- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 2,714
- Trophies
- 2
- Age
- 49
- Location
- Another Huxleyian Dystopia
- XP
- 3,549
- Country
Here is my stance on the whole subject. What you
do in your private life should be your business. I
live in the states and it pisses me off that our
grandparents here were lied to and issued a Social
Security card on the good faith that it was only a
temporary means to help them out of the (seemly
premeditated) economical collapse and promised
that it would never be used as a means of public
identification or for keeping tabs on your person,
wealth, health, activities and what not. Now we
live under the eye of an empire who has it's nose
is every aspect of your life and who's media is
constantly present to bombard your sense with
propaganda, double think, and persuasions of all
manner, and most of those are not necessarily in
place for the benefit of the individual, or by the
will of the various social collective that make up
the whole. We are offered brand A, B, or C, and
the rest are dismissed, thrown out the window,
ignored, and forgotten.
That being said, this whole issue with "sexual
freedoms". America, like any other conquered land,
may not have the brightest and most cheerful
history. Being part Shawnee and Cherokee, and I
can say that I had a keen interest growing up in
regards to what both (actually there are usually
more than two sides, but anyhow) sides of the
story are. A great deal of American history, and
the history of European Colonization (the spread
of the proverbial Rome) in general, has to do with
controlling the mind set of the masses, getting
everyone on the same general philosophical page
and moving together with the same general vision,
towards the same general goal. Hence the reason
nearly all of the pure blooded natives of this
land, Mexico, South America, and Canada are now
extinct, along with their various social,
cultural, and spiritual spirit. What ever stands
in the way of progress must be either assimilated,
and if that is not possible, then destroyed and
made a new.
Mind you, not everyone is a mindless drone
subservient to state and media influences, and
there are many cases (most untold) in regards to
fellowship found between the natives, the
Africans, and those who moved here to the Americas
to start a new life (for better or worse). One of
face of those bonds was found in each culture's
deeper spiritual beliefs, values, and practices.
Mind you I am not talking about a specific system
of religion but am referring to the individuals
personal religious experience and how it worked in
a synergetic manner with their new found friends.
Something many of these folk found they had in
common was their humbleness before their Creator
(the mystery of mystery), a respect for The
Creation, family/tribe, society, and our selves as
individual gods (Psalm 82:6). Mind you, not
everyone is so noble or as true on the inside as
they are in the public eye, but for now I am
referring to those cases who were noble and did
rise above racism, cultural stereo typing, ego,
and so forth.
It is in fact many people of this or a like
manner (well in regards to protecting the sovereignty of family/tribal unit and it's personal values anyhow) who the media began to cater to when it first began to become wide spread. In the early days, I.E. the 19th century, most Americans of all age and sex were very literate and celebrated their most well known authors as we do rock stars
or TV celebs.
In fact it was the likes of Charles
Dickens who helped remold Christmas into what it
is today (after it's dark sexual history, and it's
many years of being banned by Christians them
selves). The public generally gravitated towards
media that reflected their aspirations. When radio
shows became all the rage, again the majority of
the radio shows reflected the personal desires and
aspirations the public at large. The same goes for
Tell-lie-Vision in its early years. The media
giants had to play it safe in those days, if they
did not cater to the public, then they would have
no audience, no one to listen, no one to read, no
one to watch.
The thing is though that the media is very
subversive, just as any movement can be,
Communism, Socialism, Democracy, Totalitarianism,
Technocracy, and so on. They have a way of
convincing the public that they stand for
everything other than what their actions say of
them, and have a way of creating false boogie men,
false impressions, etc. They can take a totally
isolated incident and the next day have half the
world convinced that it is happening everyone, in
the same context, for the same reasons, and with
the same mental/emotional attitudes. It has the
subversive power of turning brother against
brother, sister against sister, and wife against
husband and so forth.
One technique the media, or anyone who is in the
business of generational conditioning and social
engineering uses, is the taking of people's baser desires, and amplifying them. Desire, Anger, Lonliness, Confusion, etc., amplifying them and injecting them with a boost. At first subtly, then gradually, bit by tiny bit, in larger proportions.
This is in fact the very methods used by the Communist party to incite anger and a competative slant in women against their male counter parts. They women were harolded as being equal (which we all are in our own different ways), but not in a loving, compassionate, tolerant way, but with more vice and guile. This in turn turned wife against husband, and husband in against wife. This newly developed friction was then used to encourage the woman into the work place with them men and left the children left in the hands of the state educators and state media who in the end raised them.
The same thing took place in the early 20th century. As economical changes were put into place within the States, many women had no choice but to abandon the home/nest and assume a role in the work force in order to make ends meet. In fact children were used for this purpose to, but we outlawed that making child labor only acceptable when conducted across seas (out of sight out of mind).
Later in the mid 20th century the likes of Gloria Steinman and others arose to inject a false indoctrination into women's literature and provide them with a largely distorted history, and a sense that the healthy family unit as it existed was now a threat to their personal ambition and desires.
Free sex (without responsibility or consideration for the welfare of the offspring) was injected into the social consciousness with the hippie movement, then became a philisophical point in our modern Darwinian House Hold Programs like Oprah, Ellen, and Dr. Phil.
I have seen all three shows run programs stating that it is every male's "natural" urge to mate with as many women as possible. That it is part of our animalistic drive and part of what makes us who we are ultimately. They then went on to point out that in most relationships, the male eventually cheats that that the woman would be ahead to find a close female friend to bring home to their husband in order to bring stability to the family unit and keep her man at her side.
This of course is suggestive of homosexual activity, and encourages the male to want his cake and eat it to, regardless of the emotional and mental impact it may have on him, his children, or his wife.
Then of course the whole homosexual within the media seems to chant the phrase that everyone is merely coming out of the closet now so late in time because we are socially evolved enough that they finally feel safe enough to do so.
Well if you watch any movie, nearly any TV program, or listen to today's music, especially that within the world of pop which used to be considered safe and neutral, merely for fun and dancing; you find many provocative and often times contradicting songs in relation to sex, passion, love, marriage, devotion, promiscuity, and of course, homosexual experimentation, especially with the girls. Young teen girls can't seem to get enough of Katie Perry's I Kissed a Girl...
Again this movement if based upon an exaggerated history, smoke and mirrors, making islated incidents apply to all, and so on and so forth all in the name of creating a martyr, an underdog, a victim incapable of malice or mischief for everyone to feel sorry for whilst feeling guilty them selves.
The funny thing about history though is that if you look at humans and their vices, vices being what ever is socially taboo at the time and place; humans will do what ever it necessary to get their way, and they have no shame when it comes down to it. Take prohibition for instance. Alcohol was put in a very bad light in the early 20th century and people were looked down on for drinking as pot smokers generally are today, but regardless, people rose up and fought for their right to drink. The same goes for opium, slavery, public orgies (read Greek, Roman and the Catholic/Christian history that stemmed from that), and so forth. Yet, ironically, there was no homosexual revolution ever.
Not till the mid 20th century. There were no slave homosexuals, they were not segrigated, and in fact, it was not a thought on many people's minds. I know the thought never dawned on me till I saw it reflected in the outter (not inner) world. Granted, not everyone is the same, some people are led to different original thoughts than others before they are exposed and therefore influenced by the outside world (which happens too quickly anymore), but still, this was a very small group and generally it stems from people who were raised in a broken home, were molseted, etc. etc. As psychologists were once at liberty to make note of, the compassionate, non-biased ones of course, not those who tended more to create a philosophy that conformed to their personal views.
Either way, it don't matter now, the world of Psychology was forced to alter its books for the sake of not offending someone by suggesting that their homosexual tendencies may have roots in events that transpired sometime after their birth.
Anyhow, my point to all this is is that while I do not agree with this video, these people should let others live how they want to live and just learn to be brothers and sisters to them as best they can....
... I also see a culture that was once predominantly courteous when it came to dealing with sexual powers and relations between the two sexes, and who also valued the sanctity of the family unit as well as it's privacy...
...invaded by a media whose motives have been subvserive, and who's intentions have noting to do with the culture, needs, or desires of the majority who they broadcast to. War time amongst other things have divided us, shaken us up, caused us to doubt, fluster, and desperately seek solace in everywhere but where our family or tribal ancestors saw best fit for use to seek in regards to mental/emotiona/spiritual equilibrium. Is it any wonder that everyone is at odds with everyone else anymore, that no one knows what they are talking about but all assume to know it all, or that no one can hold a marriage together or raise healthy happy kids? Well amost anyone, there are still a few who shine in the darkness.
I dunno, I'm tired of typing so this ends my rant for the day. Peace! 
The media's selling you more than just products apparently, they are selling you a mind frame.
