i play GTA does that mean i want to steal and kill people ?
After searching lolicon with safe search off on the image search, I fully support the decision made.
Whether there is a victim in this or not is irrelevent. CP is considered not okay because of the fact that it depicts a child in some inappropriate way, not just because there is a victim. I mean, shit, half those pictures for lolicon were of obviously pre-pubescent animated girls. Animated or not, it shouldn't be okay to store such images for what is likely just a masturbatory aid if you are making a collection out of it all. The Japanese have a different culture. Regardless of what is okay there, that doesn't mean it is auto-okay elsewhere. If your basing your sense of right and wrong around what manga you like, you need one hell of a reality check, ASAP.
After searching lolicon with safe search off on the image search, I fully support the decision made.
Whether there is a victim in this or not is irrelevent. CP is considered not okay because of the fact that it depicts a child in some inappropriate way, not just because there is a victim. I mean, shit, half those pictures for lolicon were of obviously pre-pubescent animated girls. Animated or not, it shouldn't be okay to store such images for what is likely just a masturbatory aid if you are making a collection out of it all. The Japanese have a different culture. Regardless of what is okay there, that doesn't mean it is auto-okay elsewhere. If your basing your sense of right and wrong around what manga you like, you need one hell of a reality check, ASAP.
I'm sure that not a good reason to go off of.
I'm pretty anything with safe search off is going to show off crazy things.
With that reasoning, everyone should be arrested.
Do you not know rule 34? /joke
>2011After searching lolicon with safe search off on the image search, I fully support the decision made.
Whether there is a victim in this or not is irrelevent. CP is considered not okay because of the fact that it depicts a child in some inappropriate way, not just because there is a victim.
>2011After searching lolicon with safe search off on the image search, I fully support the decision made.
Whether there is a victim in this or not is irrelevent. CP is considered not okay because of the fact that it depicts a child in some inappropriate way, not just because there is a victim.
>Believing you can have a crime without a victim
What the fuck is wrong with you?
It's not irrelevant. CP is considered not okay because it depicts the abuse of a real life child who will be living with the abuse every moment of his life as his most horrible moments are distributed over and over again across the internet.
What then? Is it a crime because you find it gross or offensive? If so, surely I should be arrested for having pictures of a corpse on my computer.
You are the one who needs a reality check here.
Note to self: Never visit Canada while ridiculous anti-loli laws are in place thanks to people who can't tell the difference between real and fiction AKA retarded moralf@gs.
Seriously I can already imagine a prison scenario that goes like this:
Random prisoner: What you in for?
Random Loli-fan prisoner: Collecting loli manga...
Randon prisoner: Whats that?
Random Loli-fan prisoner: Unrealistic Japanese p0rn comics with cute little girls.
Random prisoner: Hey everyone! We got another one, let's get'im!
So you didn't see any SFW images when you turn it off? Even then it still poor reasoning, you chose to turn it off, no one force you to,If you can't even search the term with safe search off and still find SFW images, then it is fairly obvious what the bulk of people that partake in that specific form of "art" consider its primary use.
Isn't you pic consider loli?Note to self: Never visit Canada while ridiculous anti-loli laws are in place thanks to people who can't tell the difference between real and fiction AKA retarded moralf@gs.
Seriously I can already imagine a prison scenario that goes like this:
Random Prisoner: What you in for?
Random Loli fan prisoner: Collecting loli manga...
Randon Prisoner: Whats that?
Random Loli fan prisoner: Unrealistic Japanesep0rncomics with cute little girls.
Random Prisoner: Hey everyone! We got another one, let's get'im!
People keep trying to lump loli and cp togetter when it not the same thing.If you read my above post then you would know it is illegal to have a image of CP even if it is imaginary
You must not know anything of Canadian prison, minimum jail time is 14 days which he is likely to get [actually less because he would have served some jail time already waiting for his trial so more like 12 days], and trust me all the guy is going to get is the minimum as that's the norm to any case in Canada.
People keep trying to lump loli and cp togetter when it not the same thing.If you read my above post then you would know it is illegal to have a image of CP even if it is imaginary
Loli doesn't seem to be cut down by this law.
>2011After searching lolicon with safe search off on the image search, I fully support the decision made.
Whether there is a victim in this or not is irrelevent. CP is considered not okay because of the fact that it depicts a child in some inappropriate way, not just because there is a victim.
>Believing you can have a crime without a victim
What the fuck is wrong with you?
It's not irrelevant. CP is considered not okay because it depicts the abuse of a real life child who will be living with the abuse every moment of his life as his most horrible moments are distributed over and over again across the internet.
What then? Is it a crime because you find it gross or offensive? If so, surely I should be arrested for having pictures of a corpse on my computer.
You are the one who needs a reality check here.
If it really CP and not loli then I'm fine with that. People still going lump those together.the thing is though we don't know the images on the harddrive, I'm assuming it was some nasty stuff as he as the bull shit article stated he got arrested. I'm not saying loli is bad as you said kupo3000 image is loli and is perfectly fine, but the law in Canada [and the united states for that matter] stipulates that children under 18 depicted in sexual acts is illegal so the guads where doing their jobs they wheren't in my assumptions being ignorant people who arrested the guy on their principals and not because it was against the law.