That sounds like anti-piracy tools, which is pretty much the opposite of what it does.>apTools<
I've personally been calling it rxPasta, giving credit to Roxas75 still, but then AHP_person is kinda left out.
That sounds like anti-piracy tools, which is pretty much the opposite of what it does.>apTools<
Yes, I posted that a few pages back. You need to have the DSiware game on both sysnand and emunand for it to work, they don't need to be linked.Do DSi Games and DSiWare work (I don't know the difference between them).
That sounds like anti-piracy tools, which is pretty much the opposite of what it does.
I've personally been calling it rxPasta, giving credit to Roxas75 still, but then AHP_person is kinda left out.
That sounds like anti-piracy tools, which is pretty much the opposite of what it does.
I've personally been calling it rxPasta, giving credit to Roxas75 still, but then AHP_person is kinda left out.
Yes, I posted that a few pages back. You need to have the DSiware game on both sysnand and emunand for it to work, they don't need to be linked.
It appears GBA games also have to have a copy on sysnand to work on emunand. (emunand does not have to be linked with sysnand). If I start a GBA game on emunand that's not also installed to sysnand, it won't boot.
The patches wouldn't work on an older firm, and rxTools checks the firm it's using before injecting it and patching it.@AHP_person if I decrypt NATIVE_FIRM of 9.0/9.2 and then re-encrypt it as downloaded by cdn_firm.exe (titlekey as per the cetk and IV 00000049000000000000000000000000), will rxTools and your patches load that firmware.bin up?
I think a little change is necessary, like rxtools+Is the renaming really necessary? It's still rxTools in every way except for the signature check patch. And naming it after Pasta doesn't make much sense, cause there's still no sauce.
Is the renaming really necessary? It's still rxTools in every way except for the signature check patch. And naming it after Pasta doesn't make much sense, cause there's still no sauce.
Annoying. So much for convenient kernel hax with patched signatures.The patches wouldn't work on an older firm, and rxTools checks the firm it's using before injecting it and patching it.
Will you consider possibly open sourcing the method you used to decrypt, patch, and recrypt? Pwease. ^^ Would love to tinker with it as do many others I'm sure.The patches wouldn't work on an older firm, and rxTools checks the firm it's using before injecting it and patching it.
Just to confirm what Apache said.
To use custom GBA games, you must install a copy of the CIA into sysNAND AND emuNAND.
The patched AGB_FIRM only has to be installed into emuNAND though. You can leave sysNAND AGB_FIRM stock.
I don't think Apache has said what you asked, either way, I would like to know also.
I'm gonna add this info to the OPLook back a page:
"It appears GBA games also have to have a copy on sysnand to work on emunand. (emunand does not have to be linked with sysnand). If I start a GBA game on emunand that's not also installed to sysnand, it won't boot."
This was the problem I've been having all day. If I removed the CIA from sysNAND, I couldn't launch it from emuNAND.