[REDACTED]
[EDIT] Fuck, link removed.
What did you link to thats so bad?
[REDACTED]
[EDIT] Fuck, link removed.
There is no need to get ARM11 for that, as downgrade is not necessarily NAND downgrade. There are legit CIAs for updates on that iso site.for piracy. but it's also nice to have something that 3ds is capable of but nintendo decided to not give us. gba and dsi "bc", screenshoots, save backup for all 3ds games.
sorry but I have to ask, how would you manage to downgrade without arm9 control if it's the one which handles signcheck?
There is a way to workaround it.because if you give update pack with lower version, it will be ignored?
There is a way to workaround it.
Like change the version number on the .cia to fake it as being higher than the ones currently installed or something?
I hear it should be possible, given that the person who made the ds whitelist downgrade .cia changed the version number to maximum possible so it could be installed on sysnand and persist through system updates.
It was still working after they installed it to sysnand and updated to 9.4, so I don't think changing version number would break sig checks, would it? Otherwise it wouldn't have worked in sysnand even less once updated to 9.4
So I can pick things up, type this message, etc.What's your reason for wanting arm control?
Nah man, 9.2: HomeMenuHax AutobootAgreed #8.1 MasterRace
Nah man, 9.2: HomeMenuHax Autoboot
Then how did they achieve what was done in the video?No, it would break the signature. But removing it first and installing an older version works.
Maybe that this CIA is special, I think that it only contains unsigned binary/text files, and the version should be in the title list. So, I don't think that it should be really checked at boot. It should be an older version of the DS whitelist. (If anyone can confirm or correct me, I would like to)Then how did they achieve what was done in the video?
If they simply installed an older version of the ds whitelist, it would have been replaced with a newer one that has the DS flashcards blocked once they updated to 9.4, which was not the case.
The thread says they maxed out the version number on the .cia so it never replaces it when they do firmware updates, and everything still works even though there is no CFW to bypass a supposedly broken signature.
Unless the ds whitelist isn't affected by signature checks?
https://gbatemp.net/threads/release-use-blocked-ds-flashcards-on-3ds-probably-n3ds-too.376719/