I'm sure there was a way to mount PKG and ISO files on IRISMAN on its file manager but now I can't find it. Where is it?
Last edited by Windows_10_User,
iirc you have to press triangle once in the file manager, it'll show a menu with an option to mount it (at least for pkg). ISOs should be detected automatically if put in the right folder (PS3ISO for PS3 games, PS2ISO for PS2, ...)
Iso is good fro NTFS drives. Make sure its MBR and not GPT.That's what I recall but nothing shows up when I do that. Weird.
It doesn't detect PS2 games on FAT32's/NTFS's external HDD's PS2ISO folder, only in the PS3's PS2ISO folder.
It doesn't detect as well PS2 games in the CUE/BIN formats in the PS3's PS2ISO folder and also in FAT32's/NTFS's external HDD's PS2ISO folder, only in PS3's PSXISO folder and in FAT32's/NTFS's external HDD's PSXISO folder. I thought only PS1 games went to the PSXISO folder but it looks like PS2 games that are in the CUE/BIN format do too.
EDIT: Now the "Mount + Exit to XMB" setting shows up and I'm able to mount PKG files on NTFS partitions but it doesn't work for PS2 games but to be honest I don't recall if it ever did.
PS2 games can't be played on external drives, you can at best copy them to the PS3 hdd (webman does that if you try to play a ps2 game from external drive) but that's all. Glad that it at least works for pkg
Iso is good fro NTFS drives. Make sure its MBR and not GPT.
You can convert ps2 bins to iso many ways. I use OPL on PC to convert.
USB should look like internal does:What do you think I should do, copy PS2 games to an external HDD and then use FileZilla's File Manager to copy them to the PS3 or just FTP them the PS3? The former might be faster but the second has two processes so I don't know which one is faster overall.
I put PS3 ISOs on my external HDD's NTFS partition and I already download PS2 ISOs, so no need to convert them.
USB should look like internal does:
PSXISO
PS2ISO
PS3ISO
PS2 games get copied over to internal when launching for the firt time from usb - You can ftp from computer or do it through the PS3 when loading the PS2 game.
Both USB ports are USB 2.0 as per wikipedia so it shouldn't change anything to play the drive in either port, I've only seen a limitation like this on the Wii.But they don't even show up on my IRISMAN while on the external HDD so how can I launch them? You're telling me IRISMAN prompts me to copy them to the PS3? But each way is faster, copy them to the external HDD and afterwards to the PS4 or FTP them right away to the PS3?
Also, which one is faster, running a game from PS3 or from external USB? Do we need to connect the USB port to the PS3's right USB port or just when using PS3Xploit?
game data tool can do it, but there are several caveats: it doesn't work with all games, the hdd must be fat32, and installing pkg files to external is slow (like over an hour for a large pkg), same with installing game data. it's just a remapping of the game folder. it's not worth it considering.Pkg's should be installed on the system last i checked, or does IrisMan has the option to play pkg files without doing so? Never heard of such a thing..
game data tool can do it, but there are several caveats: it doesn't work with all games, the hdd must be fat32, and installing pkg files to external is slow (like over an hour for a large pkg), same with installing game data. it's just a remapping of the game folder. it's not worth it considering.
sounds like a waste of time using that.Do you know if it's worth installing programs like Internet Download Manager? I don't know if they really speed up downloads but it looks like Internet Download Manager downloads parts of the files and then joins them. The latter takes a lot if time if the downloaded files are big (not to mention the time it takes to download the files' parts) so what's the advantage of these programs? Internet Download Manager often can't download from some websites and I lose my download tixket because of that.
sounds like a waste of time using that.
it's comparable I believe. they're all based on the same code, and it's really bottlenecked by the system. it's 15 year old tech.
it's comparable I believe. they're all based on the same code, and it's really bottlenecked by the system. it's 15 year old tech.