Hacking Gateway: The Pudding Is Not A Lie (7.2.0)

[DinohScene]

no worries, but still gateway never actually said they had 4.5+ working, just that they where looking into it

Aye, but still, they made the promise none the less.
I think their just waiting for Smea to finish his 7.1/7.2 exploit and then copy it for themselves.
Seeing that's usually how it goes ;p

 

[Armadillo]

Yeah, not sure where the whole "gateway promised greater than 4.5" comes from. All they ever said about it was they are looking into it and hope to support it.

Not sure how, hope to do something, got twisted into, we promise to do it.

 

[Armadillo]

Aye, but still, they made the promise none the less.

No.

Gateway never promised 4.5+ support. They said they are looking into it and hope to have it. No promise of it.

 

[gamesquest1]

Aye, but still, they made the promise none the less.
I think their just waiting for Smea to finish his 7.1/7.2 exploit and then copy it for themselves.
Seeing that's usually how it goes ;p

the only promise was to look into it, im sure they looked pretty hard XD

 

[Rizzorules]

Aye, but still, they made the promise none the less.
I think their just waiting for Smea to finish his 7.1/7.2 exploit and then copy it for themselves.
Seeing that's usually how it goes ;p

Smea exploit= no kernel access=no gateway

 

[Flame]

Aye, but still, they made the promise none the less.
I think their just waiting for Smea to finish his 7.1/7.2 exploit and then copy it for themselves.
Seeing that's usually how it goes ;p

dinoh, Smea copied Gateway 1st .....

<3

 

[phanteon]

please do not ever support cheats. Im 100% sure somebody will then release a tool to cheat online.
There's always some rat kid wanting to troll people online, that would motivate Nintendo to start banning people

 

[gamesquest1]

please do not ever support cheats. Im 100% sure somebody will then release a tool to cheat online.
There's always some rat kid wanting to troll people online, that would motivate Nintendo to start banning people

assuming nintendo have done their job properly is shouldn't be that easy to cheat online

.....and lets be honest there is only like 2 competitive online multiplayer games

 

[Gh0sti]

well im for one happy for their continual supp even super card has been supporting DS2 for awhile even past its prime, im excited to see the next update hopefully 2.3 brings 7.0 SDK encryption support

 

[hundshamer]

...mmm chocolate pudding.

 

[the_randomizer]

no worries, but still gateway never actually said they had 4.5+ working, just that they where looking into it

Which means absolutely nothing AFAIK

 

[untok]

Only time will tell but hoping 7.xx keys included future emunand. Now only backup emunand and wait whats next.

 

[Tomy Sakazaki]

assuming nintendo have done their job properly is shouldn't be that easy to cheat online

.....and lets be honest there is only like 2 competitive online multiplayer games

And one of them was already ruined by offline cheaters last generation.

 

[tjexp]

And one of them was already ruined by offline cheaters last generation.

Which was this?

Hopefully gateway will show us something soon

 

[Tomy Sakazaki]

Which was this?

Hopefully gateway will show us something soon

Do you ever play pokémon?
You don't need to apply cheats while playing a online match to ruin it, all you have to do is do same save edits (offline cheating).

 

[MGS1980]

Do you ever play pokémon?
You don't need to apply cheats while playing a online match to ruin it, all you have to do is do same save edits (offline cheating).

And what save edits would that be? Only Powersaves can modify saves, and a Gatway ROM backup nor a cart played/saved on a Gateway can be used with that. Even at that, there is no save edit on Powersaves that could ruin online play as it stands.

 

[Tomy Sakazaki]

And one of them was already ruined by offline cheaters last generation.

Quoting myself: last generation (DS games).
The day that encryption on saves is broken (and it's a easier task than finding kernel exploits since savegames most of times use weaker keys and algorithms) competitive play on pokémon games will be plagued by hacked mons again.

Also, the day that gateway gives players RAM editing capabilites (gameshark, action replay like), people can and will cheat at pokémon, editing their mons through RAM, saving the game, using the monsters at online play.

And RAM editing is perfectly doable, I remember those early leaks of pokémons that will be yet distributed at cinemas.

 

[loco365]

Quoting myself: last generation (DS games).
The day that encryption on saves is broken (and it's a easier task than finding kernel exploits since savegames most of times use weaker keys and algorithms) competitive play on pokémon games will be plagued by hacked mons again.

That's if games with NAND saves can be dumped, modified, and reflashed without skewing keys and having our save wiped.

 

[gamesquest1]

Quoting myself: last generation (DS games).
The day that encryption on saves is broken (and it's a easier task than finding kernel exploits since savegames most of times use weaker keys and algorithms) competitive play on pokémon games will be plagued by hacked mons again.

and that's down to nintendo to have learned from past mistakes and have proper hacked pokemon filters

 

[MGS1980]

Quoting myself: last generation (DS games).
The day that encryption on saves is broken (and it's a easier task than finding kernel exploits since savegames most of times use weaker keys and algorithms) competitive play on pokémon games will be plagued by hacked mons again.

Also, the day that gateway gives players RAM editing capabilites (gameshark, action replay like), people can and will cheat at pokémon, editing their mons through RAM, saving the game, using the monsters at online play.

And RAM editing is perfectly doable, I remember those early leaks of pokémons that will be yet distributed at cinemas.

You obviously have no clue what is involved in getting a RAM dump and how save signing works on the 3DS or you wouldn't be acting like it is such a simple task. Just to fill you in, you are way off.