nope the first version wasnt open source, I was there man, I never used it because it lacked the important thing a backup loaderUh, it was always open sourced.
nope the first version wasnt open source, I was there man, I never used it because it lacked the important thing a backup loaderUh, it was always open sourced.
at first it was closed source guys, then they used a different approach, but whatever
It was not meant, at the beginning, to be open-source, so you can expect some messed up code here.
yes keep telling yourself that man, I guess you were there too, gw haterIt's the original rxTools source code (just with a bunch of improvements over time.)
God I hate you GW fanboys who have their dick shoved so far up your ass. I didn't even say anything negative about GW in this thread. You're just salty because you're wrong and you know it.yes keep telling yourself that man, I guess you were there too, gw hater
Depends on the country and what you're doing with the hack.Is hacking the switch considered illegal? (Not talking about TX)
Against ToS, but not illegal.Is hacking the switch considered illegal? (Not talking about TX, just in general)
Again, Gateway was in a similar situation to TX. Now with free and open-source alternatives, Gateway hasn't provided support in years. Now I'm not saying TX will stop supporting their product like Gateway because they've got a better reputation and history, but being first doesn't always equal the best.Well, if you'd hurried it the hell up, maybe TX wouldn't have bee so popular. But whilst the scene babies were whining and moaning and playing all "I have too many morals to release a backup loader" someone took their thunder.
The CFW is free, the backup loader is not. AFAIK the stolen code isn't in the backup loader. :xCool and awesome. I'd be fine if they were stealing code if the product was free, but it isn't.
I'd be fine if they were stealing code if the product was free, it isn't.
Gateway was spotty with support since its birth.Again, Gateway was in a similar situation to TX. Now with free and open-source alternatives, Gateway hasn't provided support in years. Now I'm not saying TX will stop supporting their product like Gateway because they've got a better reputation and history, but being first doesn't always equal the best.
Again, that's not how the GPLv2 works.The CFW is free, the backup loader is not. AFAIK the stolen code isn't in the backup loader. :x
Again, that's not how the GPLv2 works.
Scene "babies" as you call them are at least producing something that tries to be fair to everyone (including Nintendo) while trying to involve a whole community.Well, if you'd hurried it the hell up, maybe TX wouldn't have bee so popular. But whilst the scene babies were whining and moaning and playing all "I have too many morals to release a backup loader" someone took their thunder.
I won't argue that and TX is already up to 1.2 in about a week, but its still a fallacy to say that they're the best because they were first.Gateway was spotty with support since its birth.
That it is.I won't argue that and TX is already up to 1.2 in about a week, but its still a fallacy to say that they're the best because they were first.
IDK, the fact you dismissed it because "the cfw is free". You still have to provide attribution and make the source available.Show me where I implied it did. Thanks.