NTFS or FAT32 usbloading

Discussion in 'Wii - Hacking' started by mauifrog, Aug 6, 2010.

?

Which one

  1. Use FAT32

    1 vote(s)
    50.0%
  2. Use NTFS

    1 vote(s)
    50.0%
Aug 6, 2010

NTFS or FAT32 usbloading by mauifrog at 10:11 PM (9,788 Views / 0 Likes) 22 replies

  1. mauifrog
    OP

    Member mauifrog DA KINE WiiHacker

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,585
    Country:
    United States
    I am at the in laws, and have just setup their wii. I picked up a 320g HD and am getting ready to copy everything from my 250 wbfs over to either a FAT32 or NTFS partition. However, I have never used either, and won't have much time to do much testing, so which should I use FAT32 or NTFS. The only other thing I will put on the drive will be divx/xvid movies less than 2g, so most everything will be way less than 4g. But there are a few games over 4g.

    I can't make up my mind, any input would be great.
     


  2. jelmew

    Member jelmew GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    146
    Country:
    Netherlands
    Wii backup managers will split the .wbfs files automatically on fat32
     
  3. cheez203

    Member cheez203 GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    131
    Country:
    Canada
    and the game ripping to drive is much more stable on fat32.
     
  4. Fat D

    Member Fat D GBAtemp Maniac

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,117
    Country:
    Germany
    Games can be split to fit in the FAT32 constraints, and FAT32 not only enables writing (for dumping etc.), but also allows you to use the partition for more homebrew apps than NTFS would allow.
     
  5. WiiJohn

    Newcomer WiiJohn Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    46
    Location:
    UK
    Country:
    United Kingdom
    Hi Maui, I haven't taken the plunge yet, still thinking about it.
    One draw back or extra to do, is it will only work with cIOS222/223 mLOAD or with cIOSx Rev 19 or 20.
    All else seems a plus.
     
  6. Blue-K

    Member Blue-K No right of appeal.

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2008
    Messages:
    2,572
    Location:
    Helvetica
    Country:
    Switzerland
    FAT32. And if you format it with a 32kb Cluster, you can easely switch to SNEEK by only converting the games, if you have enough of the cIOS-Method (like me) [​IMG].
     
  7. rafao

    Newcomer rafao Advanced Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    Messages:
    53
    Country:
    Brazil
    Use NTFS, if you format to FAT32, you drive is destroyed.
    I've lost my USB Flash Drive because of format (FAT32), and i saving my USB Flash re-installed the U3 Launchpad and unistalled after. My USB Flash Drive does slower after this problem.

    Your Drive don't have U3 to save your drive. You will have more carefully with fat32 drives. Or your drive has been destroyed.
     
  8. Elritha

    Member Elritha GBAtemp Addict

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    2,037
    Country:
    Canada
    Fat32 if the drive isn't being used for anything else. Personally I have mine formatted as NTFS as I use the drive for other storage also.
     
  9. mauifrog
    OP

    Member mauifrog DA KINE WiiHacker

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,585
    Country:
    United States
    Thank You, FAT32 it is.
     
  10. elimist

    Member elimist GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2009
    Messages:
    282
    Country:
    United States
    Use fat32 for the wii because only a few apps have ntfs support. I have my harddisk formatted with 200GB fat and 500 GB ntfs because I keep large files like pc backups and rainbowtables on the ntfs.
     
  11. moosehunter

    Member moosehunter GBAtemp Regular

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2008
    Messages:
    199
    Country:
    United States
    OR you could have a FAT32 partition as the first partition and a NTFS as the second. That way you get the advantages of both and lose most of the disadvantages.
     
  12. PsyBlade

    Member PsyBlade Snake Charmer

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    2,204
    Location:
    Sol III
    Country:
    Germany
    Bullshit!

    You can not destroy a hdd/sdd/sd/usb-stick
    by partitioning it, formating to a different filesystem, etc
    of course you can destroy the files on it but you will always be able to get to a state whwere you can put new files on it.

    Fat on USB-stick works fine

    I dont know what you did wrong in the begining
    but I have a pretty good idea what the cause of the slowdown is

    1) most flash based media gets slower once data has been written to each sector (unless it supports trim)
    if you did a full (as opposed to quick) fat/ntfs format thats your problem

    2) flash based media needs partitions to start at specific places to be fast (alignment)
    recent windows versions do that automatically, other tools might or might not
     
  13. dole

    Newcomer dole Advanced Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    Messages:
    65
    Location:
    CONGRATURATION
    Country:
    United States
    He's mentioning U3, which is the goofy flash drive system for holding portable apps... apples and pears difference between a flash drive and hard drive loading.
    With suites out there like PortableAppz, there's not too much useful for keeping the stupid U3 parititions other than for installing rootkits and other crap if you've got physical access to a computer.
     
  14. VashTS

    Member VashTS Beat it, son

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,653
    Location:
    Upstate NY
    Country:
    United States
    ive used both and i regretted starting with ntfs. its not terrible as long as you make a smaller fat32 partition. but i was with ntfs and fat32 for a while, wanting to go to total fat32, now that i did, i am very happy with it. its actually a lot faster for loading compared to ntfs. ntfs takes a while to seek, probably due to lack of support from the cios directly.
     
  15. Bladexdsl

    Member Bladexdsl ZOMG my posts...it's over 9000!!!

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2008
    Messages:
    14,347
    Location:
    Queensland
    Country:
    Australia
    double bullshit! i have a fat32, ntfs and wbfs all on 1 drive and their still working all perfect! you must have just gotten shitty drive.
     
  16. ChuckBartowski

    Member ChuckBartowski GBATemp Nerd Herd Specialist

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    917
    Location:
    Burbank, CA
    Country:
    United States
    The guy is just ignorant and shouldnt be posting in this thread is what has happened here. But yeah, FAT32 fo sho.
     
  17. MLRX

    Member MLRX GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    378
    Country:
    United States
    fat32 has better overall support and you wont need to change from it most likely
     
  18. C.S.I.

    Member C.S.I. GBAtemp Fan

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2010
    Messages:
    410
    Location:
    Down under
    Country:
    Australia
    FAT32 for me. NTFS is note widely supported enough.

    Or as stated, split into FAT32 for the Wii, and NTFS for PC Stuff, if you can be bothered keeping on moving the HDD around, which I woudnt do.

    Better to keep the HDD just for the Wii, me thinks. =)
     
  19. Karpo_007

    Newcomer Karpo_007 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Messages:
    18
    Country:
    Finland
    Has anyone else noticed a notable speed difference? I didn't even consider fat32 only because of split files and higher fragmentation.
     
  20. XFlak

    Member XFlak Wiitired but still kicking

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Messages:
    9,122
    Location:
    Ontario
    Country:
    Canada
    if anything, fat32 is faster (some1 just reported that within the last hr in another thread)

    the split files makes no difference, and 90% of wii games are under 4GBs so they do not have to be split
     

Share This Page