Nus Packer does not work on RedNAND
You failed somewhere, redNAND have sigpatches and don't even check if the .tmd/.tik is right...
So the .h3/.app are fucked up, the file you provided while packing are fucked too then
Nus Packer does not work on RedNAND
Right, as why i said it's 100% safe.Thats true, But if you manage to install some dodgy file to sysNAND & manage to corrupt your storage or actual nand, That it... Its done. If you do the same to redNAND, It bricks redNAND, Format SD & start again. Thats the reason most people use it (Well thats why I use it anyway)
This. Priiloader/Bootmii alldeyThe best would be sysnand with coldboot recovery like we had on wii
read full point, was refering to the fact any changes you make incorrectly will result in brick on sysNAND but not redNANDThis applies to RedNAND too
I dont know what happens then. I get error code 0xFFFBF442. Verify title.tik and WUP files ar correct & complete.You failed somewhere, redNAND have sigpatches and don't even check if the .tmd/.tik is right...
So the .h3/.app are fucked up, the file you provided while packing are fucked too then
He tested like 3 different games and dumps.You failed somewhere, redNAND have sigpatches and don't even check if the .tmd/.tik is right...
So the .h3/.app are fucked up, the file you provided while packing are fucked too then
From my latest findings:I dont know what happens then. I get error code 0xFFFBF442. Verify title.tik and WUP files ar correct & complete.
- Can never be updated That's not 100% known whatsover, okay?
- System will be limited to the speeds of your sd card so a slow sd will dramatically effect load times So? Who uses slow SD's anyway, especially at 64GB or higher.
- Dumping your system can take between 1-9 hours depending on your NAND/SD setup It's a one time thing, really impatient people.
*bricks*Nobody really needs brick protection
As you stated@KevinX8, hey, add "sysNAND will never support coldboothax to iosuhax sysNAND." to the sysNAND cons.
That's not 100% known whatsover, okay?
um where did you get this info from? this thosent even make sense considering the way rednand and iosu cfw are launched are in the exact same way@KevinX8, hey, add "sysNAND will never support coldboothax to iosuhax sysNAND." to the sysNAND cons.
As you stated
I'm pretty sure a coldboot hack will be possible in sysnand is the future
The current coldboothax requires replacing sysNAND's default title, therefore when you load iosuhax for sysNANd it'll automatically load homebrew in a bootloop.um where did you get this info from? this thosent even make sense considering the way rednand and iosu cfw are launched are in the exact same way
If you need brick protection use your rednand.*bricks*
oh yeah lol I saw someone do youtube vid of that and it happened to him, like I said coldboot hax is no good until we get boot0 cfwThe current coldboothax requires replacing sysNAND's default title, therefore when you load iosuhax for sysNANd it'll automatically load homebrew in a bootloop.
Why do you put lines after you type.If you need brick protection use your rednand.
Not many need brick protection
And, uh no? It's perfectly fine and works with redNAND, just doesn't work with sysNAND?oh yeah lol I saw someone do youtube vid of that and it happened to him, like I said coldboot hax is no good until we get boot0 cfw
Thats the magic word.The current coldboothax
IT'S shit; what are you talking about, are you actually retarted? It's a good solution.Thats the magic word.
The current coldboothax is shit.
Once Salt Releases a proper cfw you won't be able to update to it because they stated it might not work with the current rednand. Not only that but you can't boot sysnand and edit system.xml
It is until a better solution comes out. You know once coldboothax is installed you can't uninstall it. So when a better hax comes out your wii u will be booting into a not as good back.IT'S shit; what are you talking about, are you actually retarted? It's a good solution.