- Joined
- May 27, 2010
- Messages
- 327
- Trophies
- 0
- Age
- 34
- Location
- Pomona, CA
- Website
- Visit site
- XP
- 69
- Country
@Old8oy
You say that “the [J]udge didn't "grant"ony access to this stuff.” I say he did.
It really comes down to who had the power to grant Sony what it wanted.
Geohot or the Judge?
If Geohot allowed (agreed with) Sony to search some dude’s house, is Sony allowed to do it?
No, the Judge had to first decide whether or not that action was relevant to the case. The Judge couldn’t just grant Sony the liberty to do it just because Geohot had agreed.
@ Maedhros
I guess I should have used stubborn. I inferred ignorant from stubbornness, which isn't far of what you meant. Please clarify what you meant, I would like to know how you interpret your own sentences.
*
Just below the response to you, I quoted Old8oy’s argument, and you still missed the actual point.
Edit: too many typos to let go.
You say that “the [J]udge didn't "grant"
It really comes down to who had the power to grant Sony what it wanted.
Geohot or the Judge?
If Geohot allowed (agreed with) Sony to search some dude’s house, is Sony allowed to do it?
No, the Judge had to first decide whether or not that action was relevant to the case. The Judge couldn’t just grant Sony the liberty to do it just because Geohot had agreed.
@ Maedhros
Maedhros said:Seriously, just stop trying. People here and on the scene sites will not understand this even if it was told by god.
I guess I should have used stubborn. I inferred ignorant from stubbornness, which isn't far of what you meant. Please clarify what you meant, I would like to know how you interpret your own sentences.
*
Just below the response to you, I quoted Old8oy’s argument, and you still missed the actual point.
Edit: too many typos to let go.