?ECIUJ EGNARO DAM U

[BeatriceTheGolde]

Click.

Sounds great, and looks awesome. A great way to spend

Spoiler

400 Canadian dollars.

lololololololololol

 

[nitrostemp]

my brother spent that much on some audio technica headphones

 

[ojsinnerz.]

Hey dumbass, it's Audio technica ESW10JP, not the ESW9. The ESW10JP is the bigger brother and it's the limited edition.

God, how many times do I have to tell you.

 

[Shakraka]

Scoobs got TOLD

AWWWWW SHIIIIIIET

 

[ojsinnerz.]

In fact, here.

Click

525 USD

lololololoolololol

 

[Advi]

In fact, here.

Click

525 USD

lololololoolololol

TOLD

 

[War]

Holy fuck. When I saw brojsinnerz's post, I thought I had already posted in this thread and was thoroughly confused for a couple of seconds.

gg us.

 

[BeatriceTheGolde]

Hey dumbass, it's Audio technica ESW10JP, not the ESW9. The ESW10JP is the bigger brother and it's the limited edition.

God, how many times do I have to tell you.

Many say the price jump isn't worth it.

Probably including you.

 

[ojsinnerz.]

Hey dumbass, it's Audio technica ESW10JP, not the ESW9. The ESW10JP is the bigger brother and it's the limited edition.

God, how many times do I have to tell you.

Many say the price jump isn't worth it.

Probably including you.

It doesn't change the fact that the manufacture's price is over 650 dollars, the fact that it's still a refinement of the ESW9, and you were being a complete idiot by labeling a completely different product in their line-up.

But the price for any headphones over 400 isn't worth it. The law of diminishing returns would be the reason why, although I'm sure some many will disagree.

 

[Mei-o]