Hacking NTFS or FAT32 usbloading

Which one

  • Use FAT32

    Votes: 5 83.3%
  • Use NTFS

    Votes: 1 16.7%

  • Total voters
    6

mauifrog

DA KINE WiiHacker
OP
Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
1,587
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
392
Country
United States
I am at the in laws, and have just setup their wii. I picked up a 320g HD and am getting ready to copy everything from my 250 wbfs over to either a FAT32 or NTFS partition. However, I have never used either, and won't have much time to do much testing, so which should I use FAT32 or NTFS. The only other thing I will put on the drive will be divx/xvid movies less than 2g, so most everything will be way less than 4g. But there are a few games over 4g.

I can't make up my mind, any input would be great.
 

Fat D

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2006
Messages
1,136
Trophies
0
XP
454
Country
Germany
Games can be split to fit in the FAT32 constraints, and FAT32 not only enables writing (for dumping etc.), but also allows you to use the partition for more homebrew apps than NTFS would allow.
 

WiiJohn

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 11, 2009
Messages
46
Trophies
0
Location
UK
XP
34
Country
Hi Maui, I haven't taken the plunge yet, still thinking about it.
One draw back or extra to do, is it will only work with cIOS222/223 mLOAD or with cIOSx Rev 19 or 20.
All else seems a plus.
 

Blue-K

No right of appeal.
Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2008
Messages
2,572
Trophies
0
Location
Helvetica
XP
209
Country
Swaziland
FAT32. And if you format it with a 32kb Cluster, you can easely switch to SNEEK by only converting the games, if you have enough of the cIOS-Method (like me)
tongue.gif
.
 

rafao

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Messages
53
Trophies
0
XP
24
Country
Brazil
Use NTFS, if you format to FAT32, you drive is destroyed.
I've lost my USB Flash Drive because of format (FAT32), and i saving my USB Flash re-installed the U3 Launchpad and unistalled after. My USB Flash Drive does slower after this problem.

Your Drive don't have U3 to save your drive. You will have more carefully with fat32 drives. Or your drive has been destroyed.
 

Elritha

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
2,037
Trophies
0
Website
Visit site
XP
122
Country
Canada
Fat32 if the drive isn't being used for anything else. Personally I have mine formatted as NTFS as I use the drive for other storage also.
 

elimist

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2009
Messages
282
Trophies
0
XP
34
Country
United States
Use fat32 for the wii because only a few apps have ntfs support. I have my harddisk formatted with 200GB fat and 500 GB ntfs because I keep large files like pc backups and rainbowtables on the ntfs.
 

moosehunter

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2008
Messages
219
Trophies
0
XP
342
Country
United States
OR you could have a FAT32 partition as the first partition and a NTFS as the second. That way you get the advantages of both and lose most of the disadvantages.
 

PsyBlade

Snake Charmer
Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2009
Messages
2,204
Trophies
0
Location
Sol III
XP
458
Country
Gambia, The
rafao said:
Use NTFS, if you format to FAT32, you drive is destroyed.
I've lost my USB Flash Drive because of format (FAT32), and i saving my USB Flash re-installed the U3 Launchpad and unistalled after. My USB Flash Drive does slower after this problem.

Your Drive don't have U3 to save your drive. You will have more carefully with fat32 drives. Or your drive has been destroyed.
Bullshit!

You can not destroy a hdd/sdd/sd/usb-stick
by partitioning it, formating to a different filesystem, etc
of course you can destroy the files on it but you will always be able to get to a state whwere you can put new files on it.

Fat on USB-stick works fine

I dont know what you did wrong in the begining
but I have a pretty good idea what the cause of the slowdown is

1) most flash based media gets slower once data has been written to each sector (unless it supports trim)
if you did a full (as opposed to quick) fat/ntfs format thats your problem

2) flash based media needs partitions to start at specific places to be fast (alignment)
recent windows versions do that automatically, other tools might or might not
 

dole

Well-Known Member
Newcomer
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
66
Trophies
1
Location
CONGRATURATION
Website
Visit site
XP
140
Country
United States
PsyBlade said:
rafao said:
Use NTFS, if you format to FAT32, you drive is destroyed.
I've lost my USB Flash Drive because of format (FAT32), and i saving my USB Flash re-installed the U3 Launchpad and unistalled after. My USB Flash Drive does slower after this problem.

Your Drive don't have U3 to save your drive. You will have more carefully with fat32 drives. Or your drive has been destroyed.
Bullshit!

You can not destroy a hdd/sdd/sd/usb-stick
by partitioning it, formating to a different filesystem, etc
of course you can destroy the files on it but you will always be able to get to a state whwere you can put new files on it.

Fat on USB-stick works fine

I dont know what you did wrong in the begining
but I have a pretty good idea what the cause of the slowdown is

1) most flash based media gets slower once data has been written to each sector (unless it supports trim)
if you did a full (as opposed to quick) fat/ntfs format thats your problem

2) flash based media needs partitions to start at specific places to be fast (alignment)
recent windows versions do that automatically, other tools might or might not

He's mentioning U3, which is the goofy flash drive system for holding portable apps... apples and pears difference between a flash drive and hard drive loading.
With suites out there like PortableAppz, there's not too much useful for keeping the stupid U3 parititions other than for installing rootkits and other crap if you've got physical access to a computer.
 

VashTS

Beat it, son
Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
4,308
Trophies
1
Age
39
Location
Upstate NY
XP
3,768
Country
United States
ive used both and i regretted starting with ntfs. its not terrible as long as you make a smaller fat32 partition. but i was with ntfs and fat32 for a while, wanting to go to total fat32, now that i did, i am very happy with it. its actually a lot faster for loading compared to ntfs. ntfs takes a while to seek, probably due to lack of support from the cios directly.
 

Bladexdsl

fanboys triggered 9k+
Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2008
Messages
21,190
Trophies
2
Location
Queensland
XP
12,358
Country
Australia
rafao said:
Use NTFS, if you format to FAT32, you drive is destroyed.
I've lost my USB Flash Drive because of format (FAT32), and i saving my USB Flash re-installed the U3 Launchpad and unistalled after. My USB Flash Drive does slower after this problem.

Your Drive don't have U3 to save your drive. You will have more carefully with fat32 drives. Or your drive has been destroyed.
double bullshit! i have a fat32, ntfs and wbfs all on 1 drive and their still working all perfect! you must have just gotten shitty drive.
 

ChuckBartowski

GBATemp Nerd Herd Specialist
Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
916
Trophies
0
Age
29
Location
Burbank, CA
Website
ruincommunity.net
XP
277
Country
United States
Bladexdsl said:
rafao said:
Use NTFS, if you format to FAT32, you drive is destroyed.
I've lost my USB Flash Drive because of format (FAT32), and i saving my USB Flash re-installed the U3 Launchpad and unistalled after. My USB Flash Drive does slower after this problem.

Your Drive don't have U3 to save your drive. You will have more carefully with fat32 drives. Or your drive has been destroyed.
double bullshit! i have a fat32, ntfs and wbfs all on 1 drive and their still working all perfect! you must have just gotten shitty drive.
The guy is just ignorant and shouldnt be posting in this thread is what has happened here. But yeah, FAT32 fo sho.
 

C.S.I.

Well-Known Member
Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2010
Messages
411
Trophies
1
Location
Down under
Website
Visit site
XP
68
Country
FAT32 for me. NTFS is note widely supported enough.

Or as stated, split into FAT32 for the Wii, and NTFS for PC Stuff, if you can be bothered keeping on moving the HDD around, which I woudnt do.

Better to keep the HDD just for the Wii, me thinks. =)
 

Karpo_007

Member
Newcomer
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
18
Trophies
0
XP
34
Country
Finland
VashTS said:
but i was with ntfs and fat32 for a while, wanting to go to total fat32, now that i did, i am very happy with it. its actually a lot faster for loading compared to ntfs. ntfs takes a while to seek, probably due to lack of support from the cios directly.

Has anyone else noticed a notable speed difference? I didn't even consider fat32 only because of split files and higher fragmentation.
 

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum

General chit-chat
Help Users
    AncientBoi @ AncientBoi: rofl