits and pieces of a file from multiple providers in order to still get stuff that was removed from one (they generally don't remove all parts of the file, just enough to make it non-functional)
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Downsides is it does cost money, having multiple providers is useful as mentioned above but then you're paying more money, and you need NZB indexers (the usenet parallel to a torrent tracker) and the good ones also usually cost a small amount of money.
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Oh yeah, also since it's not P2P there's no ratio to maintain or anything. If you wanna download 5TB a day or whatever, knock yourself out
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    I generally prefer usenet over torrents, but I do like having torrents as a fallback option
  • Plazorn @ Plazorn:
    That's really interesting @Sicklyboy , I was always under the impression that usenet was slower than regular internet. Also the fact that you don't need any vpn for it to be secure.
  • Plazorn @ Plazorn:
    It seems like it would be less stressful, because you wouldn't have to worry about piracy trolls as much
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Yeah, like at the end of the day, with the few usenet providers and NZB indexers I'm paying for, I'm probably paying anually what a netflix sub would cost. But netflix doesn't have everything media related I want, let alone other stuff like games and software :D
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    But it's largely set it and forget it
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    On black friday and a bunch of other holidays you can usually find providers doing like $35/year sales on reddit. And the indexers are usually like $15-20 for a year and a half on sale
  • Plazorn @ Plazorn:
    You pay for the convenience at the end of the day
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    I have I think 3 providers I'm currently paying for and 2 indexers. So probably around $110 a year if I had to guess in order to keep that setup going
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    But you certainly don't need to go that deep into it, you can do very well with a single provider and single indexer
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Yeah the convenience factor is unbeatable imo. Worth it to me
  • Plazorn @ Plazorn:
    thanks @Sicklyboy, Usenet makes more sense to me now.
    +1
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    Gladly! Check out /r/usenet if you're ever looking for a little bit of a deeper look into how it all works
  • Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy:
    (or hit me up lol)
    +1
    Sicklyboy @ Sicklyboy: (or hit me up lol) +1