Rydian said:
One man is not the scene, and the people that make these things are often not the people who make the guides.
It's proper educate to at least comment the source code. Not just for the people who may use it, but for the original author as well. Not commenting the source is a sign of egotism. After programming in c and cpp and reading twenty or so books on it, it's generally agree upon to comment the source. The original author may be able to figure out what they did, but not always. It isn't a matter of skill either. I write tight compact reusable code in the style of object oriented and I say from experience that commenting the code has saved me five to thirty minutes of searching. The only non-code in math's leak is the output strings. A lot of those are vague as well.
That said, math did try to document what he did later in a tweet. It was horrible. It was easier to follow the source code than the garbage he spewed out. I read his 'guide' and then read the main sub. It took a little following, but what he said he did and what the program did were barely compatible. It's obvious that his tweet was an attempt to dissuade people from attempting to use the source. It was like in star trek where they use a complex explanation for something simple.