dsorganize not working for dsi

Discussion in 'NDS - Emulation and Homebrew' started by oceangoyo, Jan 16, 2011.

  1. oceangoyo
    OP

    oceangoyo Member

    Newcomer
    22
    0
    Nov 1, 2008
    United States
    Was reading in an old thread that dsorganize did not work for the dsi. Anyone know of a fix for this in the last 2 years that was discovered?
     
  2. Rydian

    Rydian Resident Furvertâ„¢

    Member
    27,883
    8,103
    Feb 4, 2010
    United States
    Cave Entrance, Watching Cyan Write Letters
    I don't even think the homebrew has been updated since it was found to not function on a DSi.
     
  3. oceangoyo
    OP

    oceangoyo Member

    Newcomer
    22
    0
    Nov 1, 2008
    United States
    I dont know dude, was just checking to see if anyone knew something i didnt.
     
  4. SifJar

    SifJar Not a pirate

    Member
    6,022
    891
    Apr 4, 2009
    The homebrew was abandoned by its creator when someone leaked the source just before the last release, which was buggy as a result of its abandonment. However, I don't think anyone ever managed to build the source, because it is incomplete and relies of libraries no one has and stuff like that. In other words, its probably not gonna be updated.
     
  5. twiztidsinz

    twiztidsinz Taiju Yamada Fan

    Member
    4,981
    5
    Dec 23, 2008
    United States
    I've heard that disabling WiFi should fix / partially fix DSOrganize.

    Time Paradox much?
    If it was abandoned because the source was leaked.... then the source wouldn't have been 'buggy due to abandonment'.
    If the source was buggy due to abandonment... then the leak wouldn't have mattered since it was already abandoned.
     
  6. CannonFoddr

    CannonFoddr Regular GBATemp Lurker

    Member
    4,109
    65
    Sep 23, 2006
    Sitting by computer
    Yep.... I can vouch for that - Turn off the WiFi on the DSi & it'll work, turn it on & as soon as you try to change a setting or screen - it'll lock up
     
  7. SifJar

    SifJar Not a pirate

    Member
    6,022
    891
    Apr 4, 2009
    No. The source was leaked before version 3.2 was finished. The developer then decided not to bother finishing it, and released a buggy, unfinished version of 3.2, which was what the leaked source was of. No paradox. The reason it was buggy was because it was abandoned before it was finished, and it was abandoned because the source leaked.