Hacking Is it possible to "dual boot" 2 CFW's

Status
Not open for further replies.
Luma is simple and clean too. It also has extra features, doesn't need extra files, and has rosalina which has a lot of potential even if it doesn't have too much now.
c'mon could anyone except me now tell him that he is annoying and WE ALL GOT YOUR OPINION MAN I'm really getting pissed @AuroraWright also said that she don't care what people use, and If I want to dual boot reinand to have the nostalgic feeling of 1st time "hacking" something and luma to have an easy way to shut the console down, then I'll do so and you and your crappy statements can fuck off.
 
c'mon could anyone except me now tell him that he is annoying and WE ALL GOT YOUR OPINION MAN I'm really getting pissed @AuroraWright also said that she don't care what people use, and If I want to dual boot reinand to have the nostalgic feeling of 1st time "hacking" something and luma to have an easy way to shut the console down, then I'll do so and you and your crappy statements can fuck off.
chill
 
I know, I check certain repos daily, but some people seem to forget that luma would not exist without reinand
NOTHING would exist without Gateway, but that doesn't stop 99% of the people here from bashing it. GW was first. PERIOD.

and Reinand being the first CFW? bwahahahaha you guys are f'ing stupid.
 
NOTHING would exist without Gateway, but that doesn't stop 99% of the people here from bashing it. GW was first. PERIOD.

and Reinand being the first CFW? bwahahahaha you guys are f'ing stupid.

The fact that reiNAND did exist WITHOUT the need of a Gateway Card makes me feel legit about what I am saying.
 
That's what makes Reinand so unique, at it's release time ot was the first customized firmware (thx @SciresM , I'll use that term from now on) which had a splash screen at boot, which is Reisyukaku's Avatar
i see.... but if luma is a fork of reinand, and its better cause it has a bunch of cool stuff that must modern cfw's have why use reinand if luma is kinda just a better version
 
i see.... but if luma is a fork of reinand, and its better cause it has a bunch of cool stuff that must modern cfw's have why use reinand if luma is kinda just a better version

Because some people likes to keep it simple, and minimalistic. Luma is a pretty good CFW too, but some people don't like it because of "too much patches" but as Aurora said, some patches can be disabled.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CrimsonMaple
I don't care what people use but "Luma is bloated" or "Luma is made to restrict users"

As is the "just use Luma" comments. But that's the community, not you.

I just think that simplicity is more important than allowing one to toggle everything even when there's no advantage in doing that.

As much as I appreciate simplicity, I enjoy tinkering. Guess that's just our difference. I like being able to "remove" additions I barely use. I guess options need to exist.

I value giving a choice only if there's actually a purpose in doing so (I mentioned a few examples above).

What if the purpose is because, "I wanna, so I am!" :P. Joking aside, reasonable answer. I agree. However there are the few wild exceptions. One was posted much earlier in the thread. I feel this is all up to the devs and their views.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billy Acuña
i see.... but if luma is a fork of reinand, and its better cause it has a bunch of cool stuff that must modern cfw's have why use reinand if luma is kinda just a better version
Luma isn't a fork anymore as the codebase was completely rewritten, also once again, there is no advantage in Luma, If I use Reinand for regular playing, corbenik for debugging, and luma just to check what time it is, then there is no advantage.
 
Last edited by adrifcastr,
Luma isn't a fork anymore as the codebase was conpletely rewritten, also once again, there is no advantage in Luma, If I use Reinand for regular playing, corbenik for debugging, and luma just to check what time it is, then there is no advantage.
You heard him guys, layeredfs, rosalina, etc. are not advantages. Just switch back to rxtools, none of that stuff matters.
 
i see.... but if luma is a fork of reinand, and its better cause it has a bunch of cool stuff that must modern cfw's have why use reinand if luma is kinda just a better version
And this is the fundimental question behind the CFW wars. It's mostly personal preference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ryccardo
Luma isn't a fork anymore as the codebase was completely rewritten, also once again, there is no advantage in Luma, If I use Reinand for regular playing, corbenik for debugging, and luma just to check what time it is, then there is no advantage.
not to be rude, but why use an out dated firmware doesnt make seance also isnt cobenik outdated and shit?
 
You heard him guys, layeredfs, rosalina, etc. are not advantages. Just switch back to rxtools, none of that stuff matters.

hmm. Not sure but actually LayeredFS is a HUGE advantage for ROMHacking. If you like to tinker with your games, you go combo LayeredFS + cheating with NTR and you have the perfect game xD
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum