Hacking Can 3DS downgrade to firmware 10.1 max?

[The Catboy]

Nothing is happening now but we'll keep working because we want to get it done.

I am going to be honest, you made a bold statement and now you are saying this. I honestly don't believe that within 24 hours we are going to see anything.
You can't make bold statements like that, without evidence, then retract your statement like this, it just comes off as click baiting and trolling.

 

[DiegitusXD]

I am going to be honest, you made a bold statement and now you are saying this. I honestly don't believe that within 24 hours we are going to see anything.
You can't make bold statements like that, without evidence, then retract your statement like this, it just comes off as click baiting and trolling.

They said PROBABLY in 24 hours...

 

[The Catboy]

They said PROBABLY in 24 hours...

Regardless of the vague wording, it's still obvious click baiting without evidence. I'm sorry, but I am remaining skeptical. After all of the others claiming to do the same thing only be revealed to be a troll. Until there is solid evidence, I won't get my hopes up.

 

[Mrrraou]

I am going to be honest, you made a bold statement and now you are saying this. I honestly don't believe that within 24 hours we are going to see anything.
You can't make bold statements like that, without evidence, then retract your statement like this, it just comes off as click baiting and trolling.

He said it was possible on Twitter too early, it figured that it wasn't working as expected. Now, we don't promise anything in the next 24 hours or anything. We're just working on it. We'll do a release if something works.
(Or you could read smea's explanation to understand too.)

 

[DiegitusXD]

Regardless of the vague wording, it's still obvious click baiting without evidence. I'm sorry, but I am remaining skeptical. After all of the others claiming to do the same thing only be revealed to be a troll. Until there is solid evidence, I won't get my hopes up.

It can be real or not and obviously they said that the exploit could work or not so...

 

[The Catboy]

I will keep my mouth shut for now and just watch this thread. I just don't want to get burned again, since the release of 9.3, there have been way too many promising a kernel exploit only to fail and it gets very discouraging.

 

[hellionz]

I will keep my mouth shut for now and just watch this thread. I just don't want to get burned again, since the release of 9.3, there have been way too many promising a kernel exploit only to fail and it gets very discouraging.

u can always make ur own work and take a kernel exploit for yourself....but always is better cry .

this is vaporware again...remember the SOONtm

 

[ayy.lmao!]

I will keep my mouth shut for now and just watch this thread. I just don't want to get burned again, since the release of 9.3, there have been way too many promising a kernel exploit only to fail and it gets very discouraging.

Never trust anybody who doesn't release a PoC during thread creation.

 

[Pandaxclone2]

Never trust anybody who doesn't release a PoC during thread creation.

Pingo's the one who talked about it maybe happening, not the OP of this thread. He never made any thread on this so at least he's waiting until he does have something.

 

[Tony_93]

Pingo's the one who talked about it maybe happening, not the OP of this thread. He never made any thread on this so at least he's waiting until he does have something.

That's like when some random guy from Reddit claims to have a kernel exploit and people rush here to create threads about it happening...

OP shouldn't try rushing to share his "info" just to be the cool kid who told everyone else about the incoming exploit.

 

[Pandaxclone2]

That's like when some random guy from Reddit claims to have a kernel exploit and people rush here to create threads about it happening...

OP shouldn't try rushing to share his "info" just to be the cool kid who told everyone else about the incoming exploit.

What I'm trying to say is that the person who's started working on this isn't to blame at all. Agreed that the OP shouldn't be putting this up and just wait until something like a PoC shows, even then the developer should be the one doing it.

 

[ayy.lmao!]

What I'm trying to say is that the person who's started working on this isn't to blame at all. Agreed that the OP shouldn't be putting this up and just wait until something like a PoC shows, even then the developer should be the one doing it.

He confirmed downgrade possibilities in a twitter post. He's the one that created the false hype. What's not to blame?

 

[Mrrraou]

He confirmed downgrade possibilities in a twitter post. He's the one that created the false hype. What's not to blame?

Confirmed only if it was possible. Only a PoC was announced.

 

[ayy.lmao!]

Confirmed only if it was possible. Only a PoC was announced.

 

[Mrrraou]

look at the date please
(Tip: he said that even before HANS was released)

 

[TuxSH]

He confirmed downgrade possibilities in a twitter post. He's the one that created the false hype. What's not to blame?

At least he does spend his free time working on it, unlike many people like you (and I).

Even, if, of course, he is jumping to conclusions too fast.

 

[ayy.lmao!]

look at the date please
(Tip: he said that even before HANS was released)

I think I've proven my point enough. He didn't retract the statement on twitter and he posted it after "trouble running custom code" was posted.

At least he does spend his free time working on it, unlike many people like you (and I).

Even, if, of course, he is jumping to conclusions too fast.

I don't mind people who do that. But seriously? Announcing a PoC before it works?

 

[Mrrraou]

I think I've proven my point enough. He didn't retract the statement on twitter and he posted it after "trouble running custom code" was posted.

I don't mind people who do that. But seriously? Announcing a PoC before it works?

As TuxSH said,

he is jumping to conclusions too fast.

And we thought that eShop had am:net, too. But it doesn't.
(We didn't understand 3dbrew quite well, as 3dbrew says that eShop calls something in am:net but actually it's the nim:s service which does it)

 

[ayy.lmao!]

And we thought that eShop had am:net, too. But it doesn't.

And this is the only reason I'm pissed, because you published your "thoughts" and confirmed them, causing a shitstorm

 

[JustPingo]

And this is the only reason I'm pissed, because you published your "thoughts" and confirmed them, causing a shitstorm

And then we could continue to play on words and say we're not the ones actually making the shitstorm.