Why is the US terrorizing Venezuela?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taleweaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Views Views 36,514
  • Replies Replies 555
  • Likes Likes 2
  • Friendly reminder: The politics section is a place where a lot of differing opinions are raised. You may not like what you read here but it is someone's opinion. As long as the debate is respectful you are free to debate freely. Also, the views and opinions expressed by forum members may not necessarily reflect those of GBAtemp. Messages that the staff consider offensive or inflammatory may be removed in line with existing forum terms and conditions. Saying NO to fascists/nazis - if you are one of those, you are not welcome here

How come Venezuela is even in the picture right now?

  • They've got a lot of oil reserves

    Votes: 54 55.7%
  • To gain a foothold in the region (aka: fend off China)

    Votes: 3 3.1%
  • Distraction from the Epstein file contents, ballroom drama, ...

    Votes: 21 21.6%
  • Maduro's a socialist AND popular

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Concerns over drugs (aka: Make America Great Again actually means the continent)

    Votes: 10 10.3%
  • Other, namely...

    Votes: 9 9.3%

  • Total voters
    97
And ABC News Confirmed that a Boat that was struck TWICE had Drugs.
Also, if I am correct, they used a Drone Strike, so they would not know it is coming. And unless the Sources you shared can prove beyond a doubt that they did not have Drugs, fine. But until then, fair game against Cartels. What, you want to believe them? I would only trust them as far as I can throw them, which would not be much, with my Back-Leg Injury. Plus, Hegseth did a Interview stating they Identified the Boats, means are Classified. Because if the Cartels knew how they are being Identified, they would look for ways around it, making it useless, and they would be bringing more Drugs.
Actually, all of the sources I've shared have proven the U.S. was not acting on reasonable suspicions that there were drugs, if you'd have taken a read. They made claims but had no evidence. We aren't at war, so there is no reason to fire on these vessels.
 
Have you read the article?

An order was given to sink the ship. So, what is your argument exactly? I can only assume you're focusing on semantics, "the order was to sink the ship not kill them".

do you know what happens to people in the ocean if you sink their ship

especially if they're near the ship when you blow it up

Its just such a ridiculous thing to say. If the order was never given, how did it happen? Are they just bad at their jobs? Can you imagine deploying the "they didn't mean it" defence for anyone else? It's the fucking military, not primary school, it doesn't stop being a problem if you did it by accident. They're supposed to think these things through.

The stated goal is to stop drugs entering the US. If there were drugs, they had already eliminated the "threat" from that boat with the first strike. Why kill people you could interrogate and use as proof of how right you are? That'd be a really weird thing to do, unless you actually aren't that sure or think killing people is badass.


I think you realise how flimsy that excuse is, because you then try to argue how it's totally fine to kill them, actually. Because its not a war crime. The only kind of crime that exists.

Hence why I ask if you've read the article.

Bit of a weird thing to leave out. Did you forget, or stop reading the article as soon as you had what you thought you needed?

Why are you trying to argue about this if you don't even know international law exists?
I've spent more time on Navy ships, than you have been alive, so yes I know. Better than you. I'm on one right now, thus the long times between replies. It's international law that says they're stateless, dumbass. And no, sinking a ship does not mean to kill everyone. People abandon their ship, and they are rescued. It is you who lives on what your beloved media is feeding you, and trying to read between the lines of a reporter who doesn't know any better.

The point is, people are saying that Pete said to "kill them all". FALSE. PERIOD. You fucktards even try to start lies about me, and had to get that shut down by an admin before I had a chance to reply. You just never know when to quit. Actually doesn't bother me as much as some of you think, because I'm thick-skinned, and think you're a bunch of brainwashed dickheads.
 
Last edited by urherenow,
I've spent more time on Navy ships, than you have been alive, so yes I know. Better than you. I'm on one right now, thus the long times between replies.

...

The point is, people are saying that Pete said to "kill them all". FALSE. PERIOD.
Some soldier you are, calling an admiral a liar. Get back to peeling potatoes, swabbie.
You fucktards even try to start lies about me, and had to get that shut down by an admin before I had a chance to reply. You just never know when to quit. Actually doesn't bother me as much as some of you think, because I'm thick-skinned, and think you're a bunch of brainwashed dickheads.
Get over yourself.

EDIT:
 
Last edited by BlazeHeatnix,
Option 5.5: all of the above
Maduro is not popular though.
He also one-sidedly claimed part of the neighboring country (Guyana) "for his people" due to... oil.
So, it's all about oil in the end, with maybe an additional drug cartel lord bonus (which Trump would totally take control of, not get rid of).

Overall, we here at SA would greatly appreciate one less obvious dictator in power over whatever puppet leader the US places there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xdqwerty
Maduro is not popular though.
He also one-sidedly claimed part of the neighboring country (Guyana) "for his people" due to... oil.
So, it's all about oil in the end, with maybe an additional drug cartel lord bonus (which Trump would totally take control of, not get rid of).

Overall, we here at SA would greatly appreciate one less obvious dictator in power over whatever puppet leader the US places there.
I'm sure Iraq's citizens felt that way too, before they got blown up with air strikes.
 
Some soldier you are, calling an admiral a liar. Get back to peeling potatoes, swabbie.

Get over yourself.

EDIT:

Yeah probably another case of stolen valor here

You fucktards even try to start lies about me, and had to get that shut down by an admin before I had a chance to reply. You just never know when to quit. Actually doesn't bother me as much as some of you think, because I'm thick-skinned, and think you're a bunch of brainwashed dickheads.
Reminder that this guy fell for the ms13 tattoo photoshop and thinks they're in any position to say something like that to literally anyone else.

A thick skinned person would not have had that kind of meltdown either.
 
Yeah probably another case of stolen valor here


Reminder that this guy fell for the ms13 tattoo photoshop and thinks they're in any position to say something like that to literally anyone else.

A thick skinned person would not have had that kind of meltdown either.
I bet the only time he's spent on Navy ships was as a child or a visitor.

I've spent more time on Navy ships, than you have been alive, so yes I know. Better than you. I'm on one right now, thus the long times between replies. It's international law that says they're stateless, dumbass. And no, sinking a ship does not mean to kill everyone. People abandon their ship, and they are rescued. It is you who lives on what your beloved media is feeding you, and trying to read between the lines of a reporter who doesn't know any better.

The point is, people are saying that Pete said to "kill them all". FALSE. PERIOD. You fucktards even try to start lies about me, and had to get that shut down by an admin before I had a chance to reply. You just never know when to quit. Actually doesn't bother me as much as some of you think, because I'm thick-skinned, and think you're a bunch of brainwashed dickheads.
Friendly reminder that the Geneva Conventions covers all people. Stateless individuals, which include those ships not flying a flag, are still individuals in war.

Another friendly reminder that according to every source available, all of these boats are alleged drug carriers, and no evidence has been found to support the fact that they are. Please, by all means, prove me wrong. I'm waiting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarknessPlay3r
Friendly reminder that the Geneva Conventions covers all people. Stateless individuals, which include those ships not flying a flag, are still individuals in war.

Another friendly reminder that according to every source available, all of these boats are alleged drug carriers, and no evidence has been found to support the fact that they are. Please, by all means, prove me wrong. I'm waiting.
Stateless or not is a moot point. If they had drugs or not is a moot point. It's an international crime to just bomb people of another country. It's doubly illegal to attack people after they are incapacitated. Period.

There's no wiggle-room for this topic in the slightest. So they'll just double-down and say that they deserved it. All the while ignoring that some survivors were captured and then released to their countries (Because they weren't drug traffickers). I hope Hegseth takes a single step out of the US and is immediately arrested and sent to the Hague.
 
1765400921260.png


Congratulations to those who "guessed" oil, they've just seized an oil tanker.

...he doesn't know why they've done that, does he? This is just another "my handlers told me to do it".
 
View attachment 544445

Congratulations to those who "guessed" oil, they've just seized an oil tanker.

...he doesn't know why they've done that, does he? This is just another "my handlers told me to do it".
"We've just seized a tanker on the coast of Venezuela, large tanker, very large, largest one ever, actually, and other things are happening". - Trump

I mean.... wow..... His brain is so rotted that even things that he steals have to be the 'largest ever'.
 
View attachment 544445

Congratulations to those who "guessed" oil, they've just seized an oil tanker.

...he doesn't know why they've done that, does he? This is just another "my handlers told me to do it".
I just... I am not even upset or angry or anything. This is parody.

What a morbidly goofy timeline we have here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jayro and Xzi
It is a win win situation for the Orange Pedo in the white house and his allies / minions.

If they go to war with Venezuela (that is the dream for this administration imho), Trump and Companies can invoque some "war powers" and seize control of the USA for good.
Sure they will meet some resistance but let just be pragmatic here, so far they have done a lot of bad things no other administration did in the short lived years of you country, and always got away with it. So yes i believe this is the end game of those in power.
Plus Trump can gloat that hes fighting for Venezuelans freedom against Maduro's corrupt regime (lol the hypocrisy will be just the cherry on top).

If the piece of sh*t Maduro does not take the bait (and i hope he doesn't), its also a win for Trump since they will just seize the Oil and the ships and probably find a way to get even richer in the process.

Either way it will serve the Pedo Master in distracting for hes past and current actions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AncientBoi

Site & Scene News

Popular threads in this forum