If you haven't been reading up on 3D printing lately, you should. While the technology is still very much in its infancy, the potential it holds is staggering. They may soon be used to revolutionize factories, construction, and space exploration. (Please note: I'm not stopping there because I ran out of things to list; I'm stopping there because if I kept on going, I'd be here all night.)
3D Printing isn't just something large corporations and government agencies will have access to, either. Consumer models for the home are already being sold and marketed. Their use is a bit limited right now, but one group has been looking into changing all that.
The Defense Distributed project, lead by University of Texas graduate Cody Wilson, recently received funding to design a 3D-printable firearm. Anyone with a 3D printer and the proper materials would be able to forge their own handgun in the comforts of their home.
However, it looks like the project has suffered a bit of a misfire.
CNET
Considering the aim of this project, this sort of backlash isn't much of a surprise. The law around an initiative like this is pretty murky, and worry over the scope of it is certainly understandable. After all, how can you hope to regulate firearms when everyone can easily make their own?
Defense Distributed is not deterred, yet. Despite this wave of setbacks, they're refusing to recoil from the project's aims.
So, what do you think? Do these guys have a shot, or should they be suppressed in the name of safety?
3D Printing isn't just something large corporations and government agencies will have access to, either. Consumer models for the home are already being sold and marketed. Their use is a bit limited right now, but one group has been looking into changing all that.
The Defense Distributed project, lead by University of Texas graduate Cody Wilson, recently received funding to design a 3D-printable firearm. Anyone with a 3D printer and the proper materials would be able to forge their own handgun in the comforts of their home.
However, it looks like the project has suffered a bit of a misfire.
As reported here in September, Defense Distributed, a group headed by University of Texas graduate student Wilson, began navigating the uncharted material and regulatory waters around designing a gun to be printed from common plastic on a relatively low-cost 3D printer like the MakerBot Replicator.
Now, Wired's Robert Beckhusen reports that Stratasys has voided the lease for the printer Defense Distributed had rented, and sent representatives to physically reclaim it last week.
Further, Beckhusen reports that a visit to the Austin, TX branch of the ATF turned into an unexpected questioning session for Wilson when he went down to investigate the legal requirements of the Defense Distributed project.
Considering the aim of this project, this sort of backlash isn't much of a surprise. The law around an initiative like this is pretty murky, and worry over the scope of it is certainly understandable. After all, how can you hope to regulate firearms when everyone can easily make their own?
Defense Distributed is not deterred, yet. Despite this wave of setbacks, they're refusing to recoil from the project's aims.
So, what do you think? Do these guys have a shot, or should they be suppressed in the name of safety?