- Joined
- Feb 10, 2009
- Messages
- 7,252
- Reaction score
- 5,748
- Trophies
- 3
- Location
- Sacramento, California
- Website
- lazerlight.x10.mx
- XP
- 9,556
- Country

Trump's war on drug trafficking..... unless you're a Honduran ex-president.....


Actually, all of the sources I've shared have proven the U.S. was not acting on reasonable suspicions that there were drugs, if you'd have taken a read. They made claims but had no evidence. We aren't at war, so there is no reason to fire on these vessels.And ABC News Confirmed that a Boat that was struck TWICE had Drugs.
Also, if I am correct, they used a Drone Strike, so they would not know it is coming. And unless the Sources you shared can prove beyond a doubt that they did not have Drugs, fine. But until then, fair game against Cartels. What, you want to believe them? I would only trust them as far as I can throw them, which would not be much, with my Back-Leg Injury. Plus, Hegseth did a Interview stating they Identified the Boats, means are Classified. Because if the Cartels knew how they are being Identified, they would look for ways around it, making it useless, and they would be bringing more Drugs.
I've spent more time on Navy ships, than you have been alive, so yes I know. Better than you. I'm on one right now, thus the long times between replies. It's international law that says they're stateless, dumbass. And no, sinking a ship does not mean to kill everyone. People abandon their ship, and they are rescued. It is you who lives on what your beloved media is feeding you, and trying to read between the lines of a reporter who doesn't know any better.Have you read the article?
An order was given to sink the ship. So, what is your argument exactly? I can only assume you're focusing on semantics, "the order was to sink the ship not kill them".
do you know what happens to people in the ocean if you sink their ship
especially if they're near the ship when you blow it up
Its just such a ridiculous thing to say. If the order was never given, how did it happen? Are they just bad at their jobs? Can you imagine deploying the "they didn't mean it" defence for anyone else? It's the fucking military, not primary school, it doesn't stop being a problem if you did it by accident. They're supposed to think these things through.
The stated goal is to stop drugs entering the US. If there were drugs, they had already eliminated the "threat" from that boat with the first strike. Why kill people you could interrogate and use as proof of how right you are? That'd be a really weird thing to do, unless you actually aren't that sure or think killing people is badass.
I think you realise how flimsy that excuse is, because you then try to argue how it's totally fine to kill them, actually. Because its not a war crime. The only kind of crime that exists.
Hence why I ask if you've read the article.
Bit of a weird thing to leave out. Did you forget, or stop reading the article as soon as you had what you thought you needed?
Why are you trying to argue about this if you don't even know international law exists?

How the hell would you know, you weren't there. For that matter, even Pete himself isn't a reliable witness on the matter, given how often he's completely wasted.The point is, people are saying that Pete said to "kill them all". FALSE. PERIOD.
Some soldier you are, calling an admiral a liar. Get back to peeling potatoes, swabbie.I've spent more time on Navy ships, than you have been alive, so yes I know. Better than you. I'm on one right now, thus the long times between replies.
...
The point is, people are saying that Pete said to "kill them all". FALSE. PERIOD.
Get over yourself.You fucktards even try to start lies about me, and had to get that shut down by an admin before I had a chance to reply. You just never know when to quit. Actually doesn't bother me as much as some of you think, because I'm thick-skinned, and think you're a bunch of brainwashed dickheads.
Did this happen in reality? Maybe they would have had a higher chance of surviving if they weren't blown up?And no, sinking a ship does not mean to kill everyone. People abandon their ship, and they are rescued.
Maduro is not popular though.Option 5.5: all of the above
I'm sure Iraq's citizens felt that way too, before they got blown up with air strikes.Maduro is not popular though.
He also one-sidedly claimed part of the neighboring country (Guyana) "for his people" due to... oil.
So, it's all about oil in the end, with maybe an additional drug cartel lord bonus (which Trump would totally take control of, not get rid of).
Overall, we here at SA would greatly appreciate one less obvious dictator in power over whatever puppet leader the US places there.
Some soldier you are, calling an admiral a liar. Get back to peeling potatoes, swabbie.
Get over yourself.
EDIT:
Reminder that this guy fell for the ms13 tattoo photoshop and thinks they're in any position to say something like that to literally anyone else.You fucktards even try to start lies about me, and had to get that shut down by an admin before I had a chance to reply. You just never know when to quit. Actually doesn't bother me as much as some of you think, because I'm thick-skinned, and think you're a bunch of brainwashed dickheads.

I'm sure Iraq's citizens felt that way too, before they got blown up with air strikes.
I bet the only time he's spent on Navy ships was as a child or a visitor.Yeah probably another case of stolen valor here
Reminder that this guy fell for the ms13 tattoo photoshop and thinks they're in any position to say something like that to literally anyone else.
A thick skinned person would not have had that kind of meltdown either.
Friendly reminder that the Geneva Conventions covers all people. Stateless individuals, which include those ships not flying a flag, are still individuals in war.I've spent more time on Navy ships, than you have been alive, so yes I know. Better than you. I'm on one right now, thus the long times between replies. It's international law that says they're stateless, dumbass. And no, sinking a ship does not mean to kill everyone. People abandon their ship, and they are rescued. It is you who lives on what your beloved media is feeding you, and trying to read between the lines of a reporter who doesn't know any better.
The point is, people are saying that Pete said to "kill them all". FALSE. PERIOD. You fucktards even try to start lies about me, and had to get that shut down by an admin before I had a chance to reply. You just never know when to quit. Actually doesn't bother me as much as some of you think, because I'm thick-skinned, and think you're a bunch of brainwashed dickheads.
Stateless or not is a moot point. If they had drugs or not is a moot point. It's an international crime to just bomb people of another country. It's doubly illegal to attack people after they are incapacitated. Period.Friendly reminder that the Geneva Conventions covers all people. Stateless individuals, which include those ships not flying a flag, are still individuals in war.
Another friendly reminder that according to every source available, all of these boats are alleged drug carriers, and no evidence has been found to support the fact that they are. Please, by all means, prove me wrong. I'm waiting.
"We've just seized a tanker on the coast of Venezuela, large tanker, very large, largest one ever, actually, and other things are happening". - TrumpView attachment 544445
Congratulations to those who "guessed" oil, they've just seized an oil tanker.
...he doesn't know why they've done that, does he? This is just another "my handlers told me to do it".
I just... I am not even upset or angry or anything. This is parody.View attachment 544445
Congratulations to those who "guessed" oil, they've just seized an oil tanker.
...he doesn't know why they've done that, does he? This is just another "my handlers told me to do it".
