Hacking Xecuter OS Cracking Challange Accepted by ....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted User
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 24,784
  • Replies Replies 124
  • Likes Likes 14
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not that I'm pro piracy but developers would get paid regardless there on the payroll
the company may go out of business, stock prices may change but the developers are entitled to their wages whether they sell one copy or 100 million
I mean now you're just justifying it. Still doesnt make it right.

1 person or a million people doing it, still doesnt justify doing it. And that is my point. You can go to the extremes with examples like 1 person dumping a rom and the rest of 99% of the consumer pirating it, the developer would be out of buisness, although that isnt realistic, I try to look at it like I was in their shoes, working tirelessly to provide good games for the consumer and basically it being stolen. Its no different than you going to the store and grabbing the cartridge off the shelf and walking out without paying for it. Granted it's worse doing that because of cart costs, but you catch my drift :P

I'm not claiming to be a saint here either so dont crucify me. When it comes to piracy, most of us here cant say we've never downloaded a game online, but in most cases I'll choose not to pirate things because it's the morally right thing to do. Money makes the world go round they say, if we stop paying for shit, people will stop making it.

Anyways, im rambling now. :P
 
Last edited by ,
the only decent thing to say about this fight is ... live and let live !!
if people want to pay for something, it is their choice. you do not have to buy that is your own choice

So natehaxx fuck up with your threads and reactions about TX!!
Everyone is allowed an opinion, just like you are allowed to be a dick. :P
 
  • Like
Reactions: TAUSENN and teusjuh
My thought on this is the sounds from people that it would be easy to implement a backup loader but they don't want to already piracy. But theyll reverse this and release it to the public? I doubt it, I could totally see them reversing it and showing off. But why would they release a piracy method if they were opposed to doing it themselves?
because the only thing that gets these moralfags more butthurt than "piracy" is people profiting from "piracy"

EDIT:
i think another thing that bothers the likes of F0 and reswitched is the fact that this will fracture the scene
having one paid CFW and another free one it just hinders the scene from developing but it is their own fault for being moralfags and trying to supress backup something we all know is inevitable anyways , an exercise in futility that just gives birth to DRM devices like TX SX OS
that just split the scene and cause unnecessary complications
they are so triggered about TX making a profit for something they also discovered before or at the same time independently either way
but if they had not suppressed backup loading and released it before TX then they would have nothing to be salty about
they caused the stuation then they get butthurt over it, they knew for a long time TX was releasing something that would enable backups
not like this was a surprise to anyone
 
Last edited by weatMod,
As long as they not proof Backup Loading this stupid Twitter guys who want fame can go somewhere :P
 
So just because a team sells a DRM key that means these guys have every right to steal their work and RE it? sounds like some devs are just salty.
More like they took open information and applied DRM to it because they enabled cartridge loading, but sure think that way if you like.
 
How is it that hard to understand if i pirate something i was never planning on buying in the first place the company involved isnt losing anything? .-.

I know people have their morals, but god lord, stop pushing your agenda down people's throats.
 
How is it that hard to understand if i pirate something i was never planning on buying the company involved isnt losing anything? .-.

I know people have their morals, but god lord, stop pushing your agenda down people's throats.
That's not true
If I have the choice to pirate something I'll do it instead of buying it.

Stop making excuses. People like you are the worse
 
That's not true
If I have the choice to pirate something I'll do it instead of buying it.

Stop making excuses. People like you are the worse
Im not using it as an excuse, but tell me what is false about the statement? The company in question isnt getting my money since i never planned on expending it in the first place, so?
 
Im not using it as an excuse, but tell me what is false about the statement? The company in question isnt getting my money since i never planned on expending it in the first place, so?
Well they don’t want you playing for free what they spent millions $$$ making. Try making a 99 cent game .. and watch everyone crack it and download it for free. Get it now ?
 
Im not using it as an excuse, but tell me what is false about the statement? The company in question isnt getting my money since i never planned on expending it in the first place, so?
Some piracy is lost sale
Just because you won't buy the games doesn't mean someone else wouldn't also , if they had a choice to either pirate or buy it.

It's pretty dumb to have that train of thought. If a real awesome game comes out and it's encrypted to hell, majority of those who would have pirated it, would have no choice but to buy it
 
DdWyJhTVQAEC4yh.jpg


if somebody can do it then him
Dude, you've gone proper click bait troll haven't you. Quick tip, cut it the fuck out
 
Some piracy is lost sale
Just because you won't buy the games doesn't mean someone else wouldn't also , if they had a choice to either pirate or buy it.

It's pretty dumb to have that train of thought. If a real awesome game comes out and it's encrypted to hell, majority of those who would have pirated it, would have no choice but to buy it
Im exposing my case. Leave the other people out of this post. And the point is still the same, no buy = no lost sale. You still cant prove how it means a lost sale when there wasnt even the intention of buying the product in the first place.
 
Im exposing my case. Leave the other people out of this post. And the point is still the same, no buy = no lost sale. You still cant prove how it means a lost sale when there wasnt even the intention of buying the product in the first place.
You can relate it to anything really. Imagine talking about a dinner at a restaurant.. You either buy it or walk out and not pay after eating it. You are stealing food that that establishment purchased and then had an employee cook it for you. You cant be that dense to think mkney grows on trees, it's obvious you know nothing about responsibility if you think it's okay to steals things. Cause and affect man....
 
You can relate it to anything really. Imagine talking about a dinner at a restaurant.. You either buy it or walk out and not pay after eating it. You are stealing food that that establishment purchased and then had an employee cook it for you. You cant be that dense to think mkney grows on trees, it's obvious you know nothing about responsibility if you think it's okay to steals things. Cause and affect man....
That's not the same thing as piracy.. Some people in here.. I swear.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum