That's why you should have an updated sysmmc for online play and an emummc for cfw that you don't have to update right awayExcept you play online
That's why you should have an updated sysmmc for online play and an emummc for cfw that you don't have to update right awayExcept you play online
That is what my statement was intended to imply. I'm not even talking about emummcThat's why you should have an updated sysmmc for online play and an emummc for cfw that you don't have to update right away
NeXT is not the company Steve Jobs created when was fired from Apple?
Very much alive. Here it is. It's also available on a certain sigpatches site (the Three Cats site) that we aren't allowed to link to (quick Google search is all it takes to find it).so is this dead? cuz link is dead
Already asked about this before.If anybody is interested in the source let us to know
Also I wonder if TotalJustice is ok with the changes going around, they seems a little bit off, but I am not a very good programmer. I think the changes could be applied on better way.@impeeza
Thx for the source code dude, appreciate it, so now that i got 1.5.0 and 1.5.1 sources i can compare source code updates
@TotalJustice
Do i have your permission to host this on an git (Chinese and/or Russian) ? To keep this alive, i'll take full responsability if big N comes for meh
Also I wonder if TotalJustice is ok with the changes going around, they seems a little bit off, but I am not a very good programmer. I think the changes could be applied on better way.
Yeah, feel free to host it wherever you want. The license is MIT, which means you can do whatever you want with code, even taking it closed source is fine@impeeza
Thx for the source code dude, appreciate it, so now that i got 1.5.0 and 1.5.1 sources i can compare source code updates
@TotalJustice
Do i have your permission to host this on an git (Chinese and/or Russian) ? To keep this alive, i'll take full responsability if big N comes for meh
As long as it works then it's fine I guess. My only concern is that in the next major fw, if es was to break again, that it may continue to work only for some people based on what the pattern sys-patch is searching for. That will cause a bit of confusion, especially as the pattern is sometimes named es6 or es7 but all using different patterns, so without looking at the source, it's hard to tell why it's broken etc.Also I wonder if TotalJustice is ok with the changes going around, they seems a little bit off, but I am not a very good programmer. I think the changes could be applied on better way.
Yeah, feel free to host it wherever you want. The license is MIT, which means you can do whatever you want with code, even taking it closed source is fine
As long as it works then it's fine I guess. My only concern is that in the next major fw, if es was to break again, that it may continue to work only for some people based on what the pattern sys-patch is searching for. That will cause a bit of confusion, especially as the pattern is sometimes named es6 or es7 but all using different patterns, so without looking at the source, it's hard to tell why it's broken etc.
I should've added the pattern found + the offset it was found to the log file, that would help clear up some confusion.
Some people were complaining about being unable to download from Yandex so here ya go, some mirrors:Well the changes was some few lines, the newer code can be found on:
View attachment 428974
Post automatically merged:
By the way for those looking for IPS Patch Creator:
https://gbatemp.net/threads/sigpatc...kate-fss0-fusee-package3.571543/post-10391161
Pretty neat, thx caralhoSome people were complaining about being unable to download from Yandex so here ya go, some mirrors:
1.5.1
1.5.1 Source
Thank you so much for your answer, so my concerns are correct, the code shouldn't create a new es7 pattern, instead corrected the existing es6 to be able to work on FW 14+ as described. Am I right?Yeah, feel free to host it wherever you want. The license is MIT, which means you can do whatever you want with code, even taking it closed source is fine
As long as it works then it's fine I guess. My only concern is that in the next major fw, if es was to break again, that it may continue to work only for some people based on what the pattern sys-patch is searching for. That will cause a bit of confusion, especially as the pattern is sometimes named es6 or es7 but all using different patterns, so without looking at the source, it's hard to tell why it's broken etc.
I should've added the pattern found + the offset it was found to the log file, that would help clear up some confusion.
Yep, it will be much better.so my concerns are correct, the code shouldn't create a new es7 pattern, instead corrected the existing es6 to be able to work on FW 14+ as described. Am I right?
Better post there.By the way for those looking for IPS Patch Creator
E.g. here.The modified code was around in some discussion channels so anybody could build it